Selim Mosbahi, Mikolaj Berezowski, Joseph E Bavaria, John J Kelly, Nicholas Goel, Fei Jiang, Murat Yildiz, Yu Zhao, Wilson Y Szeto, Nimesh D Desai
{"title":"在修复急性 DeBakey I 型胸膜剥离时进行前向胸腔支架移植的长期疗效。","authors":"Selim Mosbahi, Mikolaj Berezowski, Joseph E Bavaria, John J Kelly, Nicholas Goel, Fei Jiang, Murat Yildiz, Yu Zhao, Wilson Y Szeto, Nimesh D Desai","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aim to evaluate the impact of antegrade stenting of the distal arch and proximal descending aorta combined with non-total arch procedures in acute type A aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2005 to 2022, 733 nonsyndromic patients presented with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection and underwent non-total arch procedure. Ninety-five patients underwent antegrade stenting and 638 did not. Propensity-score analysis was performed, and 95 optimal pairs were created. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence of reintervention with death as a competing event was calculated and compared using Gray's method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survival estimates at 10 years after propensity score matching were similar between both groups, 58.9% (95% CI, 46.5%-74.5%) vs 58.4% (95% CI, 48.3%-70.6%) (P = .6) in the non-stented vs stented group. Cumulative incidence of reintervention with competing risk of death at 10 years after propensity matching was 27% (95% CI, 17%-37%) vs 22% (95% CI, 14%-32%) (P = .44), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic repair may be beneficial for remodeling and facilitating future endovascular reinterventions and reduces the occurrence of reintervention for malperfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcomes of Antegrade Thoracic Stent Grafting During Repair of Acute DeBakey I Dissection.\",\"authors\":\"Selim Mosbahi, Mikolaj Berezowski, Joseph E Bavaria, John J Kelly, Nicholas Goel, Fei Jiang, Murat Yildiz, Yu Zhao, Wilson Y Szeto, Nimesh D Desai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aim to evaluate the impact of antegrade stenting of the distal arch and proximal descending aorta combined with non-total arch procedures in acute type A aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2005 to 2022, 733 nonsyndromic patients presented with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection and underwent non-total arch procedure. Ninety-five patients underwent antegrade stenting and 638 did not. Propensity-score analysis was performed, and 95 optimal pairs were created. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence of reintervention with death as a competing event was calculated and compared using Gray's method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survival estimates at 10 years after propensity score matching were similar between both groups, 58.9% (95% CI, 46.5%-74.5%) vs 58.4% (95% CI, 48.3%-70.6%) (P = .6) in the non-stented vs stented group. Cumulative incidence of reintervention with competing risk of death at 10 years after propensity matching was 27% (95% CI, 17%-37%) vs 22% (95% CI, 14%-32%) (P = .44), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic repair may be beneficial for remodeling and facilitating future endovascular reinterventions and reduces the occurrence of reintervention for malperfusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.045\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-Term Outcomes of Antegrade Thoracic Stent Grafting During Repair of Acute DeBakey I Dissection.
Background: We aim to evaluate the impact of antegrade stenting of the distal arch and proximal descending aorta combined with non-total arch procedures in acute type A aortic dissection.
Methods: From 2005 to 2022, 733 nonsyndromic patients presented with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection and underwent non-total arch procedure. Ninety-five patients underwent antegrade stenting and 638 did not. Propensity-score analysis was performed, and 95 optimal pairs were created. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence of reintervention with death as a competing event was calculated and compared using Gray's method.
Results: Survival estimates at 10 years after propensity score matching were similar between both groups, 58.9% (95% CI, 46.5%-74.5%) vs 58.4% (95% CI, 48.3%-70.6%) (P = .6) in the non-stented vs stented group. Cumulative incidence of reintervention with competing risk of death at 10 years after propensity matching was 27% (95% CI, 17%-37%) vs 22% (95% CI, 14%-32%) (P = .44), respectively.
Conclusions: Antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic repair may be beneficial for remodeling and facilitating future endovascular reinterventions and reduces the occurrence of reintervention for malperfusion.
期刊介绍:
The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features:
• Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques
• New Technology articles
• Case reports
• "How-to-do-it" features
• Reviews of current literature
• Supplements on symposia
• Commentary pieces and correspondence
• CME
• Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery.
An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.