在社交媒体生态系统中表达和协商身份:用户类型及其相关人格特征

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-08-25 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112824
David R. Pillow , Janelle Kohler , Candace Bowers , Stephanie Mills , Meghan A. Crabtree
{"title":"在社交媒体生态系统中表达和协商身份:用户类型及其相关人格特征","authors":"David R. Pillow ,&nbsp;Janelle Kohler ,&nbsp;Candace Bowers ,&nbsp;Stephanie Mills ,&nbsp;Meghan A. Crabtree","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In social media research, many make a distinction between active use and passive use. This distinction may focus too simplistically on the quantity of content shared rather than the qualitative ways that individuals present themselves online. Informed by self-monitoring theory, this paper examines whether there exist distinct classes of individuals who vary with respect to how actively and selectively they present themselves online. Participants reported on measures assessing open disclosure (feeling that one can share anything), restricting audiences (limiting the telling of one's story to only some audience members), limiting identities (sharing only specific identity aspects online), passive use (reading the content of others), and extent of posting content. A latent class analysis of these assessments (<span><math><mi>N</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>391</mn></math></span>) identified four types of persons: active authentic (openly sharing without restrictions), active negotiators (sharing with audience restrictions via limited aspects of self), quiet authentic (feeling free to share, but not doing so often), and passive restrictive (low use with restricted audiences and limited identities). A mixed ANOVA using the HEXACO found that the four user types differ most notably on extraversion and emotionality. Implications are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 112824"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expressing and negotiating identities in social media ecosystems: A typology of users and their associated personality profiles\",\"authors\":\"David R. Pillow ,&nbsp;Janelle Kohler ,&nbsp;Candace Bowers ,&nbsp;Stephanie Mills ,&nbsp;Meghan A. Crabtree\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In social media research, many make a distinction between active use and passive use. This distinction may focus too simplistically on the quantity of content shared rather than the qualitative ways that individuals present themselves online. Informed by self-monitoring theory, this paper examines whether there exist distinct classes of individuals who vary with respect to how actively and selectively they present themselves online. Participants reported on measures assessing open disclosure (feeling that one can share anything), restricting audiences (limiting the telling of one's story to only some audience members), limiting identities (sharing only specific identity aspects online), passive use (reading the content of others), and extent of posting content. A latent class analysis of these assessments (<span><math><mi>N</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>391</mn></math></span>) identified four types of persons: active authentic (openly sharing without restrictions), active negotiators (sharing with audience restrictions via limited aspects of self), quiet authentic (feeling free to share, but not doing so often), and passive restrictive (low use with restricted audiences and limited identities). A mixed ANOVA using the HEXACO found that the four user types differ most notably on extraversion and emotionality. Implications are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"232 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924002848\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924002848","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在社交媒体研究中,许多人对主动使用和被动使用进行了区分。这种区分可能过于简单地关注分享内容的数量,而不是个人在网上展示自我的质量。在自我监控理论的指导下,本文研究了是否存在不同的个人群体,他们在网上展示自我的主动性和选择性方面各不相同。参与者对公开披露(觉得自己可以分享任何东西)、限制受众(只对部分受众讲述自己的故事)、限制身份(只在网上分享特定身份方面的内容)、被动使用(阅读他人的内容)以及发布内容的程度进行了评估。对这些评估(N=391)进行的潜类分析确定了四种类型的人:主动真实型(不受限制地公开分享)、主动协商型(通过自我的有限方面与受众进行限制性分享)、安静真实型(感觉可以自由分享,但不经常这样做)和被动限制型(在受众受限和身份受限的情况下使用率低)。使用 HEXACO 进行的混合方差分析发现,四种用户类型在外向性和情感性方面的差异最为明显。本文对其影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expressing and negotiating identities in social media ecosystems: A typology of users and their associated personality profiles

In social media research, many make a distinction between active use and passive use. This distinction may focus too simplistically on the quantity of content shared rather than the qualitative ways that individuals present themselves online. Informed by self-monitoring theory, this paper examines whether there exist distinct classes of individuals who vary with respect to how actively and selectively they present themselves online. Participants reported on measures assessing open disclosure (feeling that one can share anything), restricting audiences (limiting the telling of one's story to only some audience members), limiting identities (sharing only specific identity aspects online), passive use (reading the content of others), and extent of posting content. A latent class analysis of these assessments (N=391) identified four types of persons: active authentic (openly sharing without restrictions), active negotiators (sharing with audience restrictions via limited aspects of self), quiet authentic (feeling free to share, but not doing so often), and passive restrictive (low use with restricted audiences and limited identities). A mixed ANOVA using the HEXACO found that the four user types differ most notably on extraversion and emotionality. Implications are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
The Golden Mean Inventory: A new approach to studying character strengths imbalances across contexts Inside Front Cover - Ed. Board, Aims and Scope, Copyright, Publication information, Orders and Claims, Advertising information, Author inquiries, Permissions, Funding body, Permanence of paper, Impressum (German titles only) and GFA link in double column ISSID Pages The number of exceptional people: Fewer than 85 per 1 million across key traits Priming moral self-ambivalence facilitates cognitive flexibility in young adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1