预测长江口鲚鱼丰度分布:从内插法到外推法

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ecss.2024.108935
Yichuan Wang , Jianhui Wu , Xuefang Wang
{"title":"预测长江口鲚鱼丰度分布:从内插法到外推法","authors":"Yichuan Wang ,&nbsp;Jianhui Wu ,&nbsp;Xuefang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecss.2024.108935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Coilia nasus</em> was once an economically important fish in the Yangtze River estuary, but overfishing and other anthropogenic factors have severely depleted its population. To conserve and restore <em>C. nasus</em>, there is an urgent need to determine its precise spatiotemporal distribution. However, as a typical anadromous species, <em>C. nasus</em> seasonally uses estuarine habitats, resulting in a very high proportion of nulls in some seasons and posing a great challenge to predicting abundance. This study compared three commonly used tree methods (gradient boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF), and conditional random forest (CRF)) to predict the abundance of <em>C. nasus</em> in the Yangtze River estuary using trawl resource monitoring survey data from 2013 to 2018. Based on the survey data, 16 explanatory variables, including temperature, salinity, pH, and chemical oxygen demand, were used as predictors, and the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), root mean square error (RMSE), and root mean square logarithmic error (RMSLE) were used to evaluate the performance of the three tree methods. Three metrics were used to assess the performance difference between interpolation and extrapolation for the three tree methods when modeling by season and combining seasons. The results showed that (1) compared with combined modeling, seasonal modeling could accurately determine the high- and low-abundance regions in interpolation, and the quarterly model greatly improved the extrapolation prediction accuracy. (2) Almost all metrics indicated that the interpolation RF model had the best performance, while CRF and GBM were significantly worse than other methods for some indicators, and the RF model had better robustness and could be applied to the abundance of all seasons. (3) The model performance in extrapolation was significantly lower than that of interpolation, RF was also the best method, and RF could still identify high-abundance areas when the amount of data was much smaller than that used for interpolation. The findings of our study can be generalized to species distribution modeling of other migratory species in the Yangtze River estuary or estuarine ecosystems in the Northwest Pacific Ocean.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50497,"journal":{"name":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","volume":"308 ","pages":"Article 108935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting the distribution of Coilia nasus abundance in the Yangtze River estuary: From interpolation to extrapolation\",\"authors\":\"Yichuan Wang ,&nbsp;Jianhui Wu ,&nbsp;Xuefang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecss.2024.108935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Coilia nasus</em> was once an economically important fish in the Yangtze River estuary, but overfishing and other anthropogenic factors have severely depleted its population. To conserve and restore <em>C. nasus</em>, there is an urgent need to determine its precise spatiotemporal distribution. However, as a typical anadromous species, <em>C. nasus</em> seasonally uses estuarine habitats, resulting in a very high proportion of nulls in some seasons and posing a great challenge to predicting abundance. This study compared three commonly used tree methods (gradient boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF), and conditional random forest (CRF)) to predict the abundance of <em>C. nasus</em> in the Yangtze River estuary using trawl resource monitoring survey data from 2013 to 2018. Based on the survey data, 16 explanatory variables, including temperature, salinity, pH, and chemical oxygen demand, were used as predictors, and the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>), root mean square error (RMSE), and root mean square logarithmic error (RMSLE) were used to evaluate the performance of the three tree methods. Three metrics were used to assess the performance difference between interpolation and extrapolation for the three tree methods when modeling by season and combining seasons. The results showed that (1) compared with combined modeling, seasonal modeling could accurately determine the high- and low-abundance regions in interpolation, and the quarterly model greatly improved the extrapolation prediction accuracy. (2) Almost all metrics indicated that the interpolation RF model had the best performance, while CRF and GBM were significantly worse than other methods for some indicators, and the RF model had better robustness and could be applied to the abundance of all seasons. (3) The model performance in extrapolation was significantly lower than that of interpolation, RF was also the best method, and RF could still identify high-abundance areas when the amount of data was much smaller than that used for interpolation. The findings of our study can be generalized to species distribution modeling of other migratory species in the Yangtze River estuary or estuarine ecosystems in the Northwest Pacific Ocean.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science\",\"volume\":\"308 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771424003238\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272771424003238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鲚(Coilia nasus)曾是长江口重要的经济鱼类,但过度捕捞和其他人为因素导致其种群数量严重减少。为了保护和恢复鲚鱼,迫切需要确定其精确的时空分布。然而,作为一种典型的溯河物种,C. nasus会季节性地使用河口栖息地,这就导致在某些季节,C. nasus的空游比例非常高,给丰度预测带来了巨大挑战。本研究利用2013年至2018年的拖网资源监测调查数据,比较了三种常用的树方法(梯度提升机(GBM)、随机森林(RF)和条件随机森林(CRF))来预测长江口鲚鱼的丰度。基于调查数据,采用温度、盐度、pH值、化学需氧量等16个解释变量作为预测因子,利用判定系数(R2)、均方根误差(RMSE)和均方根对数误差(RMSLE)来评价三种树方法的性能。在按季节建模和结合季节建模时,使用了三个指标来评估三种树方法的内插法和外推法的性能差异。结果表明:(1)与组合建模相比,季节建模能在内插法中准确确定高丰度区和低丰度区,而季度建模则大大提高了外推法的预测精度。(2)几乎所有指标都表明,内插 RF 模型的性能最好,而 CRF 和 GBM 在某些指标上明显差于其他方法,RF 模型具有更好的鲁棒性,可适用于所有季节的丰度。(3)外推法的模型性能明显低于内插法,RF 也是最好的方法,当数据量远小于内插法时,RF 仍能识别高丰度区。我们的研究结果可推广到长江口其他洄游物种或西北太平洋河口生态系统的物种分布建模中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting the distribution of Coilia nasus abundance in the Yangtze River estuary: From interpolation to extrapolation

Coilia nasus was once an economically important fish in the Yangtze River estuary, but overfishing and other anthropogenic factors have severely depleted its population. To conserve and restore C. nasus, there is an urgent need to determine its precise spatiotemporal distribution. However, as a typical anadromous species, C. nasus seasonally uses estuarine habitats, resulting in a very high proportion of nulls in some seasons and posing a great challenge to predicting abundance. This study compared three commonly used tree methods (gradient boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF), and conditional random forest (CRF)) to predict the abundance of C. nasus in the Yangtze River estuary using trawl resource monitoring survey data from 2013 to 2018. Based on the survey data, 16 explanatory variables, including temperature, salinity, pH, and chemical oxygen demand, were used as predictors, and the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), and root mean square logarithmic error (RMSLE) were used to evaluate the performance of the three tree methods. Three metrics were used to assess the performance difference between interpolation and extrapolation for the three tree methods when modeling by season and combining seasons. The results showed that (1) compared with combined modeling, seasonal modeling could accurately determine the high- and low-abundance regions in interpolation, and the quarterly model greatly improved the extrapolation prediction accuracy. (2) Almost all metrics indicated that the interpolation RF model had the best performance, while CRF and GBM were significantly worse than other methods for some indicators, and the RF model had better robustness and could be applied to the abundance of all seasons. (3) The model performance in extrapolation was significantly lower than that of interpolation, RF was also the best method, and RF could still identify high-abundance areas when the amount of data was much smaller than that used for interpolation. The findings of our study can be generalized to species distribution modeling of other migratory species in the Yangtze River estuary or estuarine ecosystems in the Northwest Pacific Ocean.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science is an international multidisciplinary journal devoted to the analysis of saline water phenomena ranging from the outer edge of the continental shelf to the upper limits of the tidal zone. The journal provides a unique forum, unifying the multidisciplinary approaches to the study of the oceanography of estuaries, coastal zones, and continental shelf seas. It features original research papers, review papers and short communications treating such disciplines as zoology, botany, geology, sedimentology, physical oceanography.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Extreme heat and drought did not affect interspecific interactions between dune grasses Fluctuation asymmetry of Larimichthys polyactis otoliths from artificial and natural habitats: A study case in Haizhou Bay, China Temporal and spatial dynamics of the non-indigenous bryozoan, Amathia verticillata, and its associated invertebrate community Turbidity estimation from an acoustic backscatter signal in a tropical coral reef system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1