德国煤炭妥协中的时间不公正:工业遗产、社会排斥和政治拖延

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103683
{"title":"德国煤炭妥协中的时间不公正:工业遗产、社会排斥和政治拖延","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Researchers, policy-makers, and activists often highlight the temporal dimension of the just energy transition. In this study, we explore the theoretical and empirical connections between justice and the temporality of decarbonization processes, integrating insights from social research on energy transitions and our own interview study. To illustrate how the temporal component becomes an inherent part of deliberative negotiations, we examine the case of the Coal Commission, an advisory body with diverse stakeholders that consulted the Federal Government of Germany in drafting a plan to phase out coal extraction and combustion in 2018/19. Using a conceptual framework that differentiates between implicit and explicit aspects of time in stakeholder negotiations, we identify several temporal injustices in the resulting “coal compromise.” Specifically, we reveal four temporal closures that underpin the compromise and outline the temporal exclusions that shaped it. We conclude that the energy transition is built on an uneven playing field, characterized not only by disparities in power and influence but also by temporal justice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal injustice in Germany's coal compromise: Industrial legacy, social exclusion, and political delay\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Researchers, policy-makers, and activists often highlight the temporal dimension of the just energy transition. In this study, we explore the theoretical and empirical connections between justice and the temporality of decarbonization processes, integrating insights from social research on energy transitions and our own interview study. To illustrate how the temporal component becomes an inherent part of deliberative negotiations, we examine the case of the Coal Commission, an advisory body with diverse stakeholders that consulted the Federal Government of Germany in drafting a plan to phase out coal extraction and combustion in 2018/19. Using a conceptual framework that differentiates between implicit and explicit aspects of time in stakeholder negotiations, we identify several temporal injustices in the resulting “coal compromise.” Specifically, we reveal four temporal closures that underpin the compromise and outline the temporal exclusions that shaped it. We conclude that the energy transition is built on an uneven playing field, characterized not only by disparities in power and influence but also by temporal justice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002743\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员、政策制定者和活动家经常强调公正能源转型的时间维度。在本研究中,我们结合能源转型社会研究和我们自己的访谈研究,探讨了公正与去碳化进程的时间性之间的理论和经验联系。为了说明时间性如何成为商议谈判的固有组成部分,我们研究了煤炭委员会的案例,该委员会是一个由不同利益相关者组成的咨询机构,在起草 2018/19 年逐步淘汰煤炭开采和燃烧的计划时与德国联邦政府进行了磋商。我们使用一个概念框架来区分利益相关者谈判中时间的隐性和显性方面,在由此产生的 "煤炭妥协 "中发现了几种时间上的不公正。具体而言,我们揭示了支撑这一妥协的四种时间封闭,并概述了形成这一妥协的时间排斥。我们的结论是,能源转型是建立在一个不公平的竞争环境之上的,其特点不仅是权力和影响力的差异,还有时间上的不公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Temporal injustice in Germany's coal compromise: Industrial legacy, social exclusion, and political delay

Researchers, policy-makers, and activists often highlight the temporal dimension of the just energy transition. In this study, we explore the theoretical and empirical connections between justice and the temporality of decarbonization processes, integrating insights from social research on energy transitions and our own interview study. To illustrate how the temporal component becomes an inherent part of deliberative negotiations, we examine the case of the Coal Commission, an advisory body with diverse stakeholders that consulted the Federal Government of Germany in drafting a plan to phase out coal extraction and combustion in 2018/19. Using a conceptual framework that differentiates between implicit and explicit aspects of time in stakeholder negotiations, we identify several temporal injustices in the resulting “coal compromise.” Specifically, we reveal four temporal closures that underpin the compromise and outline the temporal exclusions that shaped it. We conclude that the energy transition is built on an uneven playing field, characterized not only by disparities in power and influence but also by temporal justice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Juggling the basics: How much does an income increase affect energy spending of low-income households in England? The informality-energy innovation-finance nexus: Sustainable business models for microgrid-based off-grid urban energy access The future of fossil fuels, chemicals, and feedstocks: Outlining a research agenda on the role of China in the global petrochemical industry Green hydrogen transitions deepen socioecological risks and extractivist patterns: evidence from 28 prospective exporting countries in the Global South Unpacking travel needs and experiences: Insights from qualitative interviews with affordable housing residents in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1