用 XP-PCM 和 GOSTSHYP 模型计算各向同性压力下二价原子分子的键长和偶极矩。

IF 5.7 1区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation Pub Date : 2024-09-10 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00665
Jochen Eeckhoudt, Mercedes Alonso, Paul Geerlings, Frank De Proft
{"title":"用 XP-PCM 和 GOSTSHYP 模型计算各向同性压力下二价原子分子的键长和偶极矩。","authors":"Jochen Eeckhoudt, Mercedes Alonso, Paul Geerlings, Frank De Proft","doi":"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While high-pressure chemistry has a well-established history, methods to simulate pressure at the single-molecule level have been somewhat lacking. The current work aims at comparing two static models (XP-PCM and GOSTSHYP) to apply isotropic pressure to single molecules, focusing on the equilibrium bond length and electric dipole moment of diatomic molecules. Numerical challenges arising in the potential energy surface using the XP-PCM method were examined, and a pragmatic approach was followed to mitigate these. The definition of the cavity was scrutinized, and two approaches to retrieve the isotropic character that could potentially be lost when using the standard methodology were suggested. Subsequently, equilibrium bond lengths under pressure were evaluated, showing reasonable agreement between GOSTSHYP and XP-PCM, but some discrepancies persist. A Taylor series analysis introduced elsewhere was then applied to rationalize the observed trends in terms of the bond surface. Finally, the dipole moment was shown to be highly sensitive to the cavity definition, and qualitative agreement necessitates the use of our adapted procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":45,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bond Lengths and Dipole Moments of Diatomic Molecules under Isotropic Pressure with the XP-PCM and GOSTSHYP Models.\",\"authors\":\"Jochen Eeckhoudt, Mercedes Alonso, Paul Geerlings, Frank De Proft\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While high-pressure chemistry has a well-established history, methods to simulate pressure at the single-molecule level have been somewhat lacking. The current work aims at comparing two static models (XP-PCM and GOSTSHYP) to apply isotropic pressure to single molecules, focusing on the equilibrium bond length and electric dipole moment of diatomic molecules. Numerical challenges arising in the potential energy surface using the XP-PCM method were examined, and a pragmatic approach was followed to mitigate these. The definition of the cavity was scrutinized, and two approaches to retrieve the isotropic character that could potentially be lost when using the standard methodology were suggested. Subsequently, equilibrium bond lengths under pressure were evaluated, showing reasonable agreement between GOSTSHYP and XP-PCM, but some discrepancies persist. A Taylor series analysis introduced elsewhere was then applied to rationalize the observed trends in terms of the bond surface. Finally, the dipole moment was shown to be highly sensitive to the cavity definition, and qualitative agreement necessitates the use of our adapted procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00665\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00665","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然高压化学已有悠久的历史,但在单分子水平上模拟压力的方法却略显匮乏。目前的工作旨在比较两个静态模型(XP-PCM 和 GOSTSHYP),以便对单分子施加各向同性压力,重点是二原子分子的平衡键长和电偶极矩。研究了使用 XP-PCM 方法计算势能面时遇到的数值难题,并采用务实的方法来缓解这些难题。对空腔的定义进行了仔细研究,并提出了两种方法来找回使用标准方法时可能丢失的各向同性特征。随后,对压力下的平衡键长度进行了评估,结果显示 GOSTSHYP 和 XP-PCM 之间存在合理的一致性,但仍存在一些差异。然后,应用在其他地方引入的泰勒级数分析,从键面的角度合理解释了观察到的趋势。最后,偶极矩被证明对空穴定义高度敏感,而定性的一致性要求使用我们的调整程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bond Lengths and Dipole Moments of Diatomic Molecules under Isotropic Pressure with the XP-PCM and GOSTSHYP Models.

While high-pressure chemistry has a well-established history, methods to simulate pressure at the single-molecule level have been somewhat lacking. The current work aims at comparing two static models (XP-PCM and GOSTSHYP) to apply isotropic pressure to single molecules, focusing on the equilibrium bond length and electric dipole moment of diatomic molecules. Numerical challenges arising in the potential energy surface using the XP-PCM method were examined, and a pragmatic approach was followed to mitigate these. The definition of the cavity was scrutinized, and two approaches to retrieve the isotropic character that could potentially be lost when using the standard methodology were suggested. Subsequently, equilibrium bond lengths under pressure were evaluated, showing reasonable agreement between GOSTSHYP and XP-PCM, but some discrepancies persist. A Taylor series analysis introduced elsewhere was then applied to rationalize the observed trends in terms of the bond surface. Finally, the dipole moment was shown to be highly sensitive to the cavity definition, and qualitative agreement necessitates the use of our adapted procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation invites new and original contributions with the understanding that, if accepted, they will not be published elsewhere. Papers reporting new theories, methodology, and/or important applications in quantum electronic structure, molecular dynamics, and statistical mechanics are appropriate for submission to this Journal. Specific topics include advances in or applications of ab initio quantum mechanics, density functional theory, design and properties of new materials, surface science, Monte Carlo simulations, solvation models, QM/MM calculations, biomolecular structure prediction, and molecular dynamics in the broadest sense including gas-phase dynamics, ab initio dynamics, biomolecular dynamics, and protein folding. The Journal does not consider papers that are straightforward applications of known methods including DFT and molecular dynamics. The Journal favors submissions that include advances in theory or methodology with applications to compelling problems.
期刊最新文献
Electron-Spin Relaxation in Boron-Doped Graphene Nanoribbons. Does the Traditional Band Picture Correctly Describe the Electronic Structure of n-Doped Conjugated Polymers? A TD-DFT and Natural Transition Orbital Study. Determining the N-Representability of a Reduced Density Matrix via Unitary Evolution and Stochastic Sampling. Host-Guest Binding Free Energies à la Carte: An Automated OneOPES Protocol. How Sophisticated Are Neural Networks Needed to Predict Long-Term Nonadiabatic Dynamics?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1