自身免疫性风湿病分类标准中使用的自身抗体检测问题:实验室自身免疫学家的视角。

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Autoimmunity reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103604
Nicola Bizzaro , Alessio Mazzoni , Teresa Carbone , Luigi Cinquanta , Danilo Villalta , Antonella Radice , Giampaola Pesce , Mariangela Manfredi , Maria Infantino
{"title":"自身免疫性风湿病分类标准中使用的自身抗体检测问题:实验室自身免疫学家的视角。","authors":"Nicola Bizzaro ,&nbsp;Alessio Mazzoni ,&nbsp;Teresa Carbone ,&nbsp;Luigi Cinquanta ,&nbsp;Danilo Villalta ,&nbsp;Antonella Radice ,&nbsp;Giampaola Pesce ,&nbsp;Mariangela Manfredi ,&nbsp;Maria Infantino","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Classification criteria of autoimmune rheumatic diseases are an important means to define homogenous groups of patients that can be compared across studies for clinical trials and research purposes. The measurement of autoantibodies is a relevant aspect in the definition of classification criteria, with a significant weight in the scores necessary to classify patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The impact of autoantibodies has gradually increased over the years, contributing to the evolution and improvement of the classification criteria. However, these criteria often do not take into consideration how autoantibodies are measured, i.e. differences in diagnostic accuracy of the methods. This is a critical point especially when obsolete analytical methods that are no longer used in many clinical laboratories are taken into consideration. In this review we have critically examined assays and methods for the determination of autoantibodies that are (or could be) included among the classification criteria of autoimmune rheumatic diseases in light of more recent evidence and technology evolution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"23 9","pages":"Article 103604"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Issues in autoantibody tests used in the classification criteria for autoimmune rheumatic diseases: the laboratory autoimmunologist's perspective\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Bizzaro ,&nbsp;Alessio Mazzoni ,&nbsp;Teresa Carbone ,&nbsp;Luigi Cinquanta ,&nbsp;Danilo Villalta ,&nbsp;Antonella Radice ,&nbsp;Giampaola Pesce ,&nbsp;Mariangela Manfredi ,&nbsp;Maria Infantino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Classification criteria of autoimmune rheumatic diseases are an important means to define homogenous groups of patients that can be compared across studies for clinical trials and research purposes. The measurement of autoantibodies is a relevant aspect in the definition of classification criteria, with a significant weight in the scores necessary to classify patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The impact of autoantibodies has gradually increased over the years, contributing to the evolution and improvement of the classification criteria. However, these criteria often do not take into consideration how autoantibodies are measured, i.e. differences in diagnostic accuracy of the methods. This is a critical point especially when obsolete analytical methods that are no longer used in many clinical laboratories are taken into consideration. In this review we have critically examined assays and methods for the determination of autoantibodies that are (or could be) included among the classification criteria of autoimmune rheumatic diseases in light of more recent evidence and technology evolution.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autoimmunity reviews\",\"volume\":\"23 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 103604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autoimmunity reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997224000958\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmunity reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997224000958","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自身免疫性风湿病的分类标准是界定同质患者群体的重要手段,可用于临床试验和研究目的的不同研究之间的比较。自身抗体的测量是定义分类标准的一个相关方面,在对自身免疫性风湿病患者进行分类所需的评分中占有重要的权重。多年来,自身抗体的影响逐渐增大,促进了分类标准的演变和改进。然而,这些标准往往没有考虑到自身抗体的测量方法,即各种方法在诊断准确性上的差异。这是一个关键点,尤其是当考虑到许多临床实验室已不再使用的过时分析方法时。在这篇综述中,我们根据最新的证据和技术发展,对已列入(或可能列入)自身免疫性风湿病分类标准的自身抗体检测方法进行了严格审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Issues in autoantibody tests used in the classification criteria for autoimmune rheumatic diseases: the laboratory autoimmunologist's perspective

Classification criteria of autoimmune rheumatic diseases are an important means to define homogenous groups of patients that can be compared across studies for clinical trials and research purposes. The measurement of autoantibodies is a relevant aspect in the definition of classification criteria, with a significant weight in the scores necessary to classify patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The impact of autoantibodies has gradually increased over the years, contributing to the evolution and improvement of the classification criteria. However, these criteria often do not take into consideration how autoantibodies are measured, i.e. differences in diagnostic accuracy of the methods. This is a critical point especially when obsolete analytical methods that are no longer used in many clinical laboratories are taken into consideration. In this review we have critically examined assays and methods for the determination of autoantibodies that are (or could be) included among the classification criteria of autoimmune rheumatic diseases in light of more recent evidence and technology evolution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Autoimmunity reviews
Autoimmunity reviews 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
24.70
自引率
4.40%
发文量
164
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Autoimmunity Reviews is a publication that features up-to-date, structured reviews on various topics in the field of autoimmunity. These reviews are written by renowned experts and include demonstrative illustrations and tables. Each article will have a clear "take-home" message for readers. The selection of articles is primarily done by the Editors-in-Chief, based on recommendations from the international Editorial Board. The topics covered in the articles span all areas of autoimmunology, aiming to bridge the gap between basic and clinical sciences. In terms of content, the contributions in basic sciences delve into the pathophysiology and mechanisms of autoimmune disorders, as well as genomics and proteomics. On the other hand, clinical contributions focus on diseases related to autoimmunity, novel therapies, and clinical associations. Autoimmunity Reviews is internationally recognized, and its articles are indexed and abstracted in prestigious databases such as PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Biosciences Information Services, and Chemical Abstracts.
期刊最新文献
Anti-lipoprotein lipase antibodies: A review. MOGAD: A comprehensive review of clinicoradiological features, therapy and outcomes in 4699 patients globally. Advancing understanding of autoimmune disease-related interstitial lung disease (AD-ILD): A global perspective on research focus and future directions. Is it time for treat-to-target in antiphospholipid syndrome? Artificial intelligence meets the world experts; updates and novel therapies in autoimmunity - The 14th international congress on autoimmunity 2024 (AUTO14), Ljubljana.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1