引入 RefluxStop 治疗难治性胃食管反流病对意大利医疗系统的经济影响。

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS PharmacoEconomics Open Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1007/s41669-024-00521-7
Sam Harper, Muralikrishnan Kartha, Stuart Mealing, Maurizio Pavanello, Luigi Bonavina
{"title":"引入 RefluxStop 治疗难治性胃食管反流病对意大利医疗系统的经济影响。","authors":"Sam Harper, Muralikrishnan Kartha, Stuart Mealing, Maurizio Pavanello, Luigi Bonavina","doi":"10.1007/s41669-024-00521-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common ailment associated with troublesome symptoms. The standard of care in Italy involves initial treatment with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based medical management or laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) for patients unwilling to continue or intolerant of long-term PPI therapy. RefluxStop is a novel medical device, intended for laparoscopic implantation, that has recently proven to be an efficacious and cost-effective treatment option for patients with GERD. This analysis aims to describe the short-term budget impact of introducing RefluxStop as a GERD treatment option within the Italian National Health Service (SSN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A model adherent to international best practice recommendations was developed to estimate the budget impact of introducing RefluxStop over a 5-year time horizon. Two scenarios were considered: one without RefluxStop (i.e., comprising PPI therapy, LNF, and magnetic sphincter augmentation using the LINX system); and one with RefluxStop (i.e., addition of RefluxStop to the three treatment options previously mentioned). Clinical benefits and costs associated with each intervention were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 5 years, the introduction of RefluxStop resulted in avoidance of 95 surgical failures, 11 reoperations, and 64 endoscopic esophageal dilations. Introduction of RefluxStop resulted in an almost neutral impact on the existing budget with a 0.316% increase in the annual Italian SSN spending on GERD treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Introduction of RefluxStop as a GERD treatment option in Italy is likely to be associated with substantial clinical benefits and a marginal budget impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Economic Impact of Introducing RefluxStop for Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on the Italian Healthcare System.\",\"authors\":\"Sam Harper, Muralikrishnan Kartha, Stuart Mealing, Maurizio Pavanello, Luigi Bonavina\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41669-024-00521-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common ailment associated with troublesome symptoms. The standard of care in Italy involves initial treatment with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based medical management or laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) for patients unwilling to continue or intolerant of long-term PPI therapy. RefluxStop is a novel medical device, intended for laparoscopic implantation, that has recently proven to be an efficacious and cost-effective treatment option for patients with GERD. This analysis aims to describe the short-term budget impact of introducing RefluxStop as a GERD treatment option within the Italian National Health Service (SSN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A model adherent to international best practice recommendations was developed to estimate the budget impact of introducing RefluxStop over a 5-year time horizon. Two scenarios were considered: one without RefluxStop (i.e., comprising PPI therapy, LNF, and magnetic sphincter augmentation using the LINX system); and one with RefluxStop (i.e., addition of RefluxStop to the three treatment options previously mentioned). Clinical benefits and costs associated with each intervention were included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 5 years, the introduction of RefluxStop resulted in avoidance of 95 surgical failures, 11 reoperations, and 64 endoscopic esophageal dilations. Introduction of RefluxStop resulted in an almost neutral impact on the existing budget with a 0.316% increase in the annual Italian SSN spending on GERD treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Introduction of RefluxStop as a GERD treatment option in Italy is likely to be associated with substantial clinical benefits and a marginal budget impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PharmacoEconomics Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499547/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PharmacoEconomics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-024-00521-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-024-00521-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介胃食管反流病(GERD)是一种常见疾病,伴有令人烦恼的症状。意大利的标准治疗方法包括使用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)进行初始治疗,或对不愿继续或不耐受长期 PPI 治疗的患者采用腹腔镜尼森胃底折叠术(LNF)进行治疗。RefluxStop 是一种用于腹腔镜植入的新型医疗设备,近来已被证明是治疗胃食管反流病患者的一种有效且具有成本效益的治疗方案。本分析旨在描述在意大利国家医疗服务机构(SSN)中引入 RefluxStop 作为胃食管反流治疗方案的短期预算影响:方法:根据国际最佳实践建议开发了一个模型,用于估算在 5 年时间内引入 RefluxStop 对预算的影响。该模型考虑了两种方案:一种是不使用 RefluxStop 的方案(即包括 PPI 治疗、LNF 和使用 LINX 系统的磁性括约肌增强疗法);另一种是使用 RefluxStop 的方案(即在前述三种治疗方案的基础上增加 RefluxStop)。与每种干预措施相关的临床效益和成本都纳入了分析:在 5 年的时间里,RefluxStop 的引入避免了 95 例手术失败、11 例再次手术和 64 例内镜食管扩张术。引入 RefluxStop 对现有预算的影响几乎为零,意大利 SSN 每年用于治疗胃食管反流病的支出只增加了 0.316%:结论:在意大利引入 RefluxStop 作为胃食管反流病治疗方案可能会带来巨大的临床效益,对预算的影响微乎其微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Economic Impact of Introducing RefluxStop for Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on the Italian Healthcare System.

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common ailment associated with troublesome symptoms. The standard of care in Italy involves initial treatment with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based medical management or laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) for patients unwilling to continue or intolerant of long-term PPI therapy. RefluxStop is a novel medical device, intended for laparoscopic implantation, that has recently proven to be an efficacious and cost-effective treatment option for patients with GERD. This analysis aims to describe the short-term budget impact of introducing RefluxStop as a GERD treatment option within the Italian National Health Service (SSN).

Methods: A model adherent to international best practice recommendations was developed to estimate the budget impact of introducing RefluxStop over a 5-year time horizon. Two scenarios were considered: one without RefluxStop (i.e., comprising PPI therapy, LNF, and magnetic sphincter augmentation using the LINX system); and one with RefluxStop (i.e., addition of RefluxStop to the three treatment options previously mentioned). Clinical benefits and costs associated with each intervention were included in the analysis.

Results: Over 5 years, the introduction of RefluxStop resulted in avoidance of 95 surgical failures, 11 reoperations, and 64 endoscopic esophageal dilations. Introduction of RefluxStop resulted in an almost neutral impact on the existing budget with a 0.316% increase in the annual Italian SSN spending on GERD treatment.

Conclusion: Introduction of RefluxStop as a GERD treatment option in Italy is likely to be associated with substantial clinical benefits and a marginal budget impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Costs of Adverse Events in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma with First-Line Treatment. Digital Versus Paper-Based Consent from the UK NHS Perspective: A Micro-costing Analysis. Correction: Cost-Effectiveness of Dupilumab and Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Singapore. Publisher Correction: Health Technology Assessment Reports for Non-Oncology Medications in Canada from 2018 to 2022: Methodological Critiques on Manufacturers' Submissions and a Comparison Between Manufacturer and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) Analyses. Comparison of Two Financial Incentives to Encourage the Use of Adalimumab Biosimilars: Results of a French Experiment Close to Clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1