Jomana W Alsulaiman, Khalid A Kheirallah, Ahmad Alrawashdeh, Tareq Saleh, Maha Obeidat, Yareen J Alawneh, Ziydoun Abu Sanad, Wajdi Amayreh, Rama J Alawneh
{"title":"青霉素过敏儿童的风险分层:约旦横断面研究","authors":"Jomana W Alsulaiman, Khalid A Kheirallah, Ahmad Alrawashdeh, Tareq Saleh, Maha Obeidat, Yareen J Alawneh, Ziydoun Abu Sanad, Wajdi Amayreh, Rama J Alawneh","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S464511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementing allergy testing among children with a reported history of penicillin allergy could be challenging, particularly in developing countries with limited resources. This study screened and risk-stratified the likelihood of true penicillin allergy among children labeled with penicillin allergy in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey, completed by parents, assessed history, type, and severity of penicillin allergic reactions, including age at diagnosis, symptoms, time to the reaction, reaction's course and resolution, and received medical evaluation/testing. Low-risk allergic symptoms were defined as vomiting, diarrhea, headache, dizziness, itching, rash, cough, or runny nose without evidence of anaphylaxis or severe cutaneous reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 530 parents of \"penicillin allergy\"-labeled children completed the survey. Of these, 86.4% reported allergic reactions to penicillin and 13.6% reported avoidance of penicillin due to family history. Among the former, 52.2% were male, 67.3% were three years old or younger when the reported reaction was established, and 68.3% experienced exclusively low-risk symptoms. Overall, skin rash was the most reported symptom (86.0%). High-risk symptoms were reported in 31.5% of children. About two-thirds (64.0%) of children were reported to have experienced symptoms after the first exposure to penicillin. The most common indication for antibiotic use was a throat infection (63.8%). Asthma comorbidity was significantly higher among high-risk (24.8%) compared low-risk group (11.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Jordan, many parent-reported penicillin allergic reactions seem to be clinically insignificant and unlikely to be verifiable, which can adversely affect patients' care and antimicrobial stewardship. An appropriate clinical history/evaluation is a key step in identifying true immunoglobulin E-mediated allergic reactions and risk stratifying patients for either de-labeling those with obviously non-immune-mediated reactions or identifying candidates for direct oral challenge test.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Stratification of Penicillin Allergy Labeled Children: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan.\",\"authors\":\"Jomana W Alsulaiman, Khalid A Kheirallah, Ahmad Alrawashdeh, Tareq Saleh, Maha Obeidat, Yareen J Alawneh, Ziydoun Abu Sanad, Wajdi Amayreh, Rama J Alawneh\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/TCRM.S464511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementing allergy testing among children with a reported history of penicillin allergy could be challenging, particularly in developing countries with limited resources. This study screened and risk-stratified the likelihood of true penicillin allergy among children labeled with penicillin allergy in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey, completed by parents, assessed history, type, and severity of penicillin allergic reactions, including age at diagnosis, symptoms, time to the reaction, reaction's course and resolution, and received medical evaluation/testing. Low-risk allergic symptoms were defined as vomiting, diarrhea, headache, dizziness, itching, rash, cough, or runny nose without evidence of anaphylaxis or severe cutaneous reactions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 530 parents of \\\"penicillin allergy\\\"-labeled children completed the survey. Of these, 86.4% reported allergic reactions to penicillin and 13.6% reported avoidance of penicillin due to family history. Among the former, 52.2% were male, 67.3% were three years old or younger when the reported reaction was established, and 68.3% experienced exclusively low-risk symptoms. Overall, skin rash was the most reported symptom (86.0%). High-risk symptoms were reported in 31.5% of children. About two-thirds (64.0%) of children were reported to have experienced symptoms after the first exposure to penicillin. The most common indication for antibiotic use was a throat infection (63.8%). Asthma comorbidity was significantly higher among high-risk (24.8%) compared low-risk group (11.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Jordan, many parent-reported penicillin allergic reactions seem to be clinically insignificant and unlikely to be verifiable, which can adversely affect patients' care and antimicrobial stewardship. An appropriate clinical history/evaluation is a key step in identifying true immunoglobulin E-mediated allergic reactions and risk stratifying patients for either de-labeling those with obviously non-immune-mediated reactions or identifying candidates for direct oral challenge test.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346476/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S464511\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S464511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:对报告有青霉素过敏史的儿童进行过敏检测可能具有挑战性,尤其是在资源有限的发展中国家。本研究对约旦被标记为青霉素过敏的儿童进行了筛查,并对其真正青霉素过敏的可能性进行了风险分级:方法:由家长完成一项网络调查,评估青霉素过敏反应的病史、类型和严重程度,包括诊断时的年龄、症状、反应时间、反应过程和缓解情况,以及接受医疗评估/检测的情况。低风险过敏症状的定义是呕吐、腹泻、头痛、头晕、瘙痒、皮疹、咳嗽或流鼻涕,但无过敏性休克或严重皮肤反应的证据:共有 530 名 "青霉素过敏 "儿童的家长完成了调查。其中 86.4% 表示对青霉素过敏,13.6% 表示因家族病史而避免使用青霉素。在前者中,52.2%为男性,67.3%在报告过敏反应时年龄在三岁或三岁以下,68.3%仅出现过低危症状。总体而言,皮疹是报告最多的症状(86.0%)。31.5%的儿童出现了高危症状。据报告,约三分之二(64.0%)的儿童在首次接触青霉素后出现症状。最常见的抗生素使用指征是咽喉感染(63.8%)。与低风险组(11.5%)相比,高风险组(24.8%)的哮喘合并症明显更高:结论:在约旦,许多家长报告的青霉素过敏反应似乎在临床上并不严重,也不太可能被证实,这可能会对患者的护理和抗菌药物管理产生不利影响。适当的临床病史/评估是识别真正由免疫球蛋白 E 介导的过敏反应和对患者进行风险分层的关键步骤,可将明显非免疫介导反应的患者去标签化,或确定直接口服挑战试验的候选者。
Risk Stratification of Penicillin Allergy Labeled Children: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan.
Background: Implementing allergy testing among children with a reported history of penicillin allergy could be challenging, particularly in developing countries with limited resources. This study screened and risk-stratified the likelihood of true penicillin allergy among children labeled with penicillin allergy in Jordan.
Methods: A web-based survey, completed by parents, assessed history, type, and severity of penicillin allergic reactions, including age at diagnosis, symptoms, time to the reaction, reaction's course and resolution, and received medical evaluation/testing. Low-risk allergic symptoms were defined as vomiting, diarrhea, headache, dizziness, itching, rash, cough, or runny nose without evidence of anaphylaxis or severe cutaneous reactions.
Results: A total of 530 parents of "penicillin allergy"-labeled children completed the survey. Of these, 86.4% reported allergic reactions to penicillin and 13.6% reported avoidance of penicillin due to family history. Among the former, 52.2% were male, 67.3% were three years old or younger when the reported reaction was established, and 68.3% experienced exclusively low-risk symptoms. Overall, skin rash was the most reported symptom (86.0%). High-risk symptoms were reported in 31.5% of children. About two-thirds (64.0%) of children were reported to have experienced symptoms after the first exposure to penicillin. The most common indication for antibiotic use was a throat infection (63.8%). Asthma comorbidity was significantly higher among high-risk (24.8%) compared low-risk group (11.5%).
Conclusion: In Jordan, many parent-reported penicillin allergic reactions seem to be clinically insignificant and unlikely to be verifiable, which can adversely affect patients' care and antimicrobial stewardship. An appropriate clinical history/evaluation is a key step in identifying true immunoglobulin E-mediated allergic reactions and risk stratifying patients for either de-labeling those with obviously non-immune-mediated reactions or identifying candidates for direct oral challenge test.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas.
The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature.
As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.