战争期间的护士:基于轮廓的风险和保护因素。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Scholarship Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1111/jnu.13019
Hamama Liat, Amit Inbal, Itzhaki Michal
{"title":"战争期间的护士:基于轮廓的风险和保护因素。","authors":"Hamama Liat, Amit Inbal, Itzhaki Michal","doi":"10.1111/jnu.13019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nurses in southern Israel's public hospitals were exposed to unusual traumatic events following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, and the ensuing Swords of Iron War. This study aimed to clarify the complexity of wartime nursing by identifying profiles based on risk factors (i.e., psychological distress and adjustment disorders) and protective factors (i.e., positive affect (PA), resilience, and perceived social support [PSS]).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study utilizes a cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two hundred nurses at a major public hospital in southern Israel completed self-report questionnaires. A latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted to identify distinct profiles based on nurses' risk and protective factors. Differences in profiles were examined alongside sociodemographic and occupational variables and traumatic event exposure. The LPA was conducted using MPlus 8.8 Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) software.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Two distinct profiles were identified: \"reactive\" and \"resilient.\" The \"reactive\" group included nurses who had higher risk factor scores (psychological distress and adjustment disorder), whereas the \"resilient\" group included nurses who had higher protective factor scores (PA, resilience, and PSS). Furthermore, nurses in the \"reactive\" group were younger, with greater seniority, worse self-rated health, and a higher frequency of kidnapped family members compared to nurses from the \"resilient\" group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses in wartime are at risk if identified as \"reactive.\" Identifying these profiles can assist in developing effective support practices to help nurses cope with wartime challenges and maintain their mental well-being.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Healthcare organizations should tailor interventions to prepare and support nurses of various ages and experience levels, during and after conflicts. This approach aims to reduce risk factors and promote protective factors among nurses during wartime.</p>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses during war: Profiles-based risk and protective factors.\",\"authors\":\"Hamama Liat, Amit Inbal, Itzhaki Michal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jnu.13019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nurses in southern Israel's public hospitals were exposed to unusual traumatic events following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, and the ensuing Swords of Iron War. This study aimed to clarify the complexity of wartime nursing by identifying profiles based on risk factors (i.e., psychological distress and adjustment disorders) and protective factors (i.e., positive affect (PA), resilience, and perceived social support [PSS]).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study utilizes a cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two hundred nurses at a major public hospital in southern Israel completed self-report questionnaires. A latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted to identify distinct profiles based on nurses' risk and protective factors. Differences in profiles were examined alongside sociodemographic and occupational variables and traumatic event exposure. The LPA was conducted using MPlus 8.8 Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) software.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Two distinct profiles were identified: \\\"reactive\\\" and \\\"resilient.\\\" The \\\"reactive\\\" group included nurses who had higher risk factor scores (psychological distress and adjustment disorder), whereas the \\\"resilient\\\" group included nurses who had higher protective factor scores (PA, resilience, and PSS). Furthermore, nurses in the \\\"reactive\\\" group were younger, with greater seniority, worse self-rated health, and a higher frequency of kidnapped family members compared to nurses from the \\\"resilient\\\" group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses in wartime are at risk if identified as \\\"reactive.\\\" Identifying these profiles can assist in developing effective support practices to help nurses cope with wartime challenges and maintain their mental well-being.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Healthcare organizations should tailor interventions to prepare and support nurses of various ages and experience levels, during and after conflicts. This approach aims to reduce risk factors and promote protective factors among nurses during wartime.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Scholarship\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Scholarship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.13019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.13019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在 2023 年 10 月 7 日哈马斯袭击以色列以及随后的 "铁之剑 "战争之后,以色列南部公立医院的护士面临着不同寻常的创伤事件。本研究旨在通过识别基于风险因素(即心理困扰和适应障碍)和保护因素(即积极情绪(PA)、复原力和感知社会支持[PSS])的特征来阐明战时护理的复杂性:本研究采用横断面设计:方法:以色列南部一家大型公立医院的 200 名护士填写了自我报告问卷。进行了潜在特征分析(LPA),根据护士的风险因素和保护因素确定了不同的特征。在研究社会人口学和职业变量以及创伤事件暴露的同时,还研究了特征的差异。LPA 使用 MPlus 8.8 结构方程建模(SEM)软件进行:发现了两种不同的特征:"反应型 "和 "复原型"。反应性 "组包括风险因素得分(心理困扰和适应障碍)较高的护士,而 "复原性 "组包括保护因素得分(PA、复原力和 PSS)较高的护士。此外,与 "恢复力强 "组的护士相比,"反应力强 "组的护士更年轻、资历更深、自评健康状况更差、家庭成员被绑架的频率更高:结论:如果被认定为 "反应性",战时护士就会面临风险。识别这些特征有助于制定有效的支持措施,帮助护士应对战时挑战并保持心理健康:医疗机构应量身定制干预措施,在冲突期间和冲突后为不同年龄和经验水平的护士提供准备和支持。这种方法旨在减少战时护士的风险因素并促进保护因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nurses during war: Profiles-based risk and protective factors.

Introduction: Nurses in southern Israel's public hospitals were exposed to unusual traumatic events following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel, and the ensuing Swords of Iron War. This study aimed to clarify the complexity of wartime nursing by identifying profiles based on risk factors (i.e., psychological distress and adjustment disorders) and protective factors (i.e., positive affect (PA), resilience, and perceived social support [PSS]).

Design: This study utilizes a cross-sectional design.

Method: Two hundred nurses at a major public hospital in southern Israel completed self-report questionnaires. A latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted to identify distinct profiles based on nurses' risk and protective factors. Differences in profiles were examined alongside sociodemographic and occupational variables and traumatic event exposure. The LPA was conducted using MPlus 8.8 Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) software.

Findings: Two distinct profiles were identified: "reactive" and "resilient." The "reactive" group included nurses who had higher risk factor scores (psychological distress and adjustment disorder), whereas the "resilient" group included nurses who had higher protective factor scores (PA, resilience, and PSS). Furthermore, nurses in the "reactive" group were younger, with greater seniority, worse self-rated health, and a higher frequency of kidnapped family members compared to nurses from the "resilient" group.

Conclusion: Nurses in wartime are at risk if identified as "reactive." Identifying these profiles can assist in developing effective support practices to help nurses cope with wartime challenges and maintain their mental well-being.

Clinical relevance: Healthcare organizations should tailor interventions to prepare and support nurses of various ages and experience levels, during and after conflicts. This approach aims to reduce risk factors and promote protective factors among nurses during wartime.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
期刊最新文献
Applying natural language processing to understand symptoms among older adults home healthcare patients with urinary incontinence. The efficacy of behavioral sleep intervention on sleep problems among children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A randomized controlled trial. PICOT questions and search strategies formulation: A novel approach using artificial intelligence automation. Low-value and high-value care recommendations in nursing: A systematic assessment of clinical practice guidelines. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1