肾病中的缺氧诱导因子脯氨酰羟化酶抑制剂

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2300189
Jeffrey T Ha, Swapnil Hiremath, Min Jun, Suetonia C Green, David C Wheeler, Daniel W Coyne, Vlado Perkovic, Sunil V Badve
{"title":"肾病中的缺氧诱导因子脯氨酰羟化酶抑制剂","authors":"Jeffrey T Ha, Swapnil Hiremath, Min Jun, Suetonia C Green, David C Wheeler, Daniel W Coyne, Vlado Perkovic, Sunil V Badve","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2300189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors are an oral treatment for anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed long-term safety of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized trials comparing HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) or placebo with greater than or equal to 48 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Treatment effects were pooled using random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five trials involving 26,478 participants were included. Of these, 13 trials enrolled 13,230 participants with dialysis-dependent CKD, and 12 trials enrolled 13,248 participants with nondialysis-dependent CKD. There was no evidence that HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA had different effects on MACE in people with dialysis-dependent CKD (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.08) or people with nondialysis-dependent CKD (risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.22). Similarly, there was no evidence that HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and placebo had different effects on MACE (risk ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.27) in people with nondialysis-dependent CKD. The lack of difference between HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA or placebo was observed for individual components of MACE and cardiovascular death. Safety of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors for other outcomes was comparable with ESA in dialysis-dependent CKD. In nondialysis-dependent CKD, dialysis access thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, infections, and hyperkalemia occurred more frequently with HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors in placebo-controlled trials but not in ESA-controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no evidence of a difference in the long-term cardiovascular safety profile of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA in adults with dialysis-dependent CKD and adults with nondialysis-dependent CKD. (PROSPERO registration number, CRD42021278011.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"3 9","pages":"EVIDoa2300189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors in Kidney Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey T Ha, Swapnil Hiremath, Min Jun, Suetonia C Green, David C Wheeler, Daniel W Coyne, Vlado Perkovic, Sunil V Badve\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/EVIDoa2300189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors are an oral treatment for anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed long-term safety of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized trials comparing HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) or placebo with greater than or equal to 48 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Treatment effects were pooled using random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five trials involving 26,478 participants were included. Of these, 13 trials enrolled 13,230 participants with dialysis-dependent CKD, and 12 trials enrolled 13,248 participants with nondialysis-dependent CKD. There was no evidence that HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA had different effects on MACE in people with dialysis-dependent CKD (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.08) or people with nondialysis-dependent CKD (risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.22). Similarly, there was no evidence that HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and placebo had different effects on MACE (risk ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.27) in people with nondialysis-dependent CKD. The lack of difference between HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA or placebo was observed for individual components of MACE and cardiovascular death. Safety of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors for other outcomes was comparable with ESA in dialysis-dependent CKD. In nondialysis-dependent CKD, dialysis access thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, infections, and hyperkalemia occurred more frequently with HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors in placebo-controlled trials but not in ESA-controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no evidence of a difference in the long-term cardiovascular safety profile of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA in adults with dialysis-dependent CKD and adults with nondialysis-dependent CKD. (PROSPERO registration number, CRD42021278011.).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEJM evidence\",\"volume\":\"3 9\",\"pages\":\"EVIDoa2300189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEJM evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2300189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2300189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:缺氧诱导因子(HIF)脯氨酰羟化酶抑制剂是一种治疗慢性肾脏病(CKD)贫血的口服药物。在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们评估了HIF脯氨酰羟化酶抑制剂的长期安全性:我们在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中检索了比较 HIF 脯氨酰羟化酶抑制剂与红细胞生成刺激剂 (ESA) 或安慰剂的随机试验,随访时间大于或等于 48 周。主要结果是主要心血管不良事件(MACE),定义为全因死亡、心肌梗死或中风的综合结果。采用随机效应模型对治疗效果进行汇总:共纳入了 25 项试验,参与人数达 26,478 人。其中,13 项试验招募了 13,230 名透析依赖型 CKD 患者,12 项试验招募了 13,248 名非透析依赖型 CKD 患者。没有证据表明HIF脯氨酰羟化酶抑制剂和ESA对透析依赖型CKD患者(风险比为0.99;95%置信区间[CI]为0.92至1.08)或非透析依赖型CKD患者(风险比为1.08;95%置信区间为0.95至1.22)的MACE有不同的影响。同样,没有证据表明HIF脯氨酰羟化酶抑制剂和安慰剂对非透析依赖性CKD患者的MACE有不同影响(风险比为1.10;95% CI为0.96至1.27)。HIF脯氨酰羟化酶抑制剂与ESA或安慰剂之间在MACE和心血管死亡的各个组成部分上没有差异。在透析依赖型慢性肾脏病患者中,HIF脯氨酰羟化酶抑制剂对其他结果的安全性与ESA相当。在非透析依赖型 CKD 患者中,在安慰剂对照试验中,HIF 丙二酰羟化酶抑制剂更易导致透析通路血栓形成、静脉血栓栓塞、感染和高钾血症,而在 ESA 对照试验中则没有这种情况:没有证据表明,在透析依赖型慢性肾脏病成人患者和非透析依赖型慢性肾脏病成人患者中,HIF脯氨酰羟化酶抑制剂和ESA的长期心血管安全性存在差异。(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42021278011)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors in Kidney Disease.

Background: Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors are an oral treatment for anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed long-term safety of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized trials comparing HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) or placebo with greater than or equal to 48 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Treatment effects were pooled using random-effects models.

Results: Twenty-five trials involving 26,478 participants were included. Of these, 13 trials enrolled 13,230 participants with dialysis-dependent CKD, and 12 trials enrolled 13,248 participants with nondialysis-dependent CKD. There was no evidence that HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA had different effects on MACE in people with dialysis-dependent CKD (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.08) or people with nondialysis-dependent CKD (risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.22). Similarly, there was no evidence that HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and placebo had different effects on MACE (risk ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.27) in people with nondialysis-dependent CKD. The lack of difference between HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA or placebo was observed for individual components of MACE and cardiovascular death. Safety of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors for other outcomes was comparable with ESA in dialysis-dependent CKD. In nondialysis-dependent CKD, dialysis access thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, infections, and hyperkalemia occurred more frequently with HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors in placebo-controlled trials but not in ESA-controlled trials.

Conclusions: There was no evidence of a difference in the long-term cardiovascular safety profile of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors and ESA in adults with dialysis-dependent CKD and adults with nondialysis-dependent CKD. (PROSPERO registration number, CRD42021278011.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Pressure Targets for Adults with Vasodilatory Shock - An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. BNC210, an α7 Nicotinic Receptor Modulator, in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. A Meta-Analysis of Levofloxacin for Contacts of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Treating Patients, Not P Values. A 50-Year-Old Man with Left-Sided Weakness and Difficulty Speaking Clearly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1