无需全身抗凝的血液透析:评估高出血风险患者五种策略的随机对照试验。

Pedro H Franca Gois, David McIntyre, Sharad Ratanjee, Anita Pelecanos, Carla Scuderi, Chungun L Janoschka, Kara Summers, Haibing Wu, Belinda Elford, Dwarakanathan Ranganathan, Helen G Healy
{"title":"无需全身抗凝的血液透析:评估高出血风险患者五种策略的随机对照试验。","authors":"Pedro H Franca Gois, David McIntyre, Sharad Ratanjee, Anita Pelecanos, Carla Scuderi, Chungun L Janoschka, Kara Summers, Haibing Wu, Belinda Elford, Dwarakanathan Ranganathan, Helen G Healy","doi":"10.3390/medsci12030038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been growing interest in exploring combined interventions to achieve a more effective heparin-free treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>to evaluate combination of interventions compared to standard practice (intermittent flushes) to prevent clotting and consequently reduce premature interruptions of hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This open-label randomized controlled trial recruited chronic hemodialysis patients with contra-indication to systemic heparinization. Participants were randomized into one of five groups to receive different strategies of heparin-free hemodialysis treatment for up to three sessions.</p><p><strong>Primary endpoint: </strong>the successful completion of hemodialysis without clotting.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>the clotting of the air traps assessed by a semi-quantitative scale, online KT/V, and safety of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty participants were recruited and randomized between May and December 2020. Participants showed similar baseline biochemistry results and coagulation profiles. The highest success rates were observed in group 3 (heparin-coated dialyzers combined with intermittent flushes) (100%) and group 5 (hemodiafiltration with online predilution combined with heparin-coated dialyzers), with 91% vs. the control (intermittent flushes) (64%). Group 2 (heparin-coated dialyzers alone) had the poorest success rate, with 38% of the sessions being prematurely terminated due to clotting. KT/V and clotting scores were similar between groups. No adverse events related to the trial interventions were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed combination of interventions may have had additive effects, leading to less frequent clotting and the premature termination of an HD/HDF session. Our study supports the feasibility of conducting a larger randomized controlled trial focusing on the efficacy of combined interventions for heparin-free HD in patients with a high risk of bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemodialysis without Systemic Anticoagulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Five Strategies in Patients at a High Risk of Bleeding.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro H Franca Gois, David McIntyre, Sharad Ratanjee, Anita Pelecanos, Carla Scuderi, Chungun L Janoschka, Kara Summers, Haibing Wu, Belinda Elford, Dwarakanathan Ranganathan, Helen G Healy\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medsci12030038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been growing interest in exploring combined interventions to achieve a more effective heparin-free treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>to evaluate combination of interventions compared to standard practice (intermittent flushes) to prevent clotting and consequently reduce premature interruptions of hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This open-label randomized controlled trial recruited chronic hemodialysis patients with contra-indication to systemic heparinization. Participants were randomized into one of five groups to receive different strategies of heparin-free hemodialysis treatment for up to three sessions.</p><p><strong>Primary endpoint: </strong>the successful completion of hemodialysis without clotting.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>the clotting of the air traps assessed by a semi-quantitative scale, online KT/V, and safety of the interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty participants were recruited and randomized between May and December 2020. Participants showed similar baseline biochemistry results and coagulation profiles. The highest success rates were observed in group 3 (heparin-coated dialyzers combined with intermittent flushes) (100%) and group 5 (hemodiafiltration with online predilution combined with heparin-coated dialyzers), with 91% vs. the control (intermittent flushes) (64%). Group 2 (heparin-coated dialyzers alone) had the poorest success rate, with 38% of the sessions being prematurely terminated due to clotting. KT/V and clotting scores were similar between groups. No adverse events related to the trial interventions were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed combination of interventions may have had additive effects, leading to less frequent clotting and the premature termination of an HD/HDF session. Our study supports the feasibility of conducting a larger randomized controlled trial focusing on the efficacy of combined interventions for heparin-free HD in patients with a high risk of bleeding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348230/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci12030038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci12030038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:与标准做法(间歇性冲洗)相比,评估综合干预措施对预防凝血的作用,从而减少血液透析的过早中断:这项开放标签随机对照试验招募了有全身肝素化禁忌症的慢性血液透析患者。主要终点:成功完成血液透析且无凝血。次要结果:通过半定量量表评估空气捕集器的凝血情况、在线 KT/V 和干预措施的安全性:2020 年 5 月至 12 月期间,共招募了 40 名参与者并对其进行了随机分组。参与者的基线生化结果和凝血特征相似。成功率最高的是第 3 组(肝素涂层透析器与间歇冲洗相结合)(100%)和第 5 组(在线预稀释血液滤过与肝素涂层透析器相结合),成功率为 91%,而对照组(间歇冲洗)为 64%。第 2 组(仅使用肝素涂层透析器)的成功率最低,38% 的疗程因凝血而提前结束。各组的 KT/V 和凝血评分相似。未观察到与试验干预相关的不良事件:结论:建议的干预措施组合可能会产生叠加效应,从而减少凝血和提前终止 HD/HDF 治疗的频率。我们的研究支持开展更大规模的随机对照试验的可行性,该试验的重点是对出血风险高的患者进行无肝素 HD 联合干预的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hemodialysis without Systemic Anticoagulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Five Strategies in Patients at a High Risk of Bleeding.

Background: There has been growing interest in exploring combined interventions to achieve a more effective heparin-free treatment approach.

Aim: to evaluate combination of interventions compared to standard practice (intermittent flushes) to prevent clotting and consequently reduce premature interruptions of hemodialysis.

Methods: This open-label randomized controlled trial recruited chronic hemodialysis patients with contra-indication to systemic heparinization. Participants were randomized into one of five groups to receive different strategies of heparin-free hemodialysis treatment for up to three sessions.

Primary endpoint: the successful completion of hemodialysis without clotting.

Secondary outcomes: the clotting of the air traps assessed by a semi-quantitative scale, online KT/V, and safety of the interventions.

Results: Forty participants were recruited and randomized between May and December 2020. Participants showed similar baseline biochemistry results and coagulation profiles. The highest success rates were observed in group 3 (heparin-coated dialyzers combined with intermittent flushes) (100%) and group 5 (hemodiafiltration with online predilution combined with heparin-coated dialyzers), with 91% vs. the control (intermittent flushes) (64%). Group 2 (heparin-coated dialyzers alone) had the poorest success rate, with 38% of the sessions being prematurely terminated due to clotting. KT/V and clotting scores were similar between groups. No adverse events related to the trial interventions were observed.

Conclusions: The proposed combination of interventions may have had additive effects, leading to less frequent clotting and the premature termination of an HD/HDF session. Our study supports the feasibility of conducting a larger randomized controlled trial focusing on the efficacy of combined interventions for heparin-free HD in patients with a high risk of bleeding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Telemonitoring and Telehealth Coaching on General Nutrition Knowledge in Overweight and Obese Individuals: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Hemin Promotes Higher Effectiveness of Aminolevulinic-Photodynamic Therapy (ALA-PDT) in A549 Lung Cancer Cell Line by Interrupting ABCG2 Expression. Quantum Computing in Medicine. The Correlation of Bile Duct Dilatation in Postmortem Computed Tomography of Lethal Intoxication Cases for Different Drug Types-A Retrospective Study. Beta-Blocker Use in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1