与非跑步者相比,跑步者胃内侧有更多潜在的肌筋膜触发点

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.08.016
Anh Phong Nguyen , Christophe Broy , Louise Cardon , Gregoire Jet , Christine Detrembleur , Philippe Mahaudens
{"title":"与非跑步者相比,跑步者胃内侧有更多潜在的肌筋膜触发点","authors":"Anh Phong Nguyen ,&nbsp;Christophe Broy ,&nbsp;Louise Cardon ,&nbsp;Gregoire Jet ,&nbsp;Christine Detrembleur ,&nbsp;Philippe Mahaudens","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The goals of this study were to i. describe the prevalence of latent myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the medialis gastrocnemius in runners versus non-runners, and ii. examine their level of pain and stiffness.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Healthy runners and non-runners were recruited. Each participant's medialis gastrocnemius MTrPs count was recorded in both legs. The mean pain and the most painful MTrPs pain levels were recorded using an algometer, and the stiffness was evaluated using myotonometry (MyotonPro device) on the most painful MTrP.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With a medium effect size (p = 0.001), runners (n = 20) showed significantly more latent MTrPs than non-runners (n = 26). Runners also reported higher overall pain on the latent MTrPs site than non-runners (p = 0.003) and a significant difference (p = 0.001) for the most painful latent MTrP. Runners were substantially stiffer than non-runners in the most painful latent MTrP, with a mean stiffness difference of +9.98 N/m (p = 0.018, medium effect size).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Runners have a higher number of latent MTrPs than non-runners. The MTrPs found in runners' legs were more painful and stiff than those found in non-runners' legs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Runners have more latent myofascial trigger point than non-runners in medialis gastrocnemii\",\"authors\":\"Anh Phong Nguyen ,&nbsp;Christophe Broy ,&nbsp;Louise Cardon ,&nbsp;Gregoire Jet ,&nbsp;Christine Detrembleur ,&nbsp;Philippe Mahaudens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.08.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The goals of this study were to i. describe the prevalence of latent myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the medialis gastrocnemius in runners versus non-runners, and ii. examine their level of pain and stiffness.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Healthy runners and non-runners were recruited. Each participant's medialis gastrocnemius MTrPs count was recorded in both legs. The mean pain and the most painful MTrPs pain levels were recorded using an algometer, and the stiffness was evaluated using myotonometry (MyotonPro device) on the most painful MTrP.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With a medium effect size (p = 0.001), runners (n = 20) showed significantly more latent MTrPs than non-runners (n = 26). Runners also reported higher overall pain on the latent MTrPs site than non-runners (p = 0.003) and a significant difference (p = 0.001) for the most painful latent MTrP. Runners were substantially stiffer than non-runners in the most painful latent MTrP, with a mean stiffness difference of +9.98 N/m (p = 0.018, medium effect size).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Runners have a higher number of latent MTrPs than non-runners. The MTrPs found in runners' legs were more painful and stiff than those found in non-runners' legs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224004091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是:i. 描述跑步者与非跑步者腓肠肌内侧潜在肌筋膜触发点(MTrPs)的患病率;ii. 检查他们的疼痛和僵硬程度。记录每位参与者双腿内侧腓肠肌 MTrPs 计数。结果中等效应大小(p = 0.001),跑步者(n = 20)比非跑步者(n = 26)显示出明显更多的潜伏 MTrPs。与非跑步者相比,跑步者在潜伏 MTrPs部位的总体疼痛程度更高(p = 0.003),而且在最疼痛的潜伏 MTrP 方面存在显著差异(p = 0.001)。在最疼痛的潜伏 MTrP 上,跑步者比非跑步者僵硬得多,平均僵硬度差异为 +9.98 N/m(p = 0.018,中等效应大小)。跑步者腿部发现的 MTrPs 比非跑步者腿部发现的 MTrPs 更加疼痛和僵硬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Runners have more latent myofascial trigger point than non-runners in medialis gastrocnemii

Objectives

The goals of this study were to i. describe the prevalence of latent myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the medialis gastrocnemius in runners versus non-runners, and ii. examine their level of pain and stiffness.

Methods

Healthy runners and non-runners were recruited. Each participant's medialis gastrocnemius MTrPs count was recorded in both legs. The mean pain and the most painful MTrPs pain levels were recorded using an algometer, and the stiffness was evaluated using myotonometry (MyotonPro device) on the most painful MTrP.

Results

With a medium effect size (p = 0.001), runners (n = 20) showed significantly more latent MTrPs than non-runners (n = 26). Runners also reported higher overall pain on the latent MTrPs site than non-runners (p = 0.003) and a significant difference (p = 0.001) for the most painful latent MTrP. Runners were substantially stiffer than non-runners in the most painful latent MTrP, with a mean stiffness difference of +9.98 N/m (p = 0.018, medium effect size).

Conclusions

Runners have a higher number of latent MTrPs than non-runners. The MTrPs found in runners' legs were more painful and stiff than those found in non-runners' legs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of craniocervical posture after myofascial pain treatment in adults with bruxism: A randomized clinical trial How effective is proprioception exercise on pain, grip force, dexterity and proprioception of elbow joint in patients with tennis elbow? A randomized controlled trial Effectiveness of a cervical treatment in wind-instrument musicians with temporomandibular dysfunction: A randomized clinical trial Preventive effect of foam rolling on muscle soreness after exercise: A systematic review and meta-analysis Effectiveness of the scapula mobilization technique on the neural mechanosensitivity of the upper limb neural test 1 in individuals with mechanical cervicalgia. A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1