患有唐氏综合征的成年人和神经正常者的乳突肌压痛阈值和触觉反应:横断面研究

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.07.047
Letícia Abdelnour Zuanon , Juliana Dela Líbera , João Victor Soares Rodrigues , Pedro Henrique Petrilli , Alexia Ribeiro Horikawa , Márcio José Possari dos Santos , Letícia Helena Theodoro , Karina Helga Leal Turcio
{"title":"患有唐氏综合征的成年人和神经正常者的乳突肌压痛阈值和触觉反应:横断面研究","authors":"Letícia Abdelnour Zuanon ,&nbsp;Juliana Dela Líbera ,&nbsp;João Victor Soares Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Pedro Henrique Petrilli ,&nbsp;Alexia Ribeiro Horikawa ,&nbsp;Márcio José Possari dos Santos ,&nbsp;Letícia Helena Theodoro ,&nbsp;Karina Helga Leal Turcio","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.07.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Down Syndrome (DS) is currently the most common chromosomal condition associated with intellectual disability in the global population and is characterized by a variety of additional clinical findings. Individuals with DS may exhibit altered perception and reaction to painful stimuli, which makes the diagnosis of pain in DS a challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the pressure pain threshold of the masticatory muscles and the reaction to social touch in individuals with DS compared to neurotypical individuals (NT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with DS and NT individuals were included following predefined inclusion criteria. The assessment and comparison methods used between the groups were: 1) Algometry to quantify the pressure pain threshold of the masseter, temporal, and abductor pollicis brevis; 2) Social Touch Questionnaire (STQ) to assess social touch acceptance. Data obtained from the assessments were submitted to normality tests to determine if they followed a normal distribution. The Pressure Pain Threshold data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, while the Social Touch data were analyzed using the student's t-test, both with a significance level of 5%.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 32 patients were included in the study, sixteen with DS and sixteen NT individuals. The results showed that the pressure pain threshold of all analyzed muscles in the DS group was significantly higher (p &lt; 0.001) than in the NT group. However, social touch acceptance was similar between the two groups (p = 0.270).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>It was concluded that the pressure pain threshold is significantly higher in individuals with DS compared to NT, but social touch acceptance is similar between the groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressure pain threshold of the mastigatory muscles and reaction to touch in adults with down syndrome and neurotypicals: cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Letícia Abdelnour Zuanon ,&nbsp;Juliana Dela Líbera ,&nbsp;João Victor Soares Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Pedro Henrique Petrilli ,&nbsp;Alexia Ribeiro Horikawa ,&nbsp;Márcio José Possari dos Santos ,&nbsp;Letícia Helena Theodoro ,&nbsp;Karina Helga Leal Turcio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.07.047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Down Syndrome (DS) is currently the most common chromosomal condition associated with intellectual disability in the global population and is characterized by a variety of additional clinical findings. Individuals with DS may exhibit altered perception and reaction to painful stimuli, which makes the diagnosis of pain in DS a challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the pressure pain threshold of the masticatory muscles and the reaction to social touch in individuals with DS compared to neurotypical individuals (NT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with DS and NT individuals were included following predefined inclusion criteria. The assessment and comparison methods used between the groups were: 1) Algometry to quantify the pressure pain threshold of the masseter, temporal, and abductor pollicis brevis; 2) Social Touch Questionnaire (STQ) to assess social touch acceptance. Data obtained from the assessments were submitted to normality tests to determine if they followed a normal distribution. The Pressure Pain Threshold data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, while the Social Touch data were analyzed using the student's t-test, both with a significance level of 5%.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 32 patients were included in the study, sixteen with DS and sixteen NT individuals. The results showed that the pressure pain threshold of all analyzed muscles in the DS group was significantly higher (p &lt; 0.001) than in the NT group. However, social touch acceptance was similar between the two groups (p = 0.270).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>It was concluded that the pressure pain threshold is significantly higher in individuals with DS compared to NT, but social touch acceptance is similar between the groups.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003826\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景唐氏综合征(Down Syndrome,DS)是目前全球人口中最常见的伴有智力障碍的染色体疾病,其特点是有多种额外的临床表现。DS患者对疼痛刺激的感知和反应可能会发生改变,这使得DS患者的疼痛诊断成为一项挑战。本研究旨在评估与神经畸形患者(NT)相比,DS患者咀嚼肌的压痛阈值和对社会触摸的反应。两组间的评估和比较方法如下1) Algometry,用于量化颌间肌、颞肌和拇趾外展肌的压力痛阈值;2) Social Touch Questionnaire (STQ),用于评估社会触摸的接受程度。从评估中获得的数据均经过正态性测试,以确定其是否符合正态分布。压痛阈值数据采用 Mann-Whitney 检验进行分析,社交触觉数据采用学生 t 检验进行分析,显著性水平均为 5%。结果显示,DS 组所有分析肌肉的压痛阈值均明显高于 NT 组(p < 0.001)。结论 DS 患者的压痛阈值明显高于 NT 患者,但两组患者对社会触摸的接受程度相似(p = 0.270)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pressure pain threshold of the mastigatory muscles and reaction to touch in adults with down syndrome and neurotypicals: cross-sectional study

Background

Down Syndrome (DS) is currently the most common chromosomal condition associated with intellectual disability in the global population and is characterized by a variety of additional clinical findings. Individuals with DS may exhibit altered perception and reaction to painful stimuli, which makes the diagnosis of pain in DS a challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the pressure pain threshold of the masticatory muscles and the reaction to social touch in individuals with DS compared to neurotypical individuals (NT).

Methods

Patients with DS and NT individuals were included following predefined inclusion criteria. The assessment and comparison methods used between the groups were: 1) Algometry to quantify the pressure pain threshold of the masseter, temporal, and abductor pollicis brevis; 2) Social Touch Questionnaire (STQ) to assess social touch acceptance. Data obtained from the assessments were submitted to normality tests to determine if they followed a normal distribution. The Pressure Pain Threshold data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, while the Social Touch data were analyzed using the student's t-test, both with a significance level of 5%.

Results

A total of 32 patients were included in the study, sixteen with DS and sixteen NT individuals. The results showed that the pressure pain threshold of all analyzed muscles in the DS group was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in the NT group. However, social touch acceptance was similar between the two groups (p = 0.270).

Conclusions

It was concluded that the pressure pain threshold is significantly higher in individuals with DS compared to NT, but social touch acceptance is similar between the groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of craniocervical posture after myofascial pain treatment in adults with bruxism: A randomized clinical trial How effective is proprioception exercise on pain, grip force, dexterity and proprioception of elbow joint in patients with tennis elbow? A randomized controlled trial Effectiveness of a cervical treatment in wind-instrument musicians with temporomandibular dysfunction: A randomized clinical trial Preventive effect of foam rolling on muscle soreness after exercise: A systematic review and meta-analysis Effectiveness of the scapula mobilization technique on the neural mechanosensitivity of the upper limb neural test 1 in individuals with mechanical cervicalgia. A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1