英语作为外语学习者的元认知经验与写作发展:解读 EFL 写作学习过程

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Learning and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102540
Qiyu Sun , Lawrence Jun Zhang , Susan Carter
{"title":"英语作为外语学习者的元认知经验与写作发展:解读 EFL 写作学习过程","authors":"Qiyu Sun ,&nbsp;Lawrence Jun Zhang ,&nbsp;Susan Carter","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Much research has investigated students' metacognitive growth focusing on their metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive strategies as individual differences in learning to write in a second/foreign language (L2). Yet to date, changes in metacognitive experiences when learning to write, a subcategory of metacognition, have been insufficiently scrutinized. To bridge this gap, we employed a mixed-methods approach to examine learners' development in English as a foreign language (EFL), capturing their metacognitive experiences longitudinally. Specifically, we investigated the changes in 390 EFL learners' metacognitive experiences in writing and their writing development over one semester. A questionnaire was used to measure these learners' metacognitive experiences over two writing tasks, capturing metacognitive judgments, metacognitive feelings, online task-specific metacognitive knowledge, and online task-specific metacognitive strategies. We selected 12 participants for follow-up semi-structured interviews. We processed the quantitative data using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to identify these EFL learners' metacognitive experience profiles. Findings of LPA using Mplus 8.3 revealed two metacognitive experiences profiles, characterized by intensive and less intensive metacognitive experiences. Further quantitative analysis using paired samples <em>t</em>-tests in SPSS 24.0 indicated that EFL learners' metacognitive experiences changed in alignment with their writing development in terms of lexical complexity, syntactic complexity, fluency, and overall writing scores. Qualitative findings from thematic analysis using NVivo 12 identified two factors affecting the changes in EFL learners' metacognitive experiences, including their involvement in writing and development in linguistic competence. As is evident, the quantitative and qualitative findings point to a more nuanced and precise understanding of the changes in these EFL learners' metacognitive experiences in learning to write.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 102540"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104160802400133X/pdfft?md5=7f8b5bcd735efea2f3240af2e3a33fd8&pid=1-s2.0-S104160802400133X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"English as a foreign language learners' metacognitive experiences and writing development: Unraveling the process of learning EFL writing\",\"authors\":\"Qiyu Sun ,&nbsp;Lawrence Jun Zhang ,&nbsp;Susan Carter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Much research has investigated students' metacognitive growth focusing on their metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive strategies as individual differences in learning to write in a second/foreign language (L2). Yet to date, changes in metacognitive experiences when learning to write, a subcategory of metacognition, have been insufficiently scrutinized. To bridge this gap, we employed a mixed-methods approach to examine learners' development in English as a foreign language (EFL), capturing their metacognitive experiences longitudinally. Specifically, we investigated the changes in 390 EFL learners' metacognitive experiences in writing and their writing development over one semester. A questionnaire was used to measure these learners' metacognitive experiences over two writing tasks, capturing metacognitive judgments, metacognitive feelings, online task-specific metacognitive knowledge, and online task-specific metacognitive strategies. We selected 12 participants for follow-up semi-structured interviews. We processed the quantitative data using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to identify these EFL learners' metacognitive experience profiles. Findings of LPA using Mplus 8.3 revealed two metacognitive experiences profiles, characterized by intensive and less intensive metacognitive experiences. Further quantitative analysis using paired samples <em>t</em>-tests in SPSS 24.0 indicated that EFL learners' metacognitive experiences changed in alignment with their writing development in terms of lexical complexity, syntactic complexity, fluency, and overall writing scores. Qualitative findings from thematic analysis using NVivo 12 identified two factors affecting the changes in EFL learners' metacognitive experiences, including their involvement in writing and development in linguistic competence. As is evident, the quantitative and qualitative findings point to a more nuanced and precise understanding of the changes in these EFL learners' metacognitive experiences in learning to write.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104160802400133X/pdfft?md5=7f8b5bcd735efea2f3240af2e3a33fd8&pid=1-s2.0-S104160802400133X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104160802400133X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104160802400133X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多研究都对学生的元认知成长进行了调查,重点关注他们在学习第二语言/外语(L2)写作时的元认知知识和元认知策略的个体差异。然而,作为元认知的一个子类别,学习写作时元认知经验的变化迄今为止还没有得到充分的研究。为了弥补这一不足,我们采用了一种混合方法来研究英语作为外语(EFL)学习者的发展,纵向捕捉他们的元认知经验。具体而言,我们调查了 390 名 EFL 学习者在一个学期中写作元认知经验的变化及其写作发展情况。我们使用了一份调查问卷来测量这些学习者在两个写作任务中的元认知体验,包括元认知判断、元认知感受、在线任务特定元认知知识和在线任务特定元认知策略。我们挑选了 12 名参与者进行后续半结构式访谈。我们使用潜在特征分析(LPA)对定量数据进行了处理,以确定这些 EFL 学习者的元认知经验特征。使用 Mplus 8.3 进行的潜在特征分析(LPA)结果显示了两种元认知经验特征,即强化元认知经验和低强化元认知经验。利用 SPSS 24.0 的配对样本 t 检验进行的进一步定量分析表明,EFL 学习者的元认知经验在词汇复杂性、句法复杂性、流畅性和写作总分方面的变化与他们的写作发展相一致。通过使用 NVivo 12 进行主题分析,定性分析发现了影响 EFL 学习者元认知经验变化的两个因素,包括他们对写作的参与和语言能力的发展。显而易见,定量和定性研究结果表明,我们可以更细致、更准确地理解这些 EFL 学习者在学习写作过程中元认知经验的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
English as a foreign language learners' metacognitive experiences and writing development: Unraveling the process of learning EFL writing

Much research has investigated students' metacognitive growth focusing on their metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive strategies as individual differences in learning to write in a second/foreign language (L2). Yet to date, changes in metacognitive experiences when learning to write, a subcategory of metacognition, have been insufficiently scrutinized. To bridge this gap, we employed a mixed-methods approach to examine learners' development in English as a foreign language (EFL), capturing their metacognitive experiences longitudinally. Specifically, we investigated the changes in 390 EFL learners' metacognitive experiences in writing and their writing development over one semester. A questionnaire was used to measure these learners' metacognitive experiences over two writing tasks, capturing metacognitive judgments, metacognitive feelings, online task-specific metacognitive knowledge, and online task-specific metacognitive strategies. We selected 12 participants for follow-up semi-structured interviews. We processed the quantitative data using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to identify these EFL learners' metacognitive experience profiles. Findings of LPA using Mplus 8.3 revealed two metacognitive experiences profiles, characterized by intensive and less intensive metacognitive experiences. Further quantitative analysis using paired samples t-tests in SPSS 24.0 indicated that EFL learners' metacognitive experiences changed in alignment with their writing development in terms of lexical complexity, syntactic complexity, fluency, and overall writing scores. Qualitative findings from thematic analysis using NVivo 12 identified two factors affecting the changes in EFL learners' metacognitive experiences, including their involvement in writing and development in linguistic competence. As is evident, the quantitative and qualitative findings point to a more nuanced and precise understanding of the changes in these EFL learners' metacognitive experiences in learning to write.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
期刊最新文献
The structure of adult thinking: A network approach to (meta)cognitive processing Ink and pixels: Impact of highlighting and reading self-efficacy on adolescents' cognitive load, epistemic emotions, and text comprehension Students' study activities before and after exam deadlines as predictors of performance in STEM courses: A multi-source data analysis The relationship between positive and painful emotions and cognitive load during an algebra learning task Idiographic learning analytics: Mapping of the ethical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1