解决房间里的大象问题:我们如何理解交通运输公私合作伙伴关系中的资金效益?

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105401
{"title":"解决房间里的大象问题:我们如何理解交通运输公私合作伙伴关系中的资金效益?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Value for Money (V<em>f</em>M) is often considered the criterion for assessing whether Public Private Partnerships (PPPs), or the traditional procurement should be adopted to deliver infrastructure projects and their services. Yet, this decision is mostly focussed on whichever approach that embodies a lower cost while neglecting the value it can bring to projects. Addressing this elephant in the room, a set of interviews with highly experienced professionals (with an average of 23-year working experience in infrastructure procurement) were conducted to engender an in-depth understanding of V<em>f</em>M. Through the lens of sensemaking, our results empirically demonstrated the duality of V<em>f</em>M in the context of transport projects instead of the previous foci on cost, time, and quality (i.e., traditional V<em>f</em>M), and further unearthed the nuances when considering them. As such, this research contributes to the PPP body of knowledge by providing a more meaningful concept of V<em>f</em>M. For practitioners and decision makers, it proposes a framework to benchmark their V<em>f</em>M assessments of infrastructure interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124006152/pdfft?md5=6277d798954c4f90a1f94f17fb4fd146&pid=1-s2.0-S0264275124006152-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing the elephant in the room: How do we understand value for money in transport Public Private Partnerships?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Value for Money (V<em>f</em>M) is often considered the criterion for assessing whether Public Private Partnerships (PPPs), or the traditional procurement should be adopted to deliver infrastructure projects and their services. Yet, this decision is mostly focussed on whichever approach that embodies a lower cost while neglecting the value it can bring to projects. Addressing this elephant in the room, a set of interviews with highly experienced professionals (with an average of 23-year working experience in infrastructure procurement) were conducted to engender an in-depth understanding of V<em>f</em>M. Through the lens of sensemaking, our results empirically demonstrated the duality of V<em>f</em>M in the context of transport projects instead of the previous foci on cost, time, and quality (i.e., traditional V<em>f</em>M), and further unearthed the nuances when considering them. As such, this research contributes to the PPP body of knowledge by providing a more meaningful concept of V<em>f</em>M. For practitioners and decision makers, it proposes a framework to benchmark their V<em>f</em>M assessments of infrastructure interventions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124006152/pdfft?md5=6277d798954c4f90a1f94f17fb4fd146&pid=1-s2.0-S0264275124006152-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124006152\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124006152","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性价比(VfM)通常被认为是评估应采用公私合作伙伴关系(PPP)还是传统采购来交付基础设施项目及其服务的标准。然而,这一决定主要集中在哪种方式成本更低,而忽视了它能为项目带来的价值。针对这一问题,我们对经验丰富的专业人士(平均拥有 23 年的基础设施采购工作经验)进行了一系列访谈,以深入了解 VfM。通过 "感性认识 "的视角,我们的研究结果以实证的方式证明了在交通项目背景下的虚拟财务管理的双重性,而非以往的成本、时间和质量(即传统的虚拟财务管理),并进一步揭示了考虑这些因素时的细微差别。因此,本研究通过提供更有意义的 VfM 概念,为 PPP 知识体系做出了贡献。对于从业人员和决策者而言,本研究提出了一个框架,为他们对基础设施干预措施的虚拟财务管理评估提供基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Addressing the elephant in the room: How do we understand value for money in transport Public Private Partnerships?

Value for Money (VfM) is often considered the criterion for assessing whether Public Private Partnerships (PPPs), or the traditional procurement should be adopted to deliver infrastructure projects and their services. Yet, this decision is mostly focussed on whichever approach that embodies a lower cost while neglecting the value it can bring to projects. Addressing this elephant in the room, a set of interviews with highly experienced professionals (with an average of 23-year working experience in infrastructure procurement) were conducted to engender an in-depth understanding of VfM. Through the lens of sensemaking, our results empirically demonstrated the duality of VfM in the context of transport projects instead of the previous foci on cost, time, and quality (i.e., traditional VfM), and further unearthed the nuances when considering them. As such, this research contributes to the PPP body of knowledge by providing a more meaningful concept of VfM. For practitioners and decision makers, it proposes a framework to benchmark their VfM assessments of infrastructure interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
How do complete streets policies and legislative ordinances implement explicit wording regarding low-income populations and communities of color? A qualitative analysis Hot and bothered: Exploring the effect of heat on pedestrian route choice behavior and accessibility Does homeownership improve physical health? Evidence from a quasi-experiment in Hong Kong The recovery from the pandemic: A spatial-temporal analysis on the changes in mobility and public attitude in Singapore How to build vibrant communities by utilizing functional zones? A community-detection-based approach for revealing the association between land use and community vibrancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1