优化机会性合作合成以推动生态保护的框架

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Conservation Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110717
Ana M.M. Sequeira , Amanda E. Bates , Graeme Hays , David W. Sims , Samantha Andrzejaczek , Asta Audzijonyte , Julia K. Baum , Martin Beal , Barbara Block , Joshua Cinner , Kaitlyn Cowley , Eric Gilman , Arthur Gleason , Autumn-Lynn Harrison , Charlotte Hudson , Gakushi Ishimura , Rima W. Jabado , Jason P. Landrum , Sangeeta Mangubhai , Loren McClenachan , Sarah A. Marley
{"title":"优化机会性合作合成以推动生态保护的框架","authors":"Ana M.M. Sequeira ,&nbsp;Amanda E. Bates ,&nbsp;Graeme Hays ,&nbsp;David W. Sims ,&nbsp;Samantha Andrzejaczek ,&nbsp;Asta Audzijonyte ,&nbsp;Julia K. Baum ,&nbsp;Martin Beal ,&nbsp;Barbara Block ,&nbsp;Joshua Cinner ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Cowley ,&nbsp;Eric Gilman ,&nbsp;Arthur Gleason ,&nbsp;Autumn-Lynn Harrison ,&nbsp;Charlotte Hudson ,&nbsp;Gakushi Ishimura ,&nbsp;Rima W. Jabado ,&nbsp;Jason P. Landrum ,&nbsp;Sangeeta Mangubhai ,&nbsp;Loren McClenachan ,&nbsp;Sarah A. Marley","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ecological data are being opportunistically synthesised at unprecedented scales in response to the global biodiversity and climate crises. Such syntheses are often only possible through large-scale, international, multidisciplinary collaborations and provide important pathways for addressing urgent conservation questions. Although large collaborative data syntheses can lead to high-impact successes, they can also be plagued with difficulties. Challenges include the standardisation of data originally collected for different purposes, integration and interpretation of knowledge sourced across different disciplines and spatio-temporal scales, and management of differing perspectives from contributors with distinct academic and cultural backgrounds. Here, we use the collective expertise of a global team of conservation ecologists and practitioners to highlight common benefits and hurdles that arise with the development of opportunistic collaborative syntheses. We outline a framework of “best practice” for developing such collaborations, encompassing the design, implementation, and deliverable phases. Our framework addresses common challenges, highlighting key actions for successful collaboration and emphasizing the support requirements. We identify funding as a major constraint to sustaining the large, international, multidisciplinary teams required to advance collaborative syntheses in a just, equitable, diverse, and inclusive way. We further advocate for thinking strategically from the outset and highlight the need for reshaping funding agendas to prioritize the structures required to propel global scientific networks. Our framework will advance the science needed for ecological conservation and the sustainable use of global natural resources by supporting proto-groups initiating new syntheses, leaders and participants of ongoing projects, and funders who want to facilitate such collaborations in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"298 ","pages":"Article 110717"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724002799/pdfft?md5=306a8889280cf41d29230f2342602172&pid=1-s2.0-S0006320724002799-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework for optimising opportunistic collaborative syntheses to propel ecological conservation\",\"authors\":\"Ana M.M. Sequeira ,&nbsp;Amanda E. Bates ,&nbsp;Graeme Hays ,&nbsp;David W. Sims ,&nbsp;Samantha Andrzejaczek ,&nbsp;Asta Audzijonyte ,&nbsp;Julia K. Baum ,&nbsp;Martin Beal ,&nbsp;Barbara Block ,&nbsp;Joshua Cinner ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn Cowley ,&nbsp;Eric Gilman ,&nbsp;Arthur Gleason ,&nbsp;Autumn-Lynn Harrison ,&nbsp;Charlotte Hudson ,&nbsp;Gakushi Ishimura ,&nbsp;Rima W. Jabado ,&nbsp;Jason P. Landrum ,&nbsp;Sangeeta Mangubhai ,&nbsp;Loren McClenachan ,&nbsp;Sarah A. Marley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ecological data are being opportunistically synthesised at unprecedented scales in response to the global biodiversity and climate crises. Such syntheses are often only possible through large-scale, international, multidisciplinary collaborations and provide important pathways for addressing urgent conservation questions. Although large collaborative data syntheses can lead to high-impact successes, they can also be plagued with difficulties. Challenges include the standardisation of data originally collected for different purposes, integration and interpretation of knowledge sourced across different disciplines and spatio-temporal scales, and management of differing perspectives from contributors with distinct academic and cultural backgrounds. Here, we use the collective expertise of a global team of conservation ecologists and practitioners to highlight common benefits and hurdles that arise with the development of opportunistic collaborative syntheses. We outline a framework of “best practice” for developing such collaborations, encompassing the design, implementation, and deliverable phases. Our framework addresses common challenges, highlighting key actions for successful collaboration and emphasizing the support requirements. We identify funding as a major constraint to sustaining the large, international, multidisciplinary teams required to advance collaborative syntheses in a just, equitable, diverse, and inclusive way. We further advocate for thinking strategically from the outset and highlight the need for reshaping funding agendas to prioritize the structures required to propel global scientific networks. Our framework will advance the science needed for ecological conservation and the sustainable use of global natural resources by supporting proto-groups initiating new syntheses, leaders and participants of ongoing projects, and funders who want to facilitate such collaborations in the future.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"volume\":\"298 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724002799/pdfft?md5=306a8889280cf41d29230f2342602172&pid=1-s2.0-S0006320724002799-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724002799\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724002799","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为应对全球生物多样性和气候危机,生态数据正在以前所未有的规模得到及时综合。这种综合通常只有通过大规模的国际多学科合作才能实现,并为解决紧迫的保护问题提供了重要途径。虽然大型合作数据综合工作可以取得巨大成功,但也会遇到很多困难。面临的挑战包括:最初为不同目的收集的数据的标准化、不同学科和时空尺度知识的整合与解释,以及对具有不同学术和文化背景的贡献者的不同观点的管理。在这里,我们利用全球保护生态学家和实践者团队的集体专业知识,强调了在开发机会性合作综述过程中出现的共同优势和障碍。我们概述了开展此类合作的 "最佳实践 "框架,包括设计、实施和交付阶段。我们的框架解决了常见的挑战,突出了成功合作的关键行动,并强调了支持要求。我们认为,资金是一个主要制约因素,无法维持以公正、公平、多样和包容的方式推进合作综述所需的大型国际多学科团队。我们进一步主张从一开始就进行战略思考,并强调需要重塑资助议程,优先考虑推动全球科学网络所需的结构。我们的框架将通过支持发起新综合研究的原小组、正在进行的项目的领导者和参与者以及希望在未来促进此类合作的资助者,推动生态保护和全球自然资源可持续利用所需的科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A framework for optimising opportunistic collaborative syntheses to propel ecological conservation

Ecological data are being opportunistically synthesised at unprecedented scales in response to the global biodiversity and climate crises. Such syntheses are often only possible through large-scale, international, multidisciplinary collaborations and provide important pathways for addressing urgent conservation questions. Although large collaborative data syntheses can lead to high-impact successes, they can also be plagued with difficulties. Challenges include the standardisation of data originally collected for different purposes, integration and interpretation of knowledge sourced across different disciplines and spatio-temporal scales, and management of differing perspectives from contributors with distinct academic and cultural backgrounds. Here, we use the collective expertise of a global team of conservation ecologists and practitioners to highlight common benefits and hurdles that arise with the development of opportunistic collaborative syntheses. We outline a framework of “best practice” for developing such collaborations, encompassing the design, implementation, and deliverable phases. Our framework addresses common challenges, highlighting key actions for successful collaboration and emphasizing the support requirements. We identify funding as a major constraint to sustaining the large, international, multidisciplinary teams required to advance collaborative syntheses in a just, equitable, diverse, and inclusive way. We further advocate for thinking strategically from the outset and highlight the need for reshaping funding agendas to prioritize the structures required to propel global scientific networks. Our framework will advance the science needed for ecological conservation and the sustainable use of global natural resources by supporting proto-groups initiating new syntheses, leaders and participants of ongoing projects, and funders who want to facilitate such collaborations in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
What Science in the tropics should not be about Present distribution of common hippopotamus populations in southern Africa, and the need for a centralised database Managing multiple threats: Evaluating the efficacy of broad-scale introduced predator management in improving native mammal resilience to fire Optimizing demographic analysis in the face of missing data years to improve conservation of threatened species Spatial distribution of tree-related microhabitats in European beech-dominated forests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1