openEHR 临床数据存储库调查

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105591
Giovanni Delussu, Francesca Frexia, Cecilia Mascia, Alessandro Sulis, Vittorio Meloni, Mauro Del Rio, Luca Lianas
{"title":"openEHR 临床数据存储库调查","authors":"Giovanni Delussu,&nbsp;Francesca Frexia,&nbsp;Cecilia Mascia,&nbsp;Alessandro Sulis,&nbsp;Vittorio Meloni,&nbsp;Mauro Del Rio,&nbsp;Luca Lianas","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Background: Clinical Data Repositories (CDRs) lie at the core of both primary and secondary utilisation of vast amounts of health information. These data are intricate, heterogeneous and constantly evolving alongside advancements in biomedical sciences. The separation between clinical content and its persistence renders the archetype-based paradigm naturally well-suited to manage this complexity. This approach is adopted by a number of open source and commercial CDR solutions, mostly implementing the openEHR specifications, which also encompass the Archetype Query Language (AQL) to define portable queries independently of the persistence scheme.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Aim: To provide a wide knowledge base and a set of customisable tools as a support in the selection of openEHR CDRs according to a broad ensemble of features relevant to different use cases.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Approach: After conducting an extensive search of the existing openEHR CDRs, a survey consisting of fifty-four questions was administered to all the nineteen identified vendors/developers, covering an ample set of aspects such as licensing, implementation, interoperability and ecosystem. Subsequently, the answers from the eleven responders were processed and analysed, also applying statistical techniques.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Results: Two detailed tables depict the current landscape of openEHR CDRs, presenting a structured view of the most relevant survey answers. Unsupervised clustering led to the categorisation of CDRs into four groups, and a decision-making diagram has been designed to aid the CDR selection according to a restricted set of desired features.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Conclusions: Compared to a similar study conducted in 2013, the results indicate a worldwide rise in the number of openEHR CDRs, marked by a wider adoption of the dedicated query language, to leverage AQL universality across openEHR platforms. The evolution in the last ten years also included an increased attention to exchange data with non-openEHR solutions and to simplify the content creation from clinical models based on Archetypes and Templates. Materials and analytical tools hereby presented are publicly available for further reuse.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of openEHR Clinical Data Repositories\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Delussu,&nbsp;Francesca Frexia,&nbsp;Cecilia Mascia,&nbsp;Alessandro Sulis,&nbsp;Vittorio Meloni,&nbsp;Mauro Del Rio,&nbsp;Luca Lianas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>Background: Clinical Data Repositories (CDRs) lie at the core of both primary and secondary utilisation of vast amounts of health information. These data are intricate, heterogeneous and constantly evolving alongside advancements in biomedical sciences. The separation between clinical content and its persistence renders the archetype-based paradigm naturally well-suited to manage this complexity. This approach is adopted by a number of open source and commercial CDR solutions, mostly implementing the openEHR specifications, which also encompass the Archetype Query Language (AQL) to define portable queries independently of the persistence scheme.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Aim: To provide a wide knowledge base and a set of customisable tools as a support in the selection of openEHR CDRs according to a broad ensemble of features relevant to different use cases.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Approach: After conducting an extensive search of the existing openEHR CDRs, a survey consisting of fifty-four questions was administered to all the nineteen identified vendors/developers, covering an ample set of aspects such as licensing, implementation, interoperability and ecosystem. Subsequently, the answers from the eleven responders were processed and analysed, also applying statistical techniques.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Results: Two detailed tables depict the current landscape of openEHR CDRs, presenting a structured view of the most relevant survey answers. Unsupervised clustering led to the categorisation of CDRs into four groups, and a decision-making diagram has been designed to aid the CDR selection according to a restricted set of desired features.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Conclusions: Compared to a similar study conducted in 2013, the results indicate a worldwide rise in the number of openEHR CDRs, marked by a wider adoption of the dedicated query language, to leverage AQL universality across openEHR platforms. The evolution in the last ten years also included an increased attention to exchange data with non-openEHR solutions and to simplify the content creation from clinical models based on Archetypes and Templates. Materials and analytical tools hereby presented are publicly available for further reuse.</p></span></li></ul></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624002545\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624002545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

-背景:临床数据存储库(CDR)是对大量健康信息进行初级和二级利用的核心。这些数据错综复杂、互不相同,而且随着生物医学科学的发展而不断演变。临床内容与其持久性之间的分离使得基于原型的范例非常适合管理这种复杂性。许多开源和商业 CDR 解决方案都采用了这种方法,它们大多实施了 openEHR 规范,其中还包括原型查询语言(AQL),用于定义独立于持久性方案的可移植查询:方法:在对现有的开放式电子病历 CDR 进行广泛搜索后,对所有 19 家已确定的供应商/开发商进 行了一项包含 54 个问题的调查,涉及许可、实施、互操作性和生态系统等多个方面。随后,对 11 个答复者的答案进行了处理和分析,并应用了统计技术:结果:两张详细的表格描述了开放式电子病历 CDR 的现状,并对最相关的调查答案进行了结构化分析。通过无监督聚类,将 CDR 分成了四组,并设计了一个决策图,以帮助根据一组受限的所需特征选择 CDR:与 2013 年进行的一项类似研究相比,研究结果表明开放式电子病历 CDR 的数量在全球范围内呈上升趋势,其特点是更广泛地采用了专用查询语言,以利用 AQL 在开放式电子病历平台上的通用性。过去十年的发展还包括对与非 openEHR 解决方案交换数据以及简化基于原型和模板的临床模型的内容创建的日益关注。本文所介绍的材料和分析工具均可公开获取,以供进一步重复使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A survey of openEHR Clinical Data Repositories

  • Background: Clinical Data Repositories (CDRs) lie at the core of both primary and secondary utilisation of vast amounts of health information. These data are intricate, heterogeneous and constantly evolving alongside advancements in biomedical sciences. The separation between clinical content and its persistence renders the archetype-based paradigm naturally well-suited to manage this complexity. This approach is adopted by a number of open source and commercial CDR solutions, mostly implementing the openEHR specifications, which also encompass the Archetype Query Language (AQL) to define portable queries independently of the persistence scheme.

  • Aim: To provide a wide knowledge base and a set of customisable tools as a support in the selection of openEHR CDRs according to a broad ensemble of features relevant to different use cases.

  • Approach: After conducting an extensive search of the existing openEHR CDRs, a survey consisting of fifty-four questions was administered to all the nineteen identified vendors/developers, covering an ample set of aspects such as licensing, implementation, interoperability and ecosystem. Subsequently, the answers from the eleven responders were processed and analysed, also applying statistical techniques.

  • Results: Two detailed tables depict the current landscape of openEHR CDRs, presenting a structured view of the most relevant survey answers. Unsupervised clustering led to the categorisation of CDRs into four groups, and a decision-making diagram has been designed to aid the CDR selection according to a restricted set of desired features.

  • Conclusions: Compared to a similar study conducted in 2013, the results indicate a worldwide rise in the number of openEHR CDRs, marked by a wider adoption of the dedicated query language, to leverage AQL universality across openEHR platforms. The evolution in the last ten years also included an increased attention to exchange data with non-openEHR solutions and to simplify the content creation from clinical models based on Archetypes and Templates. Materials and analytical tools hereby presented are publicly available for further reuse.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Application of the openEHR reference model for PGHD: A case study on the DH-Convener initiative Tracking provenance in clinical data warehouses for quality management Acute myocardial infarction risk prediction in emergency chest pain patients: An external validation study Healthcare professionals’ cross-organizational access to electronic health records: A scoping review Cross-modal similar clinical case retrieval using a modular model based on contrastive learning and k-nearest neighbor search
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1