与偏头痛误诊相关的医疗资源使用和成本。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Headache Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1111/head.14822
Jae Rok Kim, Tae Jin Park, Maria Agapova, Andrew Blumenfeld, Jonathan H Smith, Darshini Shah, Beth Devine
{"title":"与偏头痛误诊相关的医疗资源使用和成本。","authors":"Jae Rok Kim, Tae Jin Park, Maria Agapova, Andrew Blumenfeld, Jonathan H Smith, Darshini Shah, Beth Devine","doi":"10.1111/head.14822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs in patients with migraine with or without a history of misdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the high prevalence of migraine, migraine is commonly misdiagnosed. The healthcare resource use and cost burden of a misdiagnosis is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study identified adults with an incident migraine diagnosis from the Merative™ Marketscan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases between June 2018 and 2019. Patients with a diagnosis of commonly considered misdiagnoses (headache, sinusitis, or cervical pain) before their migraine diagnosis were classified as the \"misdiagnosed cohort.\" Patients in the misdiagnosed cohort were potentially misdiagnosed, then eventually received a correct diagnosis. Patients without a history of commonly considered misdiagnoses prior to their migraine diagnosis were classified as the \"correctly diagnosed cohort.\" Healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs were assessed in the period before migraine diagnosis and compared between the cohorts. Outcomes were reported as per patient per month and compared with incidence rate ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29,147 patients comprised the correctly diagnosed cohort and 3841 patients comprised the misdiagnosed cohort and met the inclusion criteria. Patients in the misdiagnosed cohort had statistically significantly higher rates of inpatient admissions (0.02 vs. 0.01, incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-1.74), emergency department visits (0.10 vs. 0.05; IRR 1.89, 95% CI 1.79-1.99), neurologist visits (0.12 vs. 0.02; IRR 5.95, 95% CI 5.40-6.57), non-neurologist outpatient visits (2.64 vs. 1.58; IRR 1.67, 95% CI 1.62-1.72) and prescription fills (2.82 vs. 1.84; IRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.48-1.58) compared to correctly diagnosed patients. Misdiagnosed patients had statistically significantly higher rates of healthcare cost accrual for inpatient admissions ($1362 vs. $518; IRR 2.62, 95% CI 2.50-2.75), emergency department visits ($222 vs. $98; IRR 2.27, 95% CI 2.18-2.36), neurologist visits ($42 vs. $9; IRR 4.39, 95% CI 4.00-4.79), non-neurologist outpatient visits ($1327 vs. $641; IRR 2.07, 95% CI 1.91-2.24), and prescription fills ($305 vs. $215; IRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.18-1.70) compared to correctly diagnosed patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with migraine who have a history of misdiagnoses have higher rates of healthcare resource utilization and cost accrual versus those without such history.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare resource use and costs associated with the misdiagnosis of migraine.\",\"authors\":\"Jae Rok Kim, Tae Jin Park, Maria Agapova, Andrew Blumenfeld, Jonathan H Smith, Darshini Shah, Beth Devine\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/head.14822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs in patients with migraine with or without a history of misdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the high prevalence of migraine, migraine is commonly misdiagnosed. The healthcare resource use and cost burden of a misdiagnosis is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study identified adults with an incident migraine diagnosis from the Merative™ Marketscan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases between June 2018 and 2019. Patients with a diagnosis of commonly considered misdiagnoses (headache, sinusitis, or cervical pain) before their migraine diagnosis were classified as the \\\"misdiagnosed cohort.\\\" Patients in the misdiagnosed cohort were potentially misdiagnosed, then eventually received a correct diagnosis. Patients without a history of commonly considered misdiagnoses prior to their migraine diagnosis were classified as the \\\"correctly diagnosed cohort.\\\" Healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs were assessed in the period before migraine diagnosis and compared between the cohorts. Outcomes were reported as per patient per month and compared with incidence rate ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29,147 patients comprised the correctly diagnosed cohort and 3841 patients comprised the misdiagnosed cohort and met the inclusion criteria. Patients in the misdiagnosed cohort had statistically significantly higher rates of inpatient admissions (0.02 vs. 0.01, incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-1.74), emergency department visits (0.10 vs. 0.05; IRR 1.89, 95% CI 1.79-1.99), neurologist visits (0.12 vs. 0.02; IRR 5.95, 95% CI 5.40-6.57), non-neurologist outpatient visits (2.64 vs. 1.58; IRR 1.67, 95% CI 1.62-1.72) and prescription fills (2.82 vs. 1.84; IRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.48-1.58) compared to correctly diagnosed patients. Misdiagnosed patients had statistically significantly higher rates of healthcare cost accrual for inpatient admissions ($1362 vs. $518; IRR 2.62, 95% CI 2.50-2.75), emergency department visits ($222 vs. $98; IRR 2.27, 95% CI 2.18-2.36), neurologist visits ($42 vs. $9; IRR 4.39, 95% CI 4.00-4.79), non-neurologist outpatient visits ($1327 vs. $641; IRR 2.07, 95% CI 1.91-2.24), and prescription fills ($305 vs. $215; IRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.18-1.70) compared to correctly diagnosed patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with migraine who have a history of misdiagnoses have higher rates of healthcare resource utilization and cost accrual versus those without such history.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Headache\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14822\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14822","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较有或无误诊史的偏头痛患者的医疗资源利用率和医疗费用:比较有或无误诊史的偏头痛患者的医疗资源利用率和医疗成本:背景:尽管偏头痛的发病率很高,但偏头痛经常被误诊。背景:尽管偏头痛的发病率很高,但偏头痛经常被误诊,误诊造成的医疗资源使用和成本负担尚不清楚:这项回顾性队列研究从 Merative™ Marketscan® 商业数据库和医疗保险补充数据库中找出了 2018 年 6 月至 2019 年期间被诊断为偏头痛的成年人。在确诊偏头痛之前曾被诊断为常见误诊(头痛、鼻窦炎或颈椎疼痛)的患者被归入 "误诊队列"。误诊队列中的患者有可能被误诊,但最终得到了正确的诊断。在确诊偏头痛之前没有通常认为的误诊史的患者被归入 "正确诊断队列"。我们对偏头痛确诊前的医疗资源利用率和医疗成本进行了评估,并对两组患者进行了比较。结果以每名患者每月为单位进行报告,并与发病率比率进行比较:符合纳入标准的正确诊断队列共有 29147 名患者,误诊队列共有 3841 名患者。误诊患者的住院率(0.02 vs. 0.01,发病率比 [IRR] 1.61,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.47-1.74)、急诊就诊率(0.10 vs. 0.05;IRR 1.89,95% CI 1.与诊断正确的患者相比,误诊患者在急诊就诊次数(0.10 vs. 0.05;IRR 1.89,95% CI 1.79-1.99)、神经科就诊次数(0.12 vs. 0.02;IRR 5.95,95% CI 5.40-6.57)、非神经科门诊就诊次数(2.64 vs. 1.58;IRR 1.67,95% CI 1.62-1.72)和处方开具次数(2.82 vs. 1.84;IRR 1.53,95% CI 1.48-1.58)方面均高于诊断错误的患者。误诊患者在住院(1362 美元对 518 美元;IRR 为 2.62,95% CI 为 2.50-2.75)、急诊就诊(222 美元对 98 美元;IRR 为 2.27,95% CI 为 2.18-2.36)、神经科医生就诊(222 美元对 98 美元;IRR 为 2.27,95% CI 为 2.18-2.36)等方面的医疗费用累积率明显更高。结论:与诊断正确的患者相比,有偏头痛病史的偏头痛患者在治疗过程中可能会面临更多的风险:结论:与无误诊史的偏头痛患者相比,有误诊史的偏头痛患者的医疗资源使用率和成本增加率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Healthcare resource use and costs associated with the misdiagnosis of migraine.

Objective: To compare healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs in patients with migraine with or without a history of misdiagnosis.

Background: Despite the high prevalence of migraine, migraine is commonly misdiagnosed. The healthcare resource use and cost burden of a misdiagnosis is unknown.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study identified adults with an incident migraine diagnosis from the Merative™ Marketscan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases between June 2018 and 2019. Patients with a diagnosis of commonly considered misdiagnoses (headache, sinusitis, or cervical pain) before their migraine diagnosis were classified as the "misdiagnosed cohort." Patients in the misdiagnosed cohort were potentially misdiagnosed, then eventually received a correct diagnosis. Patients without a history of commonly considered misdiagnoses prior to their migraine diagnosis were classified as the "correctly diagnosed cohort." Healthcare resource utilization and healthcare costs were assessed in the period before migraine diagnosis and compared between the cohorts. Outcomes were reported as per patient per month and compared with incidence rate ratios.

Results: A total of 29,147 patients comprised the correctly diagnosed cohort and 3841 patients comprised the misdiagnosed cohort and met the inclusion criteria. Patients in the misdiagnosed cohort had statistically significantly higher rates of inpatient admissions (0.02 vs. 0.01, incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-1.74), emergency department visits (0.10 vs. 0.05; IRR 1.89, 95% CI 1.79-1.99), neurologist visits (0.12 vs. 0.02; IRR 5.95, 95% CI 5.40-6.57), non-neurologist outpatient visits (2.64 vs. 1.58; IRR 1.67, 95% CI 1.62-1.72) and prescription fills (2.82 vs. 1.84; IRR 1.53, 95% CI 1.48-1.58) compared to correctly diagnosed patients. Misdiagnosed patients had statistically significantly higher rates of healthcare cost accrual for inpatient admissions ($1362 vs. $518; IRR 2.62, 95% CI 2.50-2.75), emergency department visits ($222 vs. $98; IRR 2.27, 95% CI 2.18-2.36), neurologist visits ($42 vs. $9; IRR 4.39, 95% CI 4.00-4.79), non-neurologist outpatient visits ($1327 vs. $641; IRR 2.07, 95% CI 1.91-2.24), and prescription fills ($305 vs. $215; IRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.18-1.70) compared to correctly diagnosed patients.

Conclusion: Patients with migraine who have a history of misdiagnoses have higher rates of healthcare resource utilization and cost accrual versus those without such history.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
期刊最新文献
Headaches in Sjogren's disease: A narrative review. Occipital neuralgia as an initial manifestation of atypical Lemierre syndrome: A case report. Safety and tolerability of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in participants taking atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: Results from the TANDEM study. Anxiety, depression, and headache-related disability in a large pediatric clinic-based sample. Associations of comorbid headache disorders and depression with leisure-time physical activity among 14,088 adults in The Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1