原发性和继发性靶向肌肉神经再支配术后早期疼痛过程--疼痛结果的时间描述。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1055/a-2404-7732
Floris Raasveld, Yannick Albert J Hoftiezer, Barbara Gomez-Eslava, Justin McCarty, Ian L Valerio, Marilyn Heng, Kyle R Eberlin
{"title":"原发性和继发性靶向肌肉神经再支配术后早期疼痛过程--疼痛结果的时间描述。","authors":"Floris Raasveld, Yannick Albert J Hoftiezer, Barbara Gomez-Eslava, Justin McCarty, Ian L Valerio, Marilyn Heng, Kyle R Eberlin","doi":"10.1055/a-2404-7732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an effective surgical treatment of neuropathic pain for amputees. However, limited data exists regarding the early post-operative pain course for patients who undergo either Primary (<14 days since amputation) or Secondary (≥14 days) TMR. This study aims to outline the post-operative pain course for Primary and Secondary TMR during the first six post-operative months, to aid in patient education and expectation management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were eligible if they underwent TMR surgery between 2017 and 2023. Prospectively collected patient-reported outcome measures of pain scores, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity were analyzed. Multilevel mixed-effect models were utilized to visualize and compare pain courses between Primary and Secondary TMR patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 203 amputees were included, with 40.9% being Primary and 59.1% being Secondary TMR patients. Primary TMR patients reported significantly lower pain scores over the full 6-month post-operative trajectory (p<0.001) compared to Secondary TMR patients, with a difference of Δ-1.0 at day of TMR (Primary=4.5, Secondary=5.5), and a difference of Δ-1.4 at the 6-month mark (Primary=3.6, Secondary=5.0). Primary TMR patients also reported significantly lower Pain Interference (p<0.001) and Pain Intensity scores (p<0.001) over the complete trajectory of their care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary TMR patients report lower pain during the first six months post-operatively compared to secondary TMR patients. This may reflect how pre-existing neuropathic pain is more challenging to mitigate through peripheral nerve surgery. The current trends may assist in both understanding the post-operative pain course and in managing patient expectations following TMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Post-operative Pain Course Following Primary and Secondary Targeted Muscle Reinnervation - a Temporal Description of Pain Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Floris Raasveld, Yannick Albert J Hoftiezer, Barbara Gomez-Eslava, Justin McCarty, Ian L Valerio, Marilyn Heng, Kyle R Eberlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2404-7732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an effective surgical treatment of neuropathic pain for amputees. However, limited data exists regarding the early post-operative pain course for patients who undergo either Primary (<14 days since amputation) or Secondary (≥14 days) TMR. This study aims to outline the post-operative pain course for Primary and Secondary TMR during the first six post-operative months, to aid in patient education and expectation management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were eligible if they underwent TMR surgery between 2017 and 2023. Prospectively collected patient-reported outcome measures of pain scores, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity were analyzed. Multilevel mixed-effect models were utilized to visualize and compare pain courses between Primary and Secondary TMR patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 203 amputees were included, with 40.9% being Primary and 59.1% being Secondary TMR patients. Primary TMR patients reported significantly lower pain scores over the full 6-month post-operative trajectory (p<0.001) compared to Secondary TMR patients, with a difference of Δ-1.0 at day of TMR (Primary=4.5, Secondary=5.5), and a difference of Δ-1.4 at the 6-month mark (Primary=3.6, Secondary=5.0). Primary TMR patients also reported significantly lower Pain Interference (p<0.001) and Pain Intensity scores (p<0.001) over the complete trajectory of their care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary TMR patients report lower pain during the first six months post-operatively compared to secondary TMR patients. This may reflect how pre-existing neuropathic pain is more challenging to mitigate through peripheral nerve surgery. The current trends may assist in both understanding the post-operative pain course and in managing patient expectations following TMR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2404-7732\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2404-7732","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:靶向肌肉神经支配(TMR)是治疗截肢者神经性疼痛的有效手术方法。然而,关于接受这两种手术的患者术后早期疼痛过程的数据十分有限:在2017年至2023年期间接受TMR手术的患者均符合条件。分析了前瞻性收集的患者报告结果,包括疼痛评分、疼痛干扰和疼痛强度。利用多层次混合效应模型对初级和中级TMR患者的疼痛过程进行可视化比较:共纳入了 203 名截肢者,其中 40.9% 为原发性颞下颌关节置换术患者,59.1% 为继发性颞下颌关节置换术患者。原发性颞下颌关节置换术患者在术后 6 个月内的疼痛评分明显较低(p 结论:原发性颞下颌关节置换术患者在术后 6 个月内的疼痛评分明显较低:与继发性颞下颌关节置换术患者相比,原发性颞下颌关节置换术患者在术后前六个月的疼痛报告较低。这可能反映了通过外周神经手术减轻原有神经病理性疼痛更具挑战性。目前的趋势可能有助于了解术后疼痛的过程,也有助于管理患者对颞下颌关节置换术后的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early Post-operative Pain Course Following Primary and Secondary Targeted Muscle Reinnervation - a Temporal Description of Pain Outcomes.

Introduction: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an effective surgical treatment of neuropathic pain for amputees. However, limited data exists regarding the early post-operative pain course for patients who undergo either Primary (<14 days since amputation) or Secondary (≥14 days) TMR. This study aims to outline the post-operative pain course for Primary and Secondary TMR during the first six post-operative months, to aid in patient education and expectation management.

Methods: Patients were eligible if they underwent TMR surgery between 2017 and 2023. Prospectively collected patient-reported outcome measures of pain scores, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity were analyzed. Multilevel mixed-effect models were utilized to visualize and compare pain courses between Primary and Secondary TMR patients.

Results: A total of 203 amputees were included, with 40.9% being Primary and 59.1% being Secondary TMR patients. Primary TMR patients reported significantly lower pain scores over the full 6-month post-operative trajectory (p<0.001) compared to Secondary TMR patients, with a difference of Δ-1.0 at day of TMR (Primary=4.5, Secondary=5.5), and a difference of Δ-1.4 at the 6-month mark (Primary=3.6, Secondary=5.0). Primary TMR patients also reported significantly lower Pain Interference (p<0.001) and Pain Intensity scores (p<0.001) over the complete trajectory of their care.

Conclusion: Primary TMR patients report lower pain during the first six months post-operatively compared to secondary TMR patients. This may reflect how pre-existing neuropathic pain is more challenging to mitigate through peripheral nerve surgery. The current trends may assist in both understanding the post-operative pain course and in managing patient expectations following TMR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Flap-Based Reconstruction in Patients with Autoimmune Disease: An Institutional Experience with the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Review of the Literature. Free Latissimus Dorsi Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction at a Modern High-Volume Microsurgery Center. Trends in Hospital Billing for Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Procedures from 2013 to 2020. Deep Circumflex Iliac Artery-vascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Computed Tomography Anatomical Study. DIEP Donor Site Satisfaction between Patients with and without History of Pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1