腹膜透析患者的肝平面灌注对腹内压的敏感性。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Peritoneal Dialysis International Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1177/08968608241275922
Werner Ribitsch, Thomas A Lehner, Notburga Sauseng, Alexander R Rosenkranz, Daniel Schneditz
{"title":"腹膜透析患者的肝平面灌注对腹内压的敏感性。","authors":"Werner Ribitsch, Thomas A Lehner, Notburga Sauseng, Alexander R Rosenkranz, Daniel Schneditz","doi":"10.1177/08968608241275922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of peritoneal filling on hepato-splanchnic perfusion during peritoneal dialysis has not been fully elucidated yet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurements were done in 20 prevalent peritoneal dialysis patients during a peritoneal equilibration test (PET) with 2L of standard dialysate. Data were obtained in the drained state at baseline (<i>T</i><sub>0</sub>), after instillation (<i>T</i><sub>1</sub>), and after 2 h of dwell time (<i>T</i><sub>2</sub>). Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measured by Durand's approach. The hepatic clearance index (KI) of indocyanine-green (ICG) was determined as an indirect measure of hepato-splanchnic blood flow. Cardiac index (CI), heart rate (HR), and total peripheral resistance index (TPRI) were derived from continuous arterial pulse analysis. Fluid volume overload (VO) was evaluated by multifrequency bioimpedance analysis. Ejection fraction (EF) was obtained from echocardiographic examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IAP was 5.8 ± 3.5 mmHg at baseline (<i>T</i><sub>0</sub>), rose to 9.4 ± 2.8 mmHg after instillation of dialysate (<i>T</i><sub>1</sub>), and further to 9.7 ± 2.8 mmHg after 2 h of dwell time (<i>p </i>< 0.001). KI slightly declined from 0.60 ± 0.22 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> at <i>T</i><sub>0</sub> to 0.53 ± 0.15 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> at <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> (<i>p </i>= 0.075), and returned to 0.59 ± 0.22 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> at <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> (<i>p </i>= 0.052). CI, HR, and TPRI did not change significantly. In five patients with an EF < 40% KI was significantly lower at <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> (0.42 ± 0.12 L/min/m<sup>2</sup>; <i>p </i>= 0.039), and further decreased at <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> (0.40 ± 0.04 L/min/m<sup>2</sup>; <i>p </i>= 0.016) compared to patients with normal EF (<i>T</i><sub>1</sub>: 0.58 ± 0.15 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> and <i>T</i><sub>2</sub>: 0.67 ± 0.22 L/min/m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, hepatic clearance of ICG as a marker of hepato-splanchnic blood flow is not affected by the filling of the peritoneal cavity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19969,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","volume":" ","pages":"8968608241275922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Susceptibility of hepato-splanchnic perfusion to intra-abdominal pressure in peritoneal dialysis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Werner Ribitsch, Thomas A Lehner, Notburga Sauseng, Alexander R Rosenkranz, Daniel Schneditz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08968608241275922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of peritoneal filling on hepato-splanchnic perfusion during peritoneal dialysis has not been fully elucidated yet.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurements were done in 20 prevalent peritoneal dialysis patients during a peritoneal equilibration test (PET) with 2L of standard dialysate. Data were obtained in the drained state at baseline (<i>T</i><sub>0</sub>), after instillation (<i>T</i><sub>1</sub>), and after 2 h of dwell time (<i>T</i><sub>2</sub>). Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measured by Durand's approach. The hepatic clearance index (KI) of indocyanine-green (ICG) was determined as an indirect measure of hepato-splanchnic blood flow. Cardiac index (CI), heart rate (HR), and total peripheral resistance index (TPRI) were derived from continuous arterial pulse analysis. Fluid volume overload (VO) was evaluated by multifrequency bioimpedance analysis. Ejection fraction (EF) was obtained from echocardiographic examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IAP was 5.8 ± 3.5 mmHg at baseline (<i>T</i><sub>0</sub>), rose to 9.4 ± 2.8 mmHg after instillation of dialysate (<i>T</i><sub>1</sub>), and further to 9.7 ± 2.8 mmHg after 2 h of dwell time (<i>p </i>< 0.001). KI slightly declined from 0.60 ± 0.22 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> at <i>T</i><sub>0</sub> to 0.53 ± 0.15 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> at <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> (<i>p </i>= 0.075), and returned to 0.59 ± 0.22 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> at <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> (<i>p </i>= 0.052). CI, HR, and TPRI did not change significantly. In five patients with an EF < 40% KI was significantly lower at <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> (0.42 ± 0.12 L/min/m<sup>2</sup>; <i>p </i>= 0.039), and further decreased at <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> (0.40 ± 0.04 L/min/m<sup>2</sup>; <i>p </i>= 0.016) compared to patients with normal EF (<i>T</i><sub>1</sub>: 0.58 ± 0.15 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> and <i>T</i><sub>2</sub>: 0.67 ± 0.22 L/min/m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, hepatic clearance of ICG as a marker of hepato-splanchnic blood flow is not affected by the filling of the peritoneal cavity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8968608241275922\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608241275922\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608241275922","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹膜透析过程中腹膜充盈对肝脏灌注的影响尚未完全阐明:方法:在使用 2 升标准透析液进行腹膜平衡测试 (PET) 期间,对 20 名流行腹膜透析患者进行了测量。数据分别在基线(T0)、灌注后(T1)和停留 2 小时后(T2)的排水状态下获得。腹内压(IAP)采用杜兰法测量。吲哚菁绿(ICG)的肝清除指数(KI)被确定为肝脏血流的间接测量指标。心脏指数(CI)、心率(HR)和总外周阻力指数(TPRI)由连续动脉脉搏分析得出。液体容量超载(VO)通过多频生物阻抗分析进行评估。射血分数(EF)由超声心动图检查得出:基线(T0)时的 IAP 为 5.8 ± 3.5 mmHg,注入透析液后(T1)升至 9.4 ± 2.8 mmHg,停留 2 小时后进一步升至 9.7 ± 2.8 mmHg(P 2),T0 时为 0.53 ± 0.15 L/min/m2,T1 时为 0.53 ± 0.15 L/min/m2(P = 0.075),T2 时恢复至 0.59 ± 0.22 L/min/m2(P = 0.052)。CI、HR 和 TPRI 没有明显变化。与 EF 正常的患者(T1:0.58 ± 0.15 L/min/m2 和 T2:0.67 ± 0.22 L/min/m2)相比,5 名 EF T1 患者的 CI(0.42 ± 0.12 L/min/m2;p = 0.039)在 T2 时进一步下降(0.40 ± 0.04 L/min/m2;p = 0.016):总体而言,作为肝-脾血流标志物的 ICG 的肝清除率不受腹腔充盈的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Susceptibility of hepato-splanchnic perfusion to intra-abdominal pressure in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Background: The impact of peritoneal filling on hepato-splanchnic perfusion during peritoneal dialysis has not been fully elucidated yet.

Methods: Measurements were done in 20 prevalent peritoneal dialysis patients during a peritoneal equilibration test (PET) with 2L of standard dialysate. Data were obtained in the drained state at baseline (T0), after instillation (T1), and after 2 h of dwell time (T2). Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measured by Durand's approach. The hepatic clearance index (KI) of indocyanine-green (ICG) was determined as an indirect measure of hepato-splanchnic blood flow. Cardiac index (CI), heart rate (HR), and total peripheral resistance index (TPRI) were derived from continuous arterial pulse analysis. Fluid volume overload (VO) was evaluated by multifrequency bioimpedance analysis. Ejection fraction (EF) was obtained from echocardiographic examination.

Results: IAP was 5.8 ± 3.5 mmHg at baseline (T0), rose to 9.4 ± 2.8 mmHg after instillation of dialysate (T1), and further to 9.7 ± 2.8 mmHg after 2 h of dwell time (p < 0.001). KI slightly declined from 0.60 ± 0.22 L/min/m2 at T0 to 0.53 ± 0.15 L/min/m2 at T1 (p = 0.075), and returned to 0.59 ± 0.22 L/min/m2 at T2 (p = 0.052). CI, HR, and TPRI did not change significantly. In five patients with an EF < 40% KI was significantly lower at T1 (0.42 ± 0.12 L/min/m2; p = 0.039), and further decreased at T2 (0.40 ± 0.04 L/min/m2; p = 0.016) compared to patients with normal EF (T1: 0.58 ± 0.15 L/min/m2 and T2: 0.67 ± 0.22 L/min/m2).

Conclusions: Overall, hepatic clearance of ICG as a marker of hepato-splanchnic blood flow is not affected by the filling of the peritoneal cavity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Peritoneal Dialysis International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peritoneal Dialysis International (PDI) is an international publication dedicated to peritoneal dialysis. PDI welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of peritoneal dialysis from scientists working in the peritoneal dialysis field around the world. Peritoneal Dialysis International is included in Index Medicus and indexed in Current Contents/Clinical Practice, the Science Citation Index, and Excerpta Medica (Nephrology/Urology Core Journal). It is also abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts (CA), as well as being indexed in Embase as a priority journal.
期刊最新文献
Peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplantation: Your questions answered. Peritoneal dialysis in patients with severe obesity: A successful single center experience. Emergency shortages of PD solutions in the United States: How can we be better prepared in the future? Comparing residual kidney function equations based on β2-microglobulin in Chinese patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneopleuropericardial leakage confirmed with peritoneal scintigraphy in a teenage girl.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1