{"title":"肾移植受者肠道微生物群的改变与尿路感染和移植功能延迟的风险:一项初步的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Erfan Jelveh Moghaddam, Gholamreza Pourmand, Sara Ahmadi Badi, Hossein Yarmohammadi, Masood Soltanipur, Mehrdad Mahalleh, Mahdi Rezaei, Seyed Mohsen Mirhosseini, Seyed Davar Siadat","doi":"10.1177/03915603241276742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implication of gut microbiota in the gut-kidney axis affects the pathophysiology of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Gut microbiota composition changes during CKD. We aimed to determine the relative frequency of important gut microbiota members in end-stage renal disease (ERSD) patients before and after renal transplantation compared to healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen kidney transplant patients and 10 healthy subjects were recruited in this case-control prospective study. Fecal samples were taken sequentially from all patients before kidney transplantation, 1 week, and 1 month after it. The relative frequency of <i>Lactobacillus</i> spp., <i>Bifidobacterium</i> spp., <i>Akkermansia muciniphila, Bacteroides fragilis, Escherichia coli</i>, and <i>Faecalibacterium pruasnitzii</i> were determined through quantitative PCR. The obtained data was statistically analyzed by Stata software (Stata Corporation, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean log number of all bacteria was significantly higher in healthy individuals than kidney transplant recipients (<i>p</i> < 0.001) except for Lactobacillus where the mean levels were almost identical in the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.67). Moreover, 20% (3) of patients developed a urinary tract infection. Besides, 2 (13.33%) patients were diagnosed with delayed graft function. There were no statistically significant differences regarding changing trends in bacteria log number of <i>Akkermansia muciniphila</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.12), <i>Bacteroid fragilis</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.75), <i>Bifidobacterium</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.99), <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.5), <i>Faecalibacterium</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.98), and <i>Lactobacilli</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.93) between patients with and without delayed graft function (DGF).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gut microbiota composition in patients with ESRD was significantly different from those without it. However, the microbiota profile did not significantly differ in patients with and without DGF.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"781-787"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gut microbiota alterations in renal transplant recipients and the risk of urinary tract infection and delayed graft function: A preliminary prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Erfan Jelveh Moghaddam, Gholamreza Pourmand, Sara Ahmadi Badi, Hossein Yarmohammadi, Masood Soltanipur, Mehrdad Mahalleh, Mahdi Rezaei, Seyed Mohsen Mirhosseini, Seyed Davar Siadat\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03915603241276742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implication of gut microbiota in the gut-kidney axis affects the pathophysiology of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Gut microbiota composition changes during CKD. We aimed to determine the relative frequency of important gut microbiota members in end-stage renal disease (ERSD) patients before and after renal transplantation compared to healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen kidney transplant patients and 10 healthy subjects were recruited in this case-control prospective study. Fecal samples were taken sequentially from all patients before kidney transplantation, 1 week, and 1 month after it. The relative frequency of <i>Lactobacillus</i> spp., <i>Bifidobacterium</i> spp., <i>Akkermansia muciniphila, Bacteroides fragilis, Escherichia coli</i>, and <i>Faecalibacterium pruasnitzii</i> were determined through quantitative PCR. The obtained data was statistically analyzed by Stata software (Stata Corporation, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean log number of all bacteria was significantly higher in healthy individuals than kidney transplant recipients (<i>p</i> < 0.001) except for Lactobacillus where the mean levels were almost identical in the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.67). Moreover, 20% (3) of patients developed a urinary tract infection. Besides, 2 (13.33%) patients were diagnosed with delayed graft function. There were no statistically significant differences regarding changing trends in bacteria log number of <i>Akkermansia muciniphila</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.12), <i>Bacteroid fragilis</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.75), <i>Bifidobacterium</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.99), <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.5), <i>Faecalibacterium</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.98), and <i>Lactobacilli</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.93) between patients with and without delayed graft function (DGF).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gut microbiota composition in patients with ESRD was significantly different from those without it. However, the microbiota profile did not significantly differ in patients with and without DGF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"781-787\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241276742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241276742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gut microbiota alterations in renal transplant recipients and the risk of urinary tract infection and delayed graft function: A preliminary prospective study.
Background: The implication of gut microbiota in the gut-kidney axis affects the pathophysiology of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Gut microbiota composition changes during CKD. We aimed to determine the relative frequency of important gut microbiota members in end-stage renal disease (ERSD) patients before and after renal transplantation compared to healthy subjects.
Methods: Fifteen kidney transplant patients and 10 healthy subjects were recruited in this case-control prospective study. Fecal samples were taken sequentially from all patients before kidney transplantation, 1 week, and 1 month after it. The relative frequency of Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Akkermansia muciniphila, Bacteroides fragilis, Escherichia coli, and Faecalibacterium pruasnitzii were determined through quantitative PCR. The obtained data was statistically analyzed by Stata software (Stata Corporation, USA).
Results: The mean log number of all bacteria was significantly higher in healthy individuals than kidney transplant recipients (p < 0.001) except for Lactobacillus where the mean levels were almost identical in the two groups (p = 0.67). Moreover, 20% (3) of patients developed a urinary tract infection. Besides, 2 (13.33%) patients were diagnosed with delayed graft function. There were no statistically significant differences regarding changing trends in bacteria log number of Akkermansia muciniphila (p = 0.12), Bacteroid fragilis (p = 0.75), Bifidobacterium (p = 0.99), Escherichia coli (p = 0.5), Faecalibacterium (p = 0.98), and Lactobacilli (p = 0.93) between patients with and without delayed graft function (DGF).
Conclusion: Gut microbiota composition in patients with ESRD was significantly different from those without it. However, the microbiota profile did not significantly differ in patients with and without DGF.