收获后水产食品加工技术对性别平等和社会公正影响的系统审查。

IF 23.6 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Nature food Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1038/s43016-024-01034-6
Nitya Rao, Lee Hooper, Heather Gray, Natasha Grist, Johanna Forster, Julie Bremner, Ghezal Sabir, Matthew Heaton, Nisha Marwaha, Sudarshan Thakur, Abraham Wanyama, Liangzi Zhang
{"title":"收获后水产食品加工技术对性别平等和社会公正影响的系统审查。","authors":"Nitya Rao, Lee Hooper, Heather Gray, Natasha Grist, Johanna Forster, Julie Bremner, Ghezal Sabir, Matthew Heaton, Nisha Marwaha, Sudarshan Thakur, Abraham Wanyama, Liangzi Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s43016-024-01034-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-harvest practices and technologies are key to reducing global aquatic harvest loss. The lives of post-harvest fisheries workers, over half of them women, are deeply affected by these technologies, but their equity and equality outcomes are poorly understood. This systematic review synthesizes evidence of post-harvest aquatic food processing technology outcomes, showing that persistent inequalities in social structure and norms disadvantage women across a range of technologies, both traditional and improved, especially regarding control over resources. We found that improved technologies bring enhanced productivity and possibly income for workers, yet contracts are often precarious due to pre-existing social inequities. While power and control of resources is more unequal in factory settings, it is not necessarily equal in traditional contexts either, despite offering greater flexibility. More rigorous comparative research, including voices of diverse actors, is key to understanding the impacts of different technologies on gender equality and social justice and inform policymaking. Fisheries and aquaculture production are key to livelihoods, food and nutrition, yet over one-third of global aquatic harvest is lost or wasted. The post-harvest sector, key to reducing these losses, and dominated by women workers, is not well understood. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on equity and equality outcomes of post-harvest practices and technologies that aim to reduce loss and waste in the fisheries sector.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":23.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of the impact of post-harvest aquatic food processing technology on gender equality and social justice\",\"authors\":\"Nitya Rao, Lee Hooper, Heather Gray, Natasha Grist, Johanna Forster, Julie Bremner, Ghezal Sabir, Matthew Heaton, Nisha Marwaha, Sudarshan Thakur, Abraham Wanyama, Liangzi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43016-024-01034-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Post-harvest practices and technologies are key to reducing global aquatic harvest loss. The lives of post-harvest fisheries workers, over half of them women, are deeply affected by these technologies, but their equity and equality outcomes are poorly understood. This systematic review synthesizes evidence of post-harvest aquatic food processing technology outcomes, showing that persistent inequalities in social structure and norms disadvantage women across a range of technologies, both traditional and improved, especially regarding control over resources. We found that improved technologies bring enhanced productivity and possibly income for workers, yet contracts are often precarious due to pre-existing social inequities. While power and control of resources is more unequal in factory settings, it is not necessarily equal in traditional contexts either, despite offering greater flexibility. More rigorous comparative research, including voices of diverse actors, is key to understanding the impacts of different technologies on gender equality and social justice and inform policymaking. Fisheries and aquaculture production are key to livelihoods, food and nutrition, yet over one-third of global aquatic harvest is lost or wasted. The post-harvest sector, key to reducing these losses, and dominated by women workers, is not well understood. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on equity and equality outcomes of post-harvest practices and technologies that aim to reduce loss and waste in the fisheries sector.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature food\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":23.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature food\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-024-01034-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-024-01034-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

捕捞后操作和技术是减少全球水产捕捞损失的关键。捕捞后渔业工人(其中一半以上为女性)的生活深受这些技术的影响,但对其公平和平等的结果却知之甚少。这篇系统性综述综合了捕捞后水产食品加工技术成果的证据,表明在一系列传统和改良技术中,社会结构和规范中持续存在的不平等不利于妇女,尤其是在资源控制方面。我们发现,改良技术提高了生产率,并可能为工人带来收入,但由于先前存在的社会不平等,合同往往不稳定。虽然在工厂环境中,权力和对资源的控制更加不平等,但在传统环境中,权力和对资源的控制也不一定平等,尽管传统环境提供了更大的灵活性。更严格的比较研究,包括不同参与者的声音,是了解不同技术对性别平等和社会公正的影响并为决策提供信息的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of the impact of post-harvest aquatic food processing technology on gender equality and social justice
Post-harvest practices and technologies are key to reducing global aquatic harvest loss. The lives of post-harvest fisheries workers, over half of them women, are deeply affected by these technologies, but their equity and equality outcomes are poorly understood. This systematic review synthesizes evidence of post-harvest aquatic food processing technology outcomes, showing that persistent inequalities in social structure and norms disadvantage women across a range of technologies, both traditional and improved, especially regarding control over resources. We found that improved technologies bring enhanced productivity and possibly income for workers, yet contracts are often precarious due to pre-existing social inequities. While power and control of resources is more unequal in factory settings, it is not necessarily equal in traditional contexts either, despite offering greater flexibility. More rigorous comparative research, including voices of diverse actors, is key to understanding the impacts of different technologies on gender equality and social justice and inform policymaking. Fisheries and aquaculture production are key to livelihoods, food and nutrition, yet over one-third of global aquatic harvest is lost or wasted. The post-harvest sector, key to reducing these losses, and dominated by women workers, is not well understood. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on equity and equality outcomes of post-harvest practices and technologies that aim to reduce loss and waste in the fisheries sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
28.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diets cannot be sustainable without ensuring the well-being of communities, workers and animals in food value chains Regional variation in fish mercury Indigenous peoples’ rights should be recognized and strengthened to boost food innovation research The Dublin Declaration fails to recognize the need to reduce industrial animal agriculture Equity as a priority in EAT–Lancet-aligned food system transformations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1