{"title":"卡斯卡特酒花和卡兹贝克酒花植物化学成分和酿造特性的比较","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A four-year study compared the secondary metabolite profile of two flavour hops, the widely used Cascade and the new Czech variety Kazbek. The average alpha-acids and total essential oil of Kazbek and Cascade grown in Europe did not differ, while alpha-acids were 20 % higher in Cascade grown in the USA. Cluster analysis of essential oil composition distinguished the varieties, the markers being mainly farnesene derivatives. US-Cascade had higher terpenoids (geraniol, geranial) and lower fatty acid methyl esters than EU-Cascade. Both varieties have high and comparable levels of geraniol esters (230–360 mg/kg total) and low levels of free geraniol. The sulphur-containing volatile profile of US-Cascade and EU-Cascade hops differed significantly, probably as a result of treatment with different pesticides. The profile of hop-associated essential oils and aroma components of the single-variety experimental beers Kazbek and Cascade was similar for both whirlpool-hopped and additionally dry-hopped beers. Citrus and fruit notes were the dominant descriptors. Two independent sensory panels did not clearly distinguish or prefer beers hopped with Cascade and Kazbek hops, demonstrating the possibility of alternating between the two varieties in brewing. A new finding is that genetically distant hop varieties can provide similar sensory profiles in late- and dry-hopped beers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15867,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of phytochemical and brewing characteristics of Cascade and Kazbek hop cultivars\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A four-year study compared the secondary metabolite profile of two flavour hops, the widely used Cascade and the new Czech variety Kazbek. The average alpha-acids and total essential oil of Kazbek and Cascade grown in Europe did not differ, while alpha-acids were 20 % higher in Cascade grown in the USA. Cluster analysis of essential oil composition distinguished the varieties, the markers being mainly farnesene derivatives. US-Cascade had higher terpenoids (geraniol, geranial) and lower fatty acid methyl esters than EU-Cascade. Both varieties have high and comparable levels of geraniol esters (230–360 mg/kg total) and low levels of free geraniol. The sulphur-containing volatile profile of US-Cascade and EU-Cascade hops differed significantly, probably as a result of treatment with different pesticides. The profile of hop-associated essential oils and aroma components of the single-variety experimental beers Kazbek and Cascade was similar for both whirlpool-hopped and additionally dry-hopped beers. Citrus and fruit notes were the dominant descriptors. Two independent sensory panels did not clearly distinguish or prefer beers hopped with Cascade and Kazbek hops, demonstrating the possibility of alternating between the two varieties in brewing. A new finding is that genetically distant hop varieties can provide similar sensory profiles in late- and dry-hopped beers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157524007142\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889157524007142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of phytochemical and brewing characteristics of Cascade and Kazbek hop cultivars
A four-year study compared the secondary metabolite profile of two flavour hops, the widely used Cascade and the new Czech variety Kazbek. The average alpha-acids and total essential oil of Kazbek and Cascade grown in Europe did not differ, while alpha-acids were 20 % higher in Cascade grown in the USA. Cluster analysis of essential oil composition distinguished the varieties, the markers being mainly farnesene derivatives. US-Cascade had higher terpenoids (geraniol, geranial) and lower fatty acid methyl esters than EU-Cascade. Both varieties have high and comparable levels of geraniol esters (230–360 mg/kg total) and low levels of free geraniol. The sulphur-containing volatile profile of US-Cascade and EU-Cascade hops differed significantly, probably as a result of treatment with different pesticides. The profile of hop-associated essential oils and aroma components of the single-variety experimental beers Kazbek and Cascade was similar for both whirlpool-hopped and additionally dry-hopped beers. Citrus and fruit notes were the dominant descriptors. Two independent sensory panels did not clearly distinguish or prefer beers hopped with Cascade and Kazbek hops, demonstrating the possibility of alternating between the two varieties in brewing. A new finding is that genetically distant hop varieties can provide similar sensory profiles in late- and dry-hopped beers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Composition and Analysis publishes manuscripts on scientific aspects of data on the chemical composition of human foods, with particular emphasis on actual data on composition of foods; analytical methods; studies on the manipulation, storage, distribution and use of food composition data; and studies on the statistics, use and distribution of such data and data systems. The Journal''s basis is nutrient composition, with increasing emphasis on bioactive non-nutrient and anti-nutrient components. Papers must provide sufficient description of the food samples, analytical methods, quality control procedures and statistical treatments of the data to permit the end users of the food composition data to evaluate the appropriateness of such data in their projects.
The Journal does not publish papers on: microbiological compounds; sensory quality; aromatics/volatiles in food and wine; essential oils; organoleptic characteristics of food; physical properties; or clinical papers and pharmacology-related papers.