试点研究:去除悬浮固体技术对后续臭氧处理下水道溢流的影响

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Environmental Technology & Innovation Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.eti.2024.103770
Paige E. Peters , Alex J. Booton , Daniel H. Zitomer
{"title":"试点研究:去除悬浮固体技术对后续臭氧处理下水道溢流的影响","authors":"Paige E. Peters ,&nbsp;Alex J. Booton ,&nbsp;Daniel H. Zitomer","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2024.103770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Approximately 3.2 billion cubic meters of untreated sewer overflow water is discharged into U.S. lakes and rivers every year during high-intensity precipitation events posing both environmental and public health challenges. A decentralized, end-of-pipe sewer overflow treatment system would eliminate detrimental overflow effects by handling peak wet-weather flow and associated pollutant loadings. In this study, an overflow treatment system comprised of suspended solids removal followed by chemical oxidation was assessed. Three different suspended solids removal technologies were employed to determine their compatibility with subsequent ozonation and to estimate the treatment cost to meet Clean Water Act discharge permit requirements for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), and <em>Escherichia coli</em> (<em>E. coli</em>) in approximately 30 minutes of total treatment time. Both cloth media filtration with ozonation and chemically enhanced primary treatment with ozonation met permit limits for BOD, TSS, and <em>E. coli</em>, while conventional primary treatment only met permit limits for BOD and TSS, ostensibly due to lower TSS removal by conventional primary treatment. Initial suspended solids removal was a key parameter for effective, subsequent ozonation to remove BOD, achieve disinfection, and decrease operating costs. The estimated, simple operating cost was competitive with conventional activated sludge ($0.10/m<sup>3</sup> water treated, 2022 dollars). A full-scale decentralized, end-of-pipe treatment system could be operated as a “peaker facility” to handle large flows during storm events but remain idle during dry weather periods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 103770"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424002463/pdfft?md5=e26439f16cfa0b9bf41bb22adf3e4e7f&pid=1-s2.0-S2352186424002463-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot study: Impact of suspended solids removal technology on subsequent ozonation for sewer overflow treatment\",\"authors\":\"Paige E. Peters ,&nbsp;Alex J. Booton ,&nbsp;Daniel H. Zitomer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eti.2024.103770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Approximately 3.2 billion cubic meters of untreated sewer overflow water is discharged into U.S. lakes and rivers every year during high-intensity precipitation events posing both environmental and public health challenges. A decentralized, end-of-pipe sewer overflow treatment system would eliminate detrimental overflow effects by handling peak wet-weather flow and associated pollutant loadings. In this study, an overflow treatment system comprised of suspended solids removal followed by chemical oxidation was assessed. Three different suspended solids removal technologies were employed to determine their compatibility with subsequent ozonation and to estimate the treatment cost to meet Clean Water Act discharge permit requirements for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), and <em>Escherichia coli</em> (<em>E. coli</em>) in approximately 30 minutes of total treatment time. Both cloth media filtration with ozonation and chemically enhanced primary treatment with ozonation met permit limits for BOD, TSS, and <em>E. coli</em>, while conventional primary treatment only met permit limits for BOD and TSS, ostensibly due to lower TSS removal by conventional primary treatment. Initial suspended solids removal was a key parameter for effective, subsequent ozonation to remove BOD, achieve disinfection, and decrease operating costs. The estimated, simple operating cost was competitive with conventional activated sludge ($0.10/m<sup>3</sup> water treated, 2022 dollars). A full-scale decentralized, end-of-pipe treatment system could be operated as a “peaker facility” to handle large flows during storm events but remain idle during dry weather periods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Technology & Innovation\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103770\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424002463/pdfft?md5=e26439f16cfa0b9bf41bb22adf3e4e7f&pid=1-s2.0-S2352186424002463-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Technology & Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424002463\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424002463","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每年在高强度降水事件期间,约有 32 亿立方米未经处理的下水道溢流水被排入美国的湖泊和河流,给环境和公共卫生带来了挑战。分散式末端污水溢流处理系统可通过处理潮湿天气的峰值流量和相关污染物负荷,消除溢流的有害影响。在这项研究中,对由悬浮固体去除和化学氧化组成的溢流处理系统进行了评估。采用了三种不同的悬浮固体去除技术,以确定它们与后续臭氧处理的兼容性,并估算在总处理时间约 30 分钟内达到《清洁水法》排放许可要求的生化需氧量 (BOD)、总悬浮固体 (TSS) 和大肠杆菌 (E. coli) 的处理成本。布介质过滤加臭氧处理和化学强化一级处理加臭氧处理均能达到生化需氧量、总悬浮固体和大肠杆菌的许可限值,而传统的一级处理只能达到生化需氧量和总悬浮固体的许可限值,这显然是由于传统的一级处理对总悬浮固体的去除率较低。初始悬浮固体去除率是后续臭氧处理有效去除生化需氧量、实现消毒和降低运行成本的关键参数。估计的简单运行成本与传统活性污泥法相比具有竞争力(0.10 美元/立方米处理水,2022 年美元)。全规模的分散式末端处理系统可作为 "调峰设施 "运行,在暴雨期间处理大流量,但在干旱天气期间保持闲置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pilot study: Impact of suspended solids removal technology on subsequent ozonation for sewer overflow treatment

Approximately 3.2 billion cubic meters of untreated sewer overflow water is discharged into U.S. lakes and rivers every year during high-intensity precipitation events posing both environmental and public health challenges. A decentralized, end-of-pipe sewer overflow treatment system would eliminate detrimental overflow effects by handling peak wet-weather flow and associated pollutant loadings. In this study, an overflow treatment system comprised of suspended solids removal followed by chemical oxidation was assessed. Three different suspended solids removal technologies were employed to determine their compatibility with subsequent ozonation and to estimate the treatment cost to meet Clean Water Act discharge permit requirements for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), and Escherichia coli (E. coli) in approximately 30 minutes of total treatment time. Both cloth media filtration with ozonation and chemically enhanced primary treatment with ozonation met permit limits for BOD, TSS, and E. coli, while conventional primary treatment only met permit limits for BOD and TSS, ostensibly due to lower TSS removal by conventional primary treatment. Initial suspended solids removal was a key parameter for effective, subsequent ozonation to remove BOD, achieve disinfection, and decrease operating costs. The estimated, simple operating cost was competitive with conventional activated sludge ($0.10/m3 water treated, 2022 dollars). A full-scale decentralized, end-of-pipe treatment system could be operated as a “peaker facility” to handle large flows during storm events but remain idle during dry weather periods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
期刊最新文献
Remediation of Pb and Cd contaminated sediments by wheat straw biochar and microbial community analysis The ammonium transporter AmtB is dispensable for the uptake of ammonium in the phototrophic diazotroph Rhodopseudomonas palustris An innovative sustainable solution: Recycling shield-discharge waste soil as fine aggregate to produce eco-friendly geopolymer-based flowable backfill materials Assessing subgroup differences and underlying causes of ozone-associated mortality burden in China using multi-source data Synchronously improving intracellular electron transfer in electron-donating bacteria and electron-accepting methanogens for facilitating direct interspecies electron transfer during anaerobic digestion of kitchen wastes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1