在人体比目鱼肌上,运动点刺激激活的 Ia 感觉神经少于周围神经刺激激活的 Ia 感觉神经。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1152/jn.00474.2023
Naotsugu Kaneko, Atsushi Sasaki, Kai Lon Fok, Hikaru Yokoyama, Kimitaka Nakazawa, Kei Masani
{"title":"在人体比目鱼肌上,运动点刺激激活的 Ia 感觉神经少于周围神经刺激激活的 Ia 感觉神经。","authors":"Naotsugu Kaneko, Atsushi Sasaki, Kai Lon Fok, Hikaru Yokoyama, Kimitaka Nakazawa, Kei Masani","doi":"10.1152/jn.00474.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and motor point stimulation (MPS) are noninvasive techniques used to induce muscle contraction, aiding motor function restoration in individuals with neurological disorders. Understanding sensory inputs from PNS and MPS is crucial for facilitating neuroplasticity and restoring impaired motor function. Although previous studies suggest that MPS could induce Ia-sensory inputs less than PNS, experimental evidence supporting this claim is insufficient. Here, we implemented a conditioning paradigm combining transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with PNS or MPS to investigate their Ia-sensory inputs. This paradigm induces postactivation depression of spinal reflexes associated with transient decreases in neurotransmitter release from Ia-afferent terminals, allowing us to examine the Ia-sensory input amount from PNS and MPS based on the depression degree. We hypothesized that MPS would induce less postactivation depression than PNS. Thirteen individuals underwent MPS and PNS on the soleus muscle as conditioning stimuli, with tSCS applied to the skin between the spinous processes (L1-L2) as test stimuli. PNS- and MPS-conditioned spinal reflexes were recorded at five interstimulus intervals (ISIs) and four intensities. Results revealed that all PNS conditioning showed significant decreases in spinal reflex amplitudes, indicating postactivation depression. Furthermore, PNS conditioning exhibited greater depression for shorter ISIs and higher conditioning intensities. In contrast, MPS conditioning demonstrated intensity-dependent depression, but without all-conditioning depression and clear ISI dependency as seen in PNS conditioning. In addition, PNS induced significantly greater depression than MPS across most conditions. Our findings provide experimental evidence supporting the conclusion that MPS activates Ia-sensory nerves less than PNS.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and motor point stimulation (MPS) induce neuroplasticity, but differences in their effects on Ia-sensory inputs are unclear. We investigated their Ia-sensory inputs using a conditioning paradigm with spinal reflexes. Results showed that PNS conditioning significantly inhibited spinal reflexes than MPS conditioning, indicating greater postactivation depression due to Ia-sensory nerve activation. These findings provide experimental evidence that MPS activates Ia-sensory nerves to a lesser extent than PNS, enhancing our understanding of neuroplasticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motor point stimulation activates fewer Ia-sensory nerves than peripheral nerve stimulation in human soleus muscle.\",\"authors\":\"Naotsugu Kaneko, Atsushi Sasaki, Kai Lon Fok, Hikaru Yokoyama, Kimitaka Nakazawa, Kei Masani\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/jn.00474.2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and motor point stimulation (MPS) are noninvasive techniques used to induce muscle contraction, aiding motor function restoration in individuals with neurological disorders. Understanding sensory inputs from PNS and MPS is crucial for facilitating neuroplasticity and restoring impaired motor function. Although previous studies suggest that MPS could induce Ia-sensory inputs less than PNS, experimental evidence supporting this claim is insufficient. Here, we implemented a conditioning paradigm combining transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with PNS or MPS to investigate their Ia-sensory inputs. This paradigm induces postactivation depression of spinal reflexes associated with transient decreases in neurotransmitter release from Ia-afferent terminals, allowing us to examine the Ia-sensory input amount from PNS and MPS based on the depression degree. We hypothesized that MPS would induce less postactivation depression than PNS. Thirteen individuals underwent MPS and PNS on the soleus muscle as conditioning stimuli, with tSCS applied to the skin between the spinous processes (L1-L2) as test stimuli. PNS- and MPS-conditioned spinal reflexes were recorded at five interstimulus intervals (ISIs) and four intensities. Results revealed that all PNS conditioning showed significant decreases in spinal reflex amplitudes, indicating postactivation depression. Furthermore, PNS conditioning exhibited greater depression for shorter ISIs and higher conditioning intensities. In contrast, MPS conditioning demonstrated intensity-dependent depression, but without all-conditioning depression and clear ISI dependency as seen in PNS conditioning. In addition, PNS induced significantly greater depression than MPS across most conditions. Our findings provide experimental evidence supporting the conclusion that MPS activates Ia-sensory nerves less than PNS.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and motor point stimulation (MPS) induce neuroplasticity, but differences in their effects on Ia-sensory inputs are unclear. We investigated their Ia-sensory inputs using a conditioning paradigm with spinal reflexes. Results showed that PNS conditioning significantly inhibited spinal reflexes than MPS conditioning, indicating greater postactivation depression due to Ia-sensory nerve activation. These findings provide experimental evidence that MPS activates Ia-sensory nerves to a lesser extent than PNS, enhancing our understanding of neuroplasticity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00474.2023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00474.2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

周围神经刺激(PNS)和运动点刺激(MPS)是一种非侵入性技术,用于诱导肌肉收缩,帮助神经系统疾病患者恢复运动功能。了解 PNS 和 MPS 的感觉输入对于促进神经可塑性和恢复受损的运动功能至关重要。尽管之前的研究表明,MPS 诱发的 Ia 感觉输入少于 PNS,但支持这一说法的实验证据并不充分。在这里,我们采用了一种将经皮脊髓刺激(tSCS)与 PNS 或 MPS 结合起来的调节范式,以研究它们的 Ia 感觉输入。这种范式会诱发脊髓反射激活后抑制,与 Ia 传入终端神经递质释放的短暂减少有关,从而使我们能够根据抑制程度来研究 PNS 和 MPS 的 Ia 感觉输入量。我们假设 MPS 引起的激活后抑制程度低于 PNS。13 人在比目鱼肌上接受了 MPS 和 PNS 作为条件刺激,在棘突(L1-L2)之间的皮肤上接受了 tSCS 作为测试刺激。在五种刺激间隔(ISI)和四种强度下记录 PNS 和 MPS 条件脊髓反射。结果显示,所有 PNS 条件均显示脊髓反射振幅显著下降,表明激活后抑制。此外,PNS 条件在较短的 ISI 和较高的条件强度下表现出更大的抑制。与此相反,MPS 条件反射表现出强度依赖性抑制,但不像 PNS 条件反射那样表现出全部条件反射抑制和明显的 ISI 依赖性。此外,在大多数条件下,PNS 诱导的抑制明显大于 MPS。我们的研究结果为 MPS 比 PNS 更少激活 Ia 感觉神经这一结论提供了实验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Motor point stimulation activates fewer Ia-sensory nerves than peripheral nerve stimulation in human soleus muscle.

Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and motor point stimulation (MPS) are noninvasive techniques used to induce muscle contraction, aiding motor function restoration in individuals with neurological disorders. Understanding sensory inputs from PNS and MPS is crucial for facilitating neuroplasticity and restoring impaired motor function. Although previous studies suggest that MPS could induce Ia-sensory inputs less than PNS, experimental evidence supporting this claim is insufficient. Here, we implemented a conditioning paradigm combining transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with PNS or MPS to investigate their Ia-sensory inputs. This paradigm induces postactivation depression of spinal reflexes associated with transient decreases in neurotransmitter release from Ia-afferent terminals, allowing us to examine the Ia-sensory input amount from PNS and MPS based on the depression degree. We hypothesized that MPS would induce less postactivation depression than PNS. Thirteen individuals underwent MPS and PNS on the soleus muscle as conditioning stimuli, with tSCS applied to the skin between the spinous processes (L1-L2) as test stimuli. PNS- and MPS-conditioned spinal reflexes were recorded at five interstimulus intervals (ISIs) and four intensities. Results revealed that all PNS conditioning showed significant decreases in spinal reflex amplitudes, indicating postactivation depression. Furthermore, PNS conditioning exhibited greater depression for shorter ISIs and higher conditioning intensities. In contrast, MPS conditioning demonstrated intensity-dependent depression, but without all-conditioning depression and clear ISI dependency as seen in PNS conditioning. In addition, PNS induced significantly greater depression than MPS across most conditions. Our findings provide experimental evidence supporting the conclusion that MPS activates Ia-sensory nerves less than PNS.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and motor point stimulation (MPS) induce neuroplasticity, but differences in their effects on Ia-sensory inputs are unclear. We investigated their Ia-sensory inputs using a conditioning paradigm with spinal reflexes. Results showed that PNS conditioning significantly inhibited spinal reflexes than MPS conditioning, indicating greater postactivation depression due to Ia-sensory nerve activation. These findings provide experimental evidence that MPS activates Ia-sensory nerves to a lesser extent than PNS, enhancing our understanding of neuroplasticity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
期刊最新文献
A 5-week centrifuge-based G training with feedback on the magnitude of G force, does not improve the perception of roll tilt during simulated coordinated turns. ALTERED CONTROL OF BREATHING IN A RAT MODEL OF ALLERGIC LOWER AIRWAY INFLAMMATION. Ictal and interictal epileptic networks of 34 patients with Hypothalamic Hamartoma on scalp electroencephalography. Investigating premotor corticospinal excitability in fast and slow voluntary contractions of the elbow flexors. Rat movements reflect internal decision dynamics in an evidence accumulation task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1