Jingying Huang , Jiaojiao Chen , Jin Yang , Mengbo Han , Zihao Xue , Yina Wang , Miaomiao Xu , Haiou Qi , Yuting Wang
{"title":"肝移植后急性肾损伤的预测模型:系统回顾与批判性评估","authors":"Jingying Huang , Jiaojiao Chen , Jin Yang , Mengbo Han , Zihao Xue , Yina Wang , Miaomiao Xu , Haiou Qi , Yuting Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to systematically review and critical evaluation of the risk of bias and the applicability of existing prediction models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Data source</h3><p>A comprehensive literature search up until February 7, 2024, was conducted across nine databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Systematic review of observational studies.</p></div><div><h3>Extraction methods</h3><p>Literature screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two researchers using a standardized checklist designed for the critical appraisal of prediction modelling studies in systematic reviews. The prediction model risk of bias assessment tool was utilized to assess both the risk of bias and the models’ applicability.</p></div><div><h3>Principal findings</h3><p>Thirty studies were included, identifying 34 prediction models. External validation was conducted in seven studies, while internal validation exclusively took place in eight studies. Three models were subjected to both internal and external validation, the area under the curve ranging from 0.610 to 0.921. A <em>meta</em>-analysis of high-frequency predictors identified several statistically significant factors, including recipient body mass index, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, preoperative albumin levels, international normalized ratio, and surgical-related factors such as cold ischemia time. All studies were demonstrated a high risk of bias, mainly due to the use of unsuitable data sources and inadequate detail in the analysis reporting.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The evaluation with prediction model risk of bias assessment tool indicated a considerable bias risk in current predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Clinical Practice</h3><p>The recognition of high bias in existing models calls for future research to employ rigorous methodologies and robust data sources, aiming to develop and validate more accurate and clinically applicable predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103808"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001939/pdfft?md5=a2b02115436864972c63a8125f83ebbe&pid=1-s2.0-S0964339724001939-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction models for acute kidney injury following liver transplantation: A systematic review and critical appraisal\",\"authors\":\"Jingying Huang , Jiaojiao Chen , Jin Yang , Mengbo Han , Zihao Xue , Yina Wang , Miaomiao Xu , Haiou Qi , Yuting Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to systematically review and critical evaluation of the risk of bias and the applicability of existing prediction models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Data source</h3><p>A comprehensive literature search up until February 7, 2024, was conducted across nine databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Systematic review of observational studies.</p></div><div><h3>Extraction methods</h3><p>Literature screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two researchers using a standardized checklist designed for the critical appraisal of prediction modelling studies in systematic reviews. The prediction model risk of bias assessment tool was utilized to assess both the risk of bias and the models’ applicability.</p></div><div><h3>Principal findings</h3><p>Thirty studies were included, identifying 34 prediction models. External validation was conducted in seven studies, while internal validation exclusively took place in eight studies. Three models were subjected to both internal and external validation, the area under the curve ranging from 0.610 to 0.921. A <em>meta</em>-analysis of high-frequency predictors identified several statistically significant factors, including recipient body mass index, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, preoperative albumin levels, international normalized ratio, and surgical-related factors such as cold ischemia time. All studies were demonstrated a high risk of bias, mainly due to the use of unsuitable data sources and inadequate detail in the analysis reporting.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The evaluation with prediction model risk of bias assessment tool indicated a considerable bias risk in current predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Clinical Practice</h3><p>The recognition of high bias in existing models calls for future research to employ rigorous methodologies and robust data sources, aiming to develop and validate more accurate and clinically applicable predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103808\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001939/pdfft?md5=a2b02115436864972c63a8125f83ebbe&pid=1-s2.0-S0964339724001939-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001939\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724001939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prediction models for acute kidney injury following liver transplantation: A systematic review and critical appraisal
Objective
This study aims to systematically review and critical evaluation of the risk of bias and the applicability of existing prediction models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.
Data source
A comprehensive literature search up until February 7, 2024, was conducted across nine databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP.
Study design
Systematic review of observational studies.
Extraction methods
Literature screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two researchers using a standardized checklist designed for the critical appraisal of prediction modelling studies in systematic reviews. The prediction model risk of bias assessment tool was utilized to assess both the risk of bias and the models’ applicability.
Principal findings
Thirty studies were included, identifying 34 prediction models. External validation was conducted in seven studies, while internal validation exclusively took place in eight studies. Three models were subjected to both internal and external validation, the area under the curve ranging from 0.610 to 0.921. A meta-analysis of high-frequency predictors identified several statistically significant factors, including recipient body mass index, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, preoperative albumin levels, international normalized ratio, and surgical-related factors such as cold ischemia time. All studies were demonstrated a high risk of bias, mainly due to the use of unsuitable data sources and inadequate detail in the analysis reporting.
Conclusions
The evaluation with prediction model risk of bias assessment tool indicated a considerable bias risk in current predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.
Implications for Clinical Practice
The recognition of high bias in existing models calls for future research to employ rigorous methodologies and robust data sources, aiming to develop and validate more accurate and clinically applicable predictive models for acute kidney injury post liver transplantation.
期刊介绍:
The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.