问题饮酒青少年分布式错误相关神经激活的性别差异

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Drug and alcohol dependence Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112421
Jillian E. Hardee, Alexander S. Weigard, Mary M. Heitzeg, Meghan E. Martz, Lora M. Cope
{"title":"问题饮酒青少年分布式错误相关神经激活的性别差异","authors":"Jillian E. Hardee,&nbsp;Alexander S. Weigard,&nbsp;Mary M. Heitzeg,&nbsp;Meghan E. Martz,&nbsp;Lora M. Cope","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Detecting and responding to errors is central to goal-directed behavior and cognitive control and is thought to be supported by a network of structures that includes the anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula. Sex differences in the maturational timing of cognitive control systems create differential periods of vulnerability for psychiatric conditions, such as substance use disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We examined sex differences in error-related activation across an array of distributed brain regions during a Go/No-Go task in young adults with problem alcohol use (<em>N</em>=69; 34 females; <em>M</em>=19.4 years). Regions of interest previously linked to error-related activation, including anterior cingulate cortex, insula, and frontoparietal structures, were selected in a term-based meta-analysis. Individual differences in their responses to false alarm (FA) inhibitory errors relative to “go” trials (FA&gt;GO) and correct rejections (FA&gt;CR) were indexed using multivariate summary measures derived from principal components analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>FA&gt;GO and FA&gt;CR activation both revealed a first component that explained the majority of the variance across error-associated regions and displayed the strongest loadings on salience network structures. Compared to females, males exhibited significantly higher levels of the FA&gt;GO component but not the FA&gt;CR component.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Males exhibit greater salience network activation in response to inhibitory errors, which could be attributed to sex differences in error-monitoring processes or to other functions (e.g., novelty detection). The findings are relevant for the further characterization of sex differences in cognitive control and may have implications for understanding individual differences in those at risk for substance use or other cognitive control disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 112421"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in distributed error-related neural activation in problem-drinking young adults\",\"authors\":\"Jillian E. Hardee,&nbsp;Alexander S. Weigard,&nbsp;Mary M. Heitzeg,&nbsp;Meghan E. Martz,&nbsp;Lora M. Cope\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Detecting and responding to errors is central to goal-directed behavior and cognitive control and is thought to be supported by a network of structures that includes the anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula. Sex differences in the maturational timing of cognitive control systems create differential periods of vulnerability for psychiatric conditions, such as substance use disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We examined sex differences in error-related activation across an array of distributed brain regions during a Go/No-Go task in young adults with problem alcohol use (<em>N</em>=69; 34 females; <em>M</em>=19.4 years). Regions of interest previously linked to error-related activation, including anterior cingulate cortex, insula, and frontoparietal structures, were selected in a term-based meta-analysis. Individual differences in their responses to false alarm (FA) inhibitory errors relative to “go” trials (FA&gt;GO) and correct rejections (FA&gt;CR) were indexed using multivariate summary measures derived from principal components analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>FA&gt;GO and FA&gt;CR activation both revealed a first component that explained the majority of the variance across error-associated regions and displayed the strongest loadings on salience network structures. Compared to females, males exhibited significantly higher levels of the FA&gt;GO component but not the FA&gt;CR component.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Males exhibit greater salience network activation in response to inhibitory errors, which could be attributed to sex differences in error-monitoring processes or to other functions (e.g., novelty detection). The findings are relevant for the further characterization of sex differences in cognitive control and may have implications for understanding individual differences in those at risk for substance use or other cognitive control disorders.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"volume\":\"263 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871624013462\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871624013462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景检测错误并对其做出反应是目标导向行为和认知控制的核心,被认为得到了包括前扣带皮层和前脑岛在内的结构网络的支持。认知控制系统成熟时间上的性别差异造成了不同时期的精神疾病易感性,如药物使用障碍。方法 我们研究了有酗酒问题的年轻成年人(N=69;34 名女性;M=19.4 岁)在进行 Go/No-Go 任务时,错误相关激活在一系列分布式大脑区域的性别差异。在基于术语的荟萃分析中选择了以前与错误相关激活有关的相关区域,包括前扣带回皮层、脑岛和额顶叶结构。结果FA>GO和FA>CR激活都显示了一个第一成分,它解释了错误相关区域的大部分变异,并显示了对显著性网络结构的最强负载。与女性相比,男性的FA>GO分量水平明显更高,但FA>CR分量水平却不高。结论男性在抑制性错误时表现出更高的显著性网络激活,这可能是由于错误监控过程中的性别差异或其他功能(如新奇事物检测)。这些发现对进一步描述认知控制中的性别差异具有重要意义,并可能对理解药物使用或其他认知控制障碍高危人群的个体差异产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex differences in distributed error-related neural activation in problem-drinking young adults

Background

Detecting and responding to errors is central to goal-directed behavior and cognitive control and is thought to be supported by a network of structures that includes the anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula. Sex differences in the maturational timing of cognitive control systems create differential periods of vulnerability for psychiatric conditions, such as substance use disorders.

Methods

We examined sex differences in error-related activation across an array of distributed brain regions during a Go/No-Go task in young adults with problem alcohol use (N=69; 34 females; M=19.4 years). Regions of interest previously linked to error-related activation, including anterior cingulate cortex, insula, and frontoparietal structures, were selected in a term-based meta-analysis. Individual differences in their responses to false alarm (FA) inhibitory errors relative to “go” trials (FA>GO) and correct rejections (FA>CR) were indexed using multivariate summary measures derived from principal components analysis.

Results

FA>GO and FA>CR activation both revealed a first component that explained the majority of the variance across error-associated regions and displayed the strongest loadings on salience network structures. Compared to females, males exhibited significantly higher levels of the FA>GO component but not the FA>CR component.

Conclusions

Males exhibit greater salience network activation in response to inhibitory errors, which could be attributed to sex differences in error-monitoring processes or to other functions (e.g., novelty detection). The findings are relevant for the further characterization of sex differences in cognitive control and may have implications for understanding individual differences in those at risk for substance use or other cognitive control disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence
Drug and alcohol dependence 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
409
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.
期刊最新文献
Does implementation of office based addiction treatment by a nurse care manager increase the duration of OUD treatment in primary care? A secondary analysis of the PROUD randomized control trial Frequency of supervised consumption service use and acute care utilization in people who inject drugs Revisiting the alcohol-aggression link: The impact of alcohol consumption patterns Selective dopamine D3 receptor partial agonist (±)VK4-40 reduces the reinforcing strength of d-amphetamine but not cocaine in rhesus monkeys responding under a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement The relationship between young people, social media use and alcohol use: A prospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1