评估多发性硬化症患者的体力活动水平:应该使用标准化还是个性化的临界值?

{"title":"评估多发性硬化症患者的体力活动水平:应该使用标准化还是个性化的临界值?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bbii.2024.100082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessing and monitoring the level of physical activity in people with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) seems central as physical activity has been considered a main therapy for maintaining autonomy and improving quality of life in this population. One of the main strategies to evaluate objectively the level of physical activity of PwMS in an ecological context is the use of accelerometers. These on-board devices allow to easily convert physical measurement (acceleration) in a more intuitive outcome as the time doing moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) by PwMS. The challenge in this conversion is the use of the appropriate cutoff as PwMS present different physical profiles. To overcome this problem, an interesting alternative should be the determination of personalized cutoffs. This study aimed to determine how much the measurement of the MVPA levels in PwMS differed when using a personalized and generic cutoff. The study was conducted on a group of 28 PwMS. An accelerometer was given to PwMS for use on their non-dominant hip for 14 days. They were instructed to wear it every day from waking up until bedtime. Data collected on the accelerometer were processed and time spending in MVPA was computed with a personalized and generic cutoff. Our findings revealed a difference of 78 % in measuring MVPA using a personalized and generic MVPA cutoff in PwMS. Given the crucial role of PA in managing multiple sclerosis, it seems important to better determine personalized MVPA cutoffs before the assessment of daily life performance of PwMS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100197,"journal":{"name":"Brain Behavior and Immunity Integrative","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949834124000382/pdfft?md5=31e45912e2a5d43e17b5a215936997d2&pid=1-s2.0-S2949834124000382-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing physical activity levels in people with multiple sclerosis: Should be used standardized or individualized cutoff?\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbii.2024.100082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Assessing and monitoring the level of physical activity in people with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) seems central as physical activity has been considered a main therapy for maintaining autonomy and improving quality of life in this population. One of the main strategies to evaluate objectively the level of physical activity of PwMS in an ecological context is the use of accelerometers. These on-board devices allow to easily convert physical measurement (acceleration) in a more intuitive outcome as the time doing moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) by PwMS. The challenge in this conversion is the use of the appropriate cutoff as PwMS present different physical profiles. To overcome this problem, an interesting alternative should be the determination of personalized cutoffs. This study aimed to determine how much the measurement of the MVPA levels in PwMS differed when using a personalized and generic cutoff. The study was conducted on a group of 28 PwMS. An accelerometer was given to PwMS for use on their non-dominant hip for 14 days. They were instructed to wear it every day from waking up until bedtime. Data collected on the accelerometer were processed and time spending in MVPA was computed with a personalized and generic cutoff. Our findings revealed a difference of 78 % in measuring MVPA using a personalized and generic MVPA cutoff in PwMS. Given the crucial role of PA in managing multiple sclerosis, it seems important to better determine personalized MVPA cutoffs before the assessment of daily life performance of PwMS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Behavior and Immunity Integrative\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949834124000382/pdfft?md5=31e45912e2a5d43e17b5a215936997d2&pid=1-s2.0-S2949834124000382-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Behavior and Immunity Integrative\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949834124000382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Behavior and Immunity Integrative","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949834124000382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估和监测多发性硬化症患者(PwMS)的体力活动水平似乎非常重要,因为体力活动一直被认为是维持多发性硬化症患者自理能力和提高生活质量的主要疗法。使用加速度计是在生态环境中客观评估多发性硬化症患者体力活动水平的主要策略之一。这些车载设备可以轻松地将物理测量值(加速度)转换成更直观的结果,即 PwMS 进行中度到剧烈运动(MVPA)的时间。由于 PwMS 的身体状况各不相同,因此这种转换的难点在于如何使用适当的分界线。为了解决这个问题,一个有趣的替代方法应该是确定个性化的临界值。本研究旨在确定在使用个性化和通用截断值时,测量 PwMS MVPA 水平的差异有多大。研究对象是一组 28 名残疾人。研究人员将加速度计戴在残疾人的非主导髋部,为期 14 天。他们被要求每天从起床到睡觉前都佩戴加速度计。我们对加速度计上收集到的数据进行了处理,并计算了 MVPA 所花费的时间,采用的是个性化和通用截止值。我们的研究结果表明,在使用个性化和通用 MVPA 临界值测量 PwMS 的 MVPA 时,两者之间的差异为 78%。鉴于运动量在控制多发性硬化症中的关键作用,在评估 PwMS 的日常生活表现之前,更好地确定个性化 MVPA 临界值似乎非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing physical activity levels in people with multiple sclerosis: Should be used standardized or individualized cutoff?

Assessing and monitoring the level of physical activity in people with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) seems central as physical activity has been considered a main therapy for maintaining autonomy and improving quality of life in this population. One of the main strategies to evaluate objectively the level of physical activity of PwMS in an ecological context is the use of accelerometers. These on-board devices allow to easily convert physical measurement (acceleration) in a more intuitive outcome as the time doing moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) by PwMS. The challenge in this conversion is the use of the appropriate cutoff as PwMS present different physical profiles. To overcome this problem, an interesting alternative should be the determination of personalized cutoffs. This study aimed to determine how much the measurement of the MVPA levels in PwMS differed when using a personalized and generic cutoff. The study was conducted on a group of 28 PwMS. An accelerometer was given to PwMS for use on their non-dominant hip for 14 days. They were instructed to wear it every day from waking up until bedtime. Data collected on the accelerometer were processed and time spending in MVPA was computed with a personalized and generic cutoff. Our findings revealed a difference of 78 % in measuring MVPA using a personalized and generic MVPA cutoff in PwMS. Given the crucial role of PA in managing multiple sclerosis, it seems important to better determine personalized MVPA cutoffs before the assessment of daily life performance of PwMS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The unpaved road of ayahuasca, a psychoactive brew, as a treatment for neuropathic pain: A review of mechanistic insights and clinical prospects Advances of the risk factors, immune and inflammation, therapy in postpartum post-traumatic stress disorder Phytochemical characterization and evaluation of anti-amnesic activity of two source plants of Shankhapushpi Assessing physical activity levels in people with multiple sclerosis: Should be used standardized or individualized cutoff? Divergent immune profiles in distinct populations - A vietnamese-german comparison
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1