为可持续气候未来建立超越增长视角的模型:重新思考共享社会经济路径的理由

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103705
{"title":"为可持续气候未来建立超越增长视角的模型:重新思考共享社会经济路径的理由","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>IPCC Assessment Reports narrate a particular story of possible futures within a climate constrained world. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways that are used to model these futures afford economic growth a prominent place, with its absence indicating negative sustainability outcomes. Critical post- and beyond growth perspectives, however, have shown the incompatibility between socially just and environmentally sustainable climate outcomes and compound increases in material and energy use. This Perspective piece outlines the opportunities to rethink Shared Socioeconomic Pathways based on degrowth principles to trouble dominant ways of narrating climate breakdown. Our approach is rooted in the need for future approaches (such as CMIP7) to adopt new economic models that ground climate-changed futures beyond economic growth. We follow recent work by others that has argued for, sketched out, or formulated new approaches to understanding climatic processes using alternative post-growth and degrowth processes; and build on it by outlining what a degrowth-infused Shared Socioeconomic Pathway might look like and highlighting the transformative potential of such an approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002962/pdfft?md5=f5ed8f017a4b9104d75b9d840d55ecdb&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624002962-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling beyond growth perspectives for sustainable climate futures: The case for rethinking Shared Socioeconomic Pathways\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>IPCC Assessment Reports narrate a particular story of possible futures within a climate constrained world. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways that are used to model these futures afford economic growth a prominent place, with its absence indicating negative sustainability outcomes. Critical post- and beyond growth perspectives, however, have shown the incompatibility between socially just and environmentally sustainable climate outcomes and compound increases in material and energy use. This Perspective piece outlines the opportunities to rethink Shared Socioeconomic Pathways based on degrowth principles to trouble dominant ways of narrating climate breakdown. Our approach is rooted in the need for future approaches (such as CMIP7) to adopt new economic models that ground climate-changed futures beyond economic growth. We follow recent work by others that has argued for, sketched out, or formulated new approaches to understanding climatic processes using alternative post-growth and degrowth processes; and build on it by outlining what a degrowth-infused Shared Socioeconomic Pathway might look like and highlighting the transformative potential of such an approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002962/pdfft?md5=f5ed8f017a4b9104d75b9d840d55ecdb&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624002962-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002962\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002962","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政府间气候变化专门委员会的评估报告讲述了在气候受限的世界中可能出现的未来。用于模拟这些未来的 "共享社会经济路径 "将经济增长置于重要位置,经济增长的缺失会带来负面的可持续性结果。然而,"后增长 "和 "超越增长 "的批判性观点表明,社会公正和环境可持续的气候结果与物质和能源使用的复合增长之间是不相容的。这篇《视角》文章概述了重新思考基于退步增长原则的 "共享社会经济路径 "的机会,从而对描述气候破坏的主流方式提出质疑。我们的方法源于未来的方法(如 CMIP7)需要采用新的经济模型,将气候改变的未来置于经济增长之外。最近,其他一些学者提出、勾画或制定了新的方法,利用替代性后增长和退化过程来理解气候过程;在此基础上,我们概述了注入退化因素的共享社会经济路径可能是什么样的,并强调了这种方法的变革潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modelling beyond growth perspectives for sustainable climate futures: The case for rethinking Shared Socioeconomic Pathways

IPCC Assessment Reports narrate a particular story of possible futures within a climate constrained world. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways that are used to model these futures afford economic growth a prominent place, with its absence indicating negative sustainability outcomes. Critical post- and beyond growth perspectives, however, have shown the incompatibility between socially just and environmentally sustainable climate outcomes and compound increases in material and energy use. This Perspective piece outlines the opportunities to rethink Shared Socioeconomic Pathways based on degrowth principles to trouble dominant ways of narrating climate breakdown. Our approach is rooted in the need for future approaches (such as CMIP7) to adopt new economic models that ground climate-changed futures beyond economic growth. We follow recent work by others that has argued for, sketched out, or formulated new approaches to understanding climatic processes using alternative post-growth and degrowth processes; and build on it by outlining what a degrowth-infused Shared Socioeconomic Pathway might look like and highlighting the transformative potential of such an approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Juggling the basics: How much does an income increase affect energy spending of low-income households in England? The informality-energy innovation-finance nexus: Sustainable business models for microgrid-based off-grid urban energy access The future of fossil fuels, chemicals, and feedstocks: Outlining a research agenda on the role of China in the global petrochemical industry Green hydrogen transitions deepen socioecological risks and extractivist patterns: evidence from 28 prospective exporting countries in the Global South Unpacking travel needs and experiences: Insights from qualitative interviews with affordable housing residents in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1