Cough severity visual analog scale scores and quality of life in patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough

Background

Refractory chronic cough (RCC) and unexplained chronic cough (UCC) adversely affect patients’ quality of life (QoL). This multicenter, non-interventional study evaluates the relationship between cough severity and QoL and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in Spanish outpatients.

Methods

RCC/UCC patients self-administered a printed survey comprising the cough-severity visual analog scale (VAS), adapted Cough Severity Diary (CSD), and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), plus purpose-designed items regarding the physical and everyday-life impact of cough. Patients were stratified into VAS score tertiles. The impact of cough on QoL and other PROs in each tertile, and relationships between LCQ scores and the tertiles, were assessed.

Results

The VAS was completed by 189 patients, and VAS score tertiles were identified as 0–50, 60–70, and 80–100 mm. The only between-tertile difference in demographic or cough characteristics was cough duration. VAS score tertiles were linearly associated with mean LCQ domain and total scores, as well as the proportion of patients with the highest scores on all adapted CSD items, and almost all physical and everyday-life impact items. In multiple linear-regression models, an increase of one tertile in the VAS score was associated with a decrease of 2.23 points in the LCQ total score, indicating poorer cough-related QoL.

Conclusion

As self-assessed in patients with RCC/UCC, cough-severity VAS scores were strongly associated with the impact of cough on QoL and everyday life. Patients with VAS scores of 60–100 mm reported the greatest impact and thus may benefit the most from targeted cough therapies.