调查通过社交媒体传播的产科相关教育材料的准确性

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the National Medical Association Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jnma.2024.07.015
Ogechukwu S. Anwaegbu BS, Smiti Gandhi BS, Gengi E. Kleto BS, Mitaire Erhieyovew BS, Deniz Isikkent MD, Rovnat Babazade MD
{"title":"调查通过社交媒体传播的产科相关教育材料的准确性","authors":"Ogechukwu S. Anwaegbu BS,&nbsp;Smiti Gandhi BS,&nbsp;Gengi E. Kleto BS,&nbsp;Mitaire Erhieyovew BS,&nbsp;Deniz Isikkent MD,&nbsp;Rovnat Babazade MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2024.07.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In recent times, healthcare providers have leveraged Instagram to share insights into their medical specialty, providing educational content to the public in a format distinct from traditional medical norms. However, the medical domain on Instagram lacks the same level of regulation, potentially resulting in the dissemination of inaccurate information3, impacting patient experiences and health outcomes. Our study aims to evaluate the quality and accuracy of obstetric anesthesia-related content on Instagram.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A search Instagram posts for #Epidural, #EpiduralAnalgesia, #ObAnesthesiologist and #ObstetricAnesthesia was conducted. Engagement metrics were used to quantify post content reach. Medical education videos were assessed for accuracy and PEMAT-A/V to evaluate understandability and actionability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 80 Instagram posts were analyzed, revealing a predominant focus on Medical Education(46%), followed by Provider Lifestyle(21%), Advertisement(16%), Research Articles(8%), Patient Experience(5%), and Medical Illustration(4%). In medical education content, 69% of posts were completely accurate, 28% were partially accurate or potentially misleading, and 3% were entirely inaccurate. When comparing video posts to picture posts: among video posts, 50% accurate information, 42% partially accurate or incomplete information, and 7% were entirely inaccurate. In contrast, picture posts demonstrated higher accuracy rates, with 81% being accurate, 19% partially accurate or potentially misleading, and none being inaccurate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our analysis illustrates diverse obstetric anesthesia-related content on Instagram. Future research should assess accuracy variations among different obstetric healthcare provider types on social media and provide strategies for healthcare providers to improve engagement, maintain accuracy, and navigate time constraints when sharing medical information.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"116 4","pages":"Page 416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Accuracy of Obstetric-Related Educational Material Disseminated Through Social Media\",\"authors\":\"Ogechukwu S. Anwaegbu BS,&nbsp;Smiti Gandhi BS,&nbsp;Gengi E. Kleto BS,&nbsp;Mitaire Erhieyovew BS,&nbsp;Deniz Isikkent MD,&nbsp;Rovnat Babazade MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnma.2024.07.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In recent times, healthcare providers have leveraged Instagram to share insights into their medical specialty, providing educational content to the public in a format distinct from traditional medical norms. However, the medical domain on Instagram lacks the same level of regulation, potentially resulting in the dissemination of inaccurate information3, impacting patient experiences and health outcomes. Our study aims to evaluate the quality and accuracy of obstetric anesthesia-related content on Instagram.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A search Instagram posts for #Epidural, #EpiduralAnalgesia, #ObAnesthesiologist and #ObstetricAnesthesia was conducted. Engagement metrics were used to quantify post content reach. Medical education videos were assessed for accuracy and PEMAT-A/V to evaluate understandability and actionability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 80 Instagram posts were analyzed, revealing a predominant focus on Medical Education(46%), followed by Provider Lifestyle(21%), Advertisement(16%), Research Articles(8%), Patient Experience(5%), and Medical Illustration(4%). In medical education content, 69% of posts were completely accurate, 28% were partially accurate or potentially misleading, and 3% were entirely inaccurate. When comparing video posts to picture posts: among video posts, 50% accurate information, 42% partially accurate or incomplete information, and 7% were entirely inaccurate. In contrast, picture posts demonstrated higher accuracy rates, with 81% being accurate, 19% partially accurate or potentially misleading, and none being inaccurate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our analysis illustrates diverse obstetric anesthesia-related content on Instagram. Future research should assess accuracy variations among different obstetric healthcare provider types on social media and provide strategies for healthcare providers to improve engagement, maintain accuracy, and navigate time constraints when sharing medical information.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"116 4\",\"pages\":\"Page 416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968424000968\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0027968424000968","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言近来,医疗服务提供者利用 Instagram 分享对其医疗专业的见解,以有别于传统医疗规范的形式向公众提供教育内容。然而,Instagram 上的医疗领域缺乏同等程度的监管,可能导致不准确信息的传播3 ,影响患者的体验和健康结果。我们的研究旨在评估 Instagram 上产科麻醉相关内容的质量和准确性。方法在 Instagram 上搜索 #Epidural、#EpiduralAnalgesia、#ObAnesthesiologist 和 #ObstetricAnesthesia 的帖子。参与度指标用于量化帖子内容的到达率。对医学教育视频的准确性进行了评估,并使用 PEMAT-A/V 评估了可理解性和可操作性。结果共分析了 80 篇 Instagram 帖子,结果显示,医疗教育内容占主导地位(46%),其次是医护人员生活方式(21%)、广告(16%)、研究文章(8%)、患者体验(5%)和医学插图(4%)。在医学教育内容中,69%的帖子完全准确,28%的帖子部分准确或可能存在误导,3%的帖子完全不准确。将视频帖子与图片帖子进行比较:在视频帖子中,50%的信息准确,42%的信息部分准确或不完整,7%的信息完全不准确。相比之下,图片帖子的准确率更高,81%准确,19%部分准确或有潜在误导性,无一不准确。未来的研究应评估社交媒体上不同产科医疗服务提供者类型的准确性差异,并为医疗服务提供者提供策略,以提高参与度、保持准确性并在分享医疗信息时应对时间限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the Accuracy of Obstetric-Related Educational Material Disseminated Through Social Media

Introduction

In recent times, healthcare providers have leveraged Instagram to share insights into their medical specialty, providing educational content to the public in a format distinct from traditional medical norms. However, the medical domain on Instagram lacks the same level of regulation, potentially resulting in the dissemination of inaccurate information3, impacting patient experiences and health outcomes. Our study aims to evaluate the quality and accuracy of obstetric anesthesia-related content on Instagram.

Methods

A search Instagram posts for #Epidural, #EpiduralAnalgesia, #ObAnesthesiologist and #ObstetricAnesthesia was conducted. Engagement metrics were used to quantify post content reach. Medical education videos were assessed for accuracy and PEMAT-A/V to evaluate understandability and actionability.

Results

A total of 80 Instagram posts were analyzed, revealing a predominant focus on Medical Education(46%), followed by Provider Lifestyle(21%), Advertisement(16%), Research Articles(8%), Patient Experience(5%), and Medical Illustration(4%). In medical education content, 69% of posts were completely accurate, 28% were partially accurate or potentially misleading, and 3% were entirely inaccurate. When comparing video posts to picture posts: among video posts, 50% accurate information, 42% partially accurate or incomplete information, and 7% were entirely inaccurate. In contrast, picture posts demonstrated higher accuracy rates, with 81% being accurate, 19% partially accurate or potentially misleading, and none being inaccurate.

Conclusion

Our analysis illustrates diverse obstetric anesthesia-related content on Instagram. Future research should assess accuracy variations among different obstetric healthcare provider types on social media and provide strategies for healthcare providers to improve engagement, maintain accuracy, and navigate time constraints when sharing medical information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
139
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent. The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.
期刊最新文献
Sickle cell disease: Contributing factors and radiological assessments Sialadenitis of the anterior mandibular vestibule: A subset of burning mouth syndrome A review of the risks and relationships between oral health and chronic diseases A cross sectional analysis of residents by race/ethnicity and specialty from 2020-2023 The association between heart failure and systemic inflammatory response index: A cross‐sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1