接受和未接受体外膜氧合治疗的 COVID-19 重症患者的超声心动图结果。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.007
Diana Morales Castro, Bruno L Ferreyro, David McAlpine, Nikolaos Evangelatos, Laura Dragoi, Ricardo Teijeiro-Paradis, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Eddy Fan, Ghislaine Douflé
{"title":"接受和未接受体外膜氧合治疗的 COVID-19 重症患者的超声心动图结果。","authors":"Diana Morales Castro, Bruno L Ferreyro, David McAlpine, Nikolaos Evangelatos, Laura Dragoi, Ricardo Teijeiro-Paradis, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Eddy Fan, Ghislaine Douflé","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe echocardiographic findings among mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome, comparing those with and without venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) support.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Intensive care unit (ICU) of a quaternary academic center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with COVID-19 admitted between March 2020 and June 2021 receiving mechanical ventilation, with an echocardiogram within 72 hours of admission.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Admission and follow-up echocardiograms during ICU stay.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Patient characteristics and echocardiographic findings were analyzed. Mortality odds ratio (OR) for right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction and acute cor pulmonale (ACP) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Among 242 patients, 145 (60%) received VV ECMO. Median (IQR) PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> was 76 (65-95) and 98 (85-140) in ECMO and non-ECMO patients, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). Initial echocardiograms showed no significant differences in left ventricular systolic dysfunction (10% v 15 %, p = 0.31) and RV systolic dysfunction (38% v. 27%, p = 0.27) between ECMO and non-ECMO patients. ACP was more frequent in the ECMO group at baseline (41% v. 26 %, p = 0.02). During the ICU stay, patients on ECMO exhibited a higher prevalence of RV systolic dysfunction (55% v 34%, p = 0.001) and ACP (51% v 26%, p = 0.002). RV systolic dysfunction (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.09-3.63) and ACP (OR 2.95; 95% CI 1.55-5.62) on the follow-up echocardiograms were associated with higher odds of ICU mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of echocardiographic abnormalities, in particular RV dysfunction, was frequent among patients with COVID-19 receiving VV ECMO support and was associated with worse clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Echocardiographic Findings in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Treated With and Without Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.\",\"authors\":\"Diana Morales Castro, Bruno L Ferreyro, David McAlpine, Nikolaos Evangelatos, Laura Dragoi, Ricardo Teijeiro-Paradis, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Eddy Fan, Ghislaine Douflé\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe echocardiographic findings among mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome, comparing those with and without venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) support.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Intensive care unit (ICU) of a quaternary academic center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with COVID-19 admitted between March 2020 and June 2021 receiving mechanical ventilation, with an echocardiogram within 72 hours of admission.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Admission and follow-up echocardiograms during ICU stay.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Patient characteristics and echocardiographic findings were analyzed. Mortality odds ratio (OR) for right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction and acute cor pulmonale (ACP) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Among 242 patients, 145 (60%) received VV ECMO. Median (IQR) PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> was 76 (65-95) and 98 (85-140) in ECMO and non-ECMO patients, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). Initial echocardiograms showed no significant differences in left ventricular systolic dysfunction (10% v 15 %, p = 0.31) and RV systolic dysfunction (38% v. 27%, p = 0.27) between ECMO and non-ECMO patients. ACP was more frequent in the ECMO group at baseline (41% v. 26 %, p = 0.02). During the ICU stay, patients on ECMO exhibited a higher prevalence of RV systolic dysfunction (55% v 34%, p = 0.001) and ACP (51% v 26%, p = 0.002). RV systolic dysfunction (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.09-3.63) and ACP (OR 2.95; 95% CI 1.55-5.62) on the follow-up echocardiograms were associated with higher odds of ICU mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of echocardiographic abnormalities, in particular RV dysfunction, was frequent among patients with COVID-19 receiving VV ECMO support and was associated with worse clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气患者的超声心动图结果:描述COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气患者的超声心动图检查结果,比较有静脉体外膜氧合(VV ECMO)支持和没有静脉体外膜氧合支持的患者:单中心、回顾性队列研究:地点:一家四级学术中心的重症监护室(ICU):2020年3月至2021年6月期间入院接受机械通气的COVID-19患者,入院72小时内接受超声心动图检查:入院和入住重症监护室期间的随访超声心动图:测量:分析患者特征和超声心动图结果。主要结果:242 名患者中,145 人(145 例)因右心室收缩功能障碍和急性肺心病(ACP)而死亡:在 242 名患者中,145 人(60%)接受了 VV ECMO。ECMO 和非 ECMO 患者的 PaO2/FiO2 中位数(IQR)分别为 76(65-95)和 98(85-140)(p ≤ 0.001)。初始超声心动图显示,ECMO 和非 ECMO 患者的左心室收缩功能障碍(10% 对 15%,P = 0.31)和 RV 收缩功能障碍(38% 对 27%,P = 0.27)无明显差异。基线时,ECMO 组的 ACP 发生率更高(41% 对 26%,P = 0.02)。在重症监护室住院期间,ECMO 患者出现 RV 收缩功能障碍(55% 对 34%,p = 0.001)和 ACP(51% 对 26%,p = 0.002)的比例更高。随访超声心动图显示,RV收缩功能障碍(OR 1.99;95% CI 1.09-3.63)和ACP(OR 2.95;95% CI 1.55-5.62)与ICU死亡率较高相关:结论:在接受 VV ECMO 支持的 COVID-19 患者中,超声心动图异常,尤其是 RV 功能障碍的发生率很高,并且与较差的临床预后有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Echocardiographic Findings in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Treated With and Without Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Objectives: To describe echocardiographic findings among mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome, comparing those with and without venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) support.

Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Intensive care unit (ICU) of a quaternary academic center.

Participants: Patients with COVID-19 admitted between March 2020 and June 2021 receiving mechanical ventilation, with an echocardiogram within 72 hours of admission.

Interventions: Admission and follow-up echocardiograms during ICU stay.

Measurements: Patient characteristics and echocardiographic findings were analyzed. Mortality odds ratio (OR) for right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction and acute cor pulmonale (ACP) was calculated.

Main results: Among 242 patients, 145 (60%) received VV ECMO. Median (IQR) PaO2/FiO2 was 76 (65-95) and 98 (85-140) in ECMO and non-ECMO patients, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). Initial echocardiograms showed no significant differences in left ventricular systolic dysfunction (10% v 15 %, p = 0.31) and RV systolic dysfunction (38% v. 27%, p = 0.27) between ECMO and non-ECMO patients. ACP was more frequent in the ECMO group at baseline (41% v. 26 %, p = 0.02). During the ICU stay, patients on ECMO exhibited a higher prevalence of RV systolic dysfunction (55% v 34%, p = 0.001) and ACP (51% v 26%, p = 0.002). RV systolic dysfunction (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.09-3.63) and ACP (OR 2.95; 95% CI 1.55-5.62) on the follow-up echocardiograms were associated with higher odds of ICU mortality.

Conclusions: The prevalence of echocardiographic abnormalities, in particular RV dysfunction, was frequent among patients with COVID-19 receiving VV ECMO support and was associated with worse clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
期刊最新文献
Masthead Contents Editorial Board 41st Symposium in Barbados brochure Articles to Appear in Future Issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1