儿科初级保健中检测高体重指数关注度的电子表型算法的外部验证。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787975
Anya G Barron, Ada M Fenick, Kaitlin R Maciejewski, Christy B Turer, Mona Sharifi
{"title":"儿科初级保健中检测高体重指数关注度的电子表型算法的外部验证。","authors":"Anya G Barron, Ada M Fenick, Kaitlin R Maciejewski, Christy B Turer, Mona Sharifi","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong> The lack of feasible and meaningful measures of clinicians' behavior hinders efforts to assess and improve obesity management in pediatric primary care. In this study, we examined the external validity of a novel algorithm, previously validated in a single geographic region, using structured electronic health record (EHR) data to identify phenotypes of clinicians' attention to elevated body mass index (BMI) and weight-related comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We extracted structured EHR data for 300 randomly selected 6- to 12-year-old children with elevated BMI seen for well-child visits from June 2018 to May 2019 at pediatric primary care practices affiliated with Yale. Using diagnosis codes, laboratory orders, referrals, and medications adapted from the original algorithm, we categorized encounters as having evidence of attention to BMI only, weight-related comorbidities only, or both BMI and comorbidities. We evaluated the algorithm's sensitivity and specificity for detecting any attention to BMI and/or comorbidities using chart review as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The adapted algorithm yielded a sensitivity of 79.2% and specificity of 94.0% for identifying any attention to high BMI/comorbidities in clinical documentation. Of 86 encounters labeled as \"no attention\" by the algorithm, 83% had evidence of attention in free-text components of the progress note. The likelihood of classification as \"any attention\" by both chart review and the algorithm varied by BMI category and by clinician type (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The electronic phenotyping algorithm had high specificity for detecting attention to high BMI and/or comorbidities in structured EHR inputs. The algorithm's performance may be improved by incorporating unstructured data from clinical notes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11387092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Validation of an Electronic Phenotyping Algorithm Detecting Attention to High Body Mass Index in Pediatric Primary Care.\",\"authors\":\"Anya G Barron, Ada M Fenick, Kaitlin R Maciejewski, Christy B Turer, Mona Sharifi\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1787975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong> The lack of feasible and meaningful measures of clinicians' behavior hinders efforts to assess and improve obesity management in pediatric primary care. In this study, we examined the external validity of a novel algorithm, previously validated in a single geographic region, using structured electronic health record (EHR) data to identify phenotypes of clinicians' attention to elevated body mass index (BMI) and weight-related comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We extracted structured EHR data for 300 randomly selected 6- to 12-year-old children with elevated BMI seen for well-child visits from June 2018 to May 2019 at pediatric primary care practices affiliated with Yale. Using diagnosis codes, laboratory orders, referrals, and medications adapted from the original algorithm, we categorized encounters as having evidence of attention to BMI only, weight-related comorbidities only, or both BMI and comorbidities. We evaluated the algorithm's sensitivity and specificity for detecting any attention to BMI and/or comorbidities using chart review as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The adapted algorithm yielded a sensitivity of 79.2% and specificity of 94.0% for identifying any attention to high BMI/comorbidities in clinical documentation. Of 86 encounters labeled as \\\"no attention\\\" by the algorithm, 83% had evidence of attention in free-text components of the progress note. The likelihood of classification as \\\"any attention\\\" by both chart review and the algorithm varied by BMI category and by clinician type (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The electronic phenotyping algorithm had high specificity for detecting attention to high BMI and/or comorbidities in structured EHR inputs. The algorithm's performance may be improved by incorporating unstructured data from clinical notes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11387092/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787975\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于缺乏可行且有意义的临床医生行为衡量标准,评估和改善儿科初级保健中肥胖管理的工作受到了阻碍。在本研究中,我们利用结构化电子健康记录(EHR)数据,对一种新算法的外部有效性进行了检验,该算法之前在一个单一的地理区域进行过验证,用于识别临床医生关注体重指数(BMI)升高和体重相关合并症的表型:我们提取了 2018 年 6 月至 2019 年 5 月期间在耶鲁大学附属儿科初级保健诊所就诊的 300 名随机抽取的 6 至 12 岁 BMI 升高儿童的结构化电子病历数据。我们使用从原始算法改编而来的诊断代码、化验单、转诊单和药物,将就诊情况分为仅有关注 BMI 的证据、仅有关注体重相关合并症的证据或同时关注 BMI 和合并症的证据。我们以病历审查作为参考标准,评估了该算法在检测是否关注体重指数和/或合并症方面的灵敏度和特异性:调整后的算法在识别临床文件中是否关注高体重指数/合并症方面的灵敏度为 79.2%,特异度为 94.0%。在被该算法标记为 "未关注 "的 86 个病例中,83% 的病例在病程记录的自由文本部分有关注的证据。根据 BMI 类别和临床医生类型的不同,病历审查和算法将其归类为 "任何关注 "的可能性也不同(P 结语):电子表型算法在检测结构化电子病历输入中对高体重指数和/或合并症的关注方面具有很高的特异性。该算法的性能可通过纳入临床笔记中的非结构化数据得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
External Validation of an Electronic Phenotyping Algorithm Detecting Attention to High Body Mass Index in Pediatric Primary Care.

Objectives:  The lack of feasible and meaningful measures of clinicians' behavior hinders efforts to assess and improve obesity management in pediatric primary care. In this study, we examined the external validity of a novel algorithm, previously validated in a single geographic region, using structured electronic health record (EHR) data to identify phenotypes of clinicians' attention to elevated body mass index (BMI) and weight-related comorbidities.

Methods:  We extracted structured EHR data for 300 randomly selected 6- to 12-year-old children with elevated BMI seen for well-child visits from June 2018 to May 2019 at pediatric primary care practices affiliated with Yale. Using diagnosis codes, laboratory orders, referrals, and medications adapted from the original algorithm, we categorized encounters as having evidence of attention to BMI only, weight-related comorbidities only, or both BMI and comorbidities. We evaluated the algorithm's sensitivity and specificity for detecting any attention to BMI and/or comorbidities using chart review as the reference standard.

Results:  The adapted algorithm yielded a sensitivity of 79.2% and specificity of 94.0% for identifying any attention to high BMI/comorbidities in clinical documentation. Of 86 encounters labeled as "no attention" by the algorithm, 83% had evidence of attention in free-text components of the progress note. The likelihood of classification as "any attention" by both chart review and the algorithm varied by BMI category and by clinician type (p < 0.001).

Conclusion:  The electronic phenotyping algorithm had high specificity for detecting attention to high BMI and/or comorbidities in structured EHR inputs. The algorithm's performance may be improved by incorporating unstructured data from clinical notes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Taking a Team Approach: Keep up with the EHR with a Training and Optimization Program. Interventions to mitigate EHR and documentation burden in health professions trainees: A scoping review. A human-centered approach for designing a social care referral platform. Ethical dimensions of clinical data sharing by US healthcare organizations for purposes beyond direct patient care: Interviews with healthcare leaders. Special Issue on Informatics Education A Longitudinal Graduate Medical Education Curriculum in Clinical Informatics: Function, Structure, and Evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1