SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间儿科初级保健远程保健和诊室就诊的社会决定因素。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Academic Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2024.08.012
Jordee M Wells, Tyler Gorham, Skyler E Kalady, Deena J Chisolm
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间儿科初级保健远程保健和诊室就诊的社会决定因素。","authors":"Jordee M Wells, Tyler Gorham, Skyler E Kalady, Deena J Chisolm","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2024.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the use of primary care telehealth following rapid reduction of in-person pediatric primary care availability during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and how this varied by community-level social determinants and individual-level social needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children 0-17 years across 16 sites within Nationwide Children's Hospital Primary Care Network from March 22<sup>nd</sup>-July 31<sup>st</sup>, 2020, and a preceding comparator period (2019). The study population includes 107,629 patient encounters. We compared visit type (in-person vs. telehealth), demographics, presence of individual social needs, and community social determinants, using the Child Opportunity Index 2.0 (COI). To assess telehealth utilization, we compared the ratio of 2019 to 2020 primary care visits across levels of COI. We trained a linear regression model predicting the number of telehealth encounters in 2020 using individual patient characteristics and COI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in census tracts with high and very high levels of opportunity maintained the highest relative encounter volume (2020:2019) at the beginning of the pandemic (0.78 and 0.73, respectively, compared to 65% for children living in very low opportunity neighborhoods; p<0.001). Patients with caregiver-reported social needs (housing, transportation, utilities, food) had relatively greater telehealth use following the start of the public health emergency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Volume of primary care visits decreased least for high and very high opportunity neighborhoods yet individual social needs were associated with higher relative use of telemedicine. Findings suggest that telehealth was an important modality to deliver care to children with social needs but does not overcome community level barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Determinants Pediatric Primary Care Telehealth and In-Office Visits During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Jordee M Wells, Tyler Gorham, Skyler E Kalady, Deena J Chisolm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acap.2024.08.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the use of primary care telehealth following rapid reduction of in-person pediatric primary care availability during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and how this varied by community-level social determinants and individual-level social needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children 0-17 years across 16 sites within Nationwide Children's Hospital Primary Care Network from March 22<sup>nd</sup>-July 31<sup>st</sup>, 2020, and a preceding comparator period (2019). The study population includes 107,629 patient encounters. We compared visit type (in-person vs. telehealth), demographics, presence of individual social needs, and community social determinants, using the Child Opportunity Index 2.0 (COI). To assess telehealth utilization, we compared the ratio of 2019 to 2020 primary care visits across levels of COI. We trained a linear regression model predicting the number of telehealth encounters in 2020 using individual patient characteristics and COI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in census tracts with high and very high levels of opportunity maintained the highest relative encounter volume (2020:2019) at the beginning of the pandemic (0.78 and 0.73, respectively, compared to 65% for children living in very low opportunity neighborhoods; p<0.001). Patients with caregiver-reported social needs (housing, transportation, utilities, food) had relatively greater telehealth use following the start of the public health emergency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Volume of primary care visits decreased least for high and very high opportunity neighborhoods yet individual social needs were associated with higher relative use of telemedicine. Findings suggest that telehealth was an important modality to deliver care to children with social needs but does not overcome community level barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.08.012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.08.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的描述在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,儿科初级保健上门服务迅速减少后初级保健远程医疗的使用情况,以及社区层面的社会决定因素和个人层面的社会需求有何不同:我们在 2020 年 3 月 22 日至 7 月 31 日以及之前的参照期(2019 年)对全美儿童医院初级保健网络内 16 个站点的 0-17 岁儿童进行了一项回顾性队列研究。研究对象包括 107629 次就诊。我们使用儿童机会指数 2.0 (COI),比较了就诊类型(亲诊与远程医疗)、人口统计学、个人社会需求的存在以及社区社会决定因素。为了评估远程医疗的使用情况,我们比较了不同 COI 水平的 2019 年与 2020 年初级保健就诊率。我们利用患者个人特征和 COI 建立了一个线性回归模型,预测 2020 年远程医疗就诊次数:结果:在大流行开始时,机会度高和机会度非常高的人口普查区的患者保持了最高的相对就诊量(2020 年:2019 年)(分别为 0.78 和 0.73,而机会度非常低的社区儿童的就诊量为 65%;P 结论:在大流行开始时,机会度高和机会度非常高的人口普查区的患者保持了最高的相对就诊量(2020 年:2019 年):机会多和机会少的社区初级保健就诊量减少最少,但个人社会需求与远程医疗的相对使用率较高有关。研究结果表明,远程医疗是为有社会需求的儿童提供医疗服务的重要方式,但并不能克服社区层面的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Determinants Pediatric Primary Care Telehealth and In-Office Visits During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.

Objective: To describe the use of primary care telehealth following rapid reduction of in-person pediatric primary care availability during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and how this varied by community-level social determinants and individual-level social needs.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children 0-17 years across 16 sites within Nationwide Children's Hospital Primary Care Network from March 22nd-July 31st, 2020, and a preceding comparator period (2019). The study population includes 107,629 patient encounters. We compared visit type (in-person vs. telehealth), demographics, presence of individual social needs, and community social determinants, using the Child Opportunity Index 2.0 (COI). To assess telehealth utilization, we compared the ratio of 2019 to 2020 primary care visits across levels of COI. We trained a linear regression model predicting the number of telehealth encounters in 2020 using individual patient characteristics and COI.

Results: Patients in census tracts with high and very high levels of opportunity maintained the highest relative encounter volume (2020:2019) at the beginning of the pandemic (0.78 and 0.73, respectively, compared to 65% for children living in very low opportunity neighborhoods; p<0.001). Patients with caregiver-reported social needs (housing, transportation, utilities, food) had relatively greater telehealth use following the start of the public health emergency.

Conclusions: Volume of primary care visits decreased least for high and very high opportunity neighborhoods yet individual social needs were associated with higher relative use of telemedicine. Findings suggest that telehealth was an important modality to deliver care to children with social needs but does not overcome community level barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
期刊最新文献
Geographic patterns of youth suicide in San Diego County. Suicide Risk Identified among Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth in the Emergency Department (2019-2022). When Two Worlds Collide. Racial, Ethnic, and Language Inequities in Ambulatory Pediatrics Patient Family Experience. Social Behaviors Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Test Positivity Among Children Evaluated in Canadian Emergency Departments, 2020 to 2022: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1