口服新霉素用于耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌脱落的有效性和安全性:一项开放标签随机对照试验。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Antibiotics-Basel Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.3390/antibiotics13080781
Lalita Tancharoen, Ananya Srisomnuek, Surapee Tiengrim, Narisara Thamthaweechok, Teerawit Tangkorskul, Visanu Thamlikitkul
{"title":"口服新霉素用于耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌脱落的有效性和安全性:一项开放标签随机对照试验。","authors":"Lalita Tancharoen, Ananya Srisomnuek, Surapee Tiengrim, Narisara Thamthaweechok, Teerawit Tangkorskul, Visanu Thamlikitkul","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13080781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with carbapenem-resistant <i>Enterobacterales</i> (CRE) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are at risk for subsequent infections and transmission, necessitating contact precautions. Neomycin has shown in vitro activity against CRE in 66-85% of isolates. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neomycin for CRE decolonization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label randomized controlled trial, stool/rectal swab samples from high-risk patients were collected and tested for CRE colonization in the GI tract. Patients who had CRE and met eligible criteria were divided into a neomycin group (<i>n</i> = 26; treated with 4.2 g/day neomycin for 5 days) and a control group (<i>n</i> = 26). CRE detection in stool/rectal swabs was performed on days 7 ± 2 and 14 ± 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups' baseline characteristics were similar. CRE presence on day 7 ± 2 was significantly lower in the neomycin group (46.2%) than in the control group (80.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Efficacy of neomycin (4.2 g/day for 5 days) for CRE decolonization was 42.8-53.8% by day 7. By day 14 ± 2, the CRE rate in the neomycin group had risen to align with the control group's rate (73.1% vs. 61.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.56). The neomycin group experienced mild, temporary, gastrointestinal side-effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neomycin effectively reduced CRE colonization on day 7 ± 2, but its impact waned by day 14 ± 2. This suggests that neomycin dosage was too low and the duration of treatment was too short for lasting CRE decolonization.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11351571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Oral Neomycin for the Decolonization of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Enterobacterales</i>: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lalita Tancharoen, Ananya Srisomnuek, Surapee Tiengrim, Narisara Thamthaweechok, Teerawit Tangkorskul, Visanu Thamlikitkul\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics13080781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with carbapenem-resistant <i>Enterobacterales</i> (CRE) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are at risk for subsequent infections and transmission, necessitating contact precautions. Neomycin has shown in vitro activity against CRE in 66-85% of isolates. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neomycin for CRE decolonization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-label randomized controlled trial, stool/rectal swab samples from high-risk patients were collected and tested for CRE colonization in the GI tract. Patients who had CRE and met eligible criteria were divided into a neomycin group (<i>n</i> = 26; treated with 4.2 g/day neomycin for 5 days) and a control group (<i>n</i> = 26). CRE detection in stool/rectal swabs was performed on days 7 ± 2 and 14 ± 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups' baseline characteristics were similar. CRE presence on day 7 ± 2 was significantly lower in the neomycin group (46.2%) than in the control group (80.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Efficacy of neomycin (4.2 g/day for 5 days) for CRE decolonization was 42.8-53.8% by day 7. By day 14 ± 2, the CRE rate in the neomycin group had risen to align with the control group's rate (73.1% vs. 61.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.56). The neomycin group experienced mild, temporary, gastrointestinal side-effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neomycin effectively reduced CRE colonization on day 7 ± 2, but its impact waned by day 14 ± 2. This suggests that neomycin dosage was too low and the duration of treatment was too short for lasting CRE decolonization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11351571/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13080781\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13080781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胃肠道(GI)感染耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)的患者面临后续感染和传播的风险,因此有必要采取接触预防措施。新霉素对 66%-85% 分离出的 CRE 具有体外活性。本研究评估了新霉素用于 CRE 去菌的有效性和安全性:在这项开放标签随机对照试验中,收集了高危患者的粪便/直肠拭子样本,并对其消化道内的 CRE 定植情况进行了检测。患有 CRE 且符合条件的患者被分为新霉素组(n = 26;每天服用 4.2 克新霉素,连续 5 天)和对照组(n = 26)。在第 7±2 天和第 14±2 天对粪便/直肠拭子中的 CRE 进行检测:结果:两组的基线特征相似。结果:两组基线特征相似,第 7±2 天新霉素组(46.2%)的 CRE 感染率明显低于对照组(80.8%,P = 0.01)。到第 7 天,新霉素(每天 4.2 克,共 5 天)对 CRE 的去菌效果为 42.8%-53.8%。到第 14±2 天,新霉素组的 CRE 感染率上升到与对照组一致(73.1% 对 61.5%,p = 0.56)。新霉素组出现了轻微的暂时性胃肠道副作用:结论:新霉素在第 7±2 天有效降低了 CRE 的定植率,但其影响在第 14±2 天减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Neomycin for the Decolonization of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are at risk for subsequent infections and transmission, necessitating contact precautions. Neomycin has shown in vitro activity against CRE in 66-85% of isolates. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of neomycin for CRE decolonization.

Methods: In this open-label randomized controlled trial, stool/rectal swab samples from high-risk patients were collected and tested for CRE colonization in the GI tract. Patients who had CRE and met eligible criteria were divided into a neomycin group (n = 26; treated with 4.2 g/day neomycin for 5 days) and a control group (n = 26). CRE detection in stool/rectal swabs was performed on days 7 ± 2 and 14 ± 2.

Results: The two groups' baseline characteristics were similar. CRE presence on day 7 ± 2 was significantly lower in the neomycin group (46.2%) than in the control group (80.8%, p = 0.01). Efficacy of neomycin (4.2 g/day for 5 days) for CRE decolonization was 42.8-53.8% by day 7. By day 14 ± 2, the CRE rate in the neomycin group had risen to align with the control group's rate (73.1% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.56). The neomycin group experienced mild, temporary, gastrointestinal side-effects.

Conclusions: Neomycin effectively reduced CRE colonization on day 7 ± 2, but its impact waned by day 14 ± 2. This suggests that neomycin dosage was too low and the duration of treatment was too short for lasting CRE decolonization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial Effects of Metal Coatings or Physical, Chemical Modifications of Titanium Dental Implant Surfaces for Prevention of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review of In Vivo Studies. Clarithromycin Modulates Neutrophilic Inflammation Induced by Prevotella intermedia in Human Airway Epithelial Cells. Commercial Silver-Based Dressings: In Vitro and Clinical Studies in Treatment of Chronic and Burn Wounds. Comparing the Outcomes of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Based and Non-Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Based Therapeutic Regimens in Patients with Multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections-A Meta-Analysis. Efficacy of Trichoderma spp. and Kosakonia sp. Both Independently and Combined with Fungicides against Botrytis cinerea on Strawberries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1