{"title":"2 型糖尿病患者的血脂谱表型:心血管健康研究的风险关联和结果","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To determine whether discrete lipid profiles (refer to as lipid phenotyping) can be used to stratify cardiovascular risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and results</h3><p>Cardiovascular Health Study participants with diabetes and fasting lipid profiles at baseline (<em>n</em> = 866) were categorized separately by level of LDL cholesterol and HDL-C/Triglyceride (Tg) profiles (low Tg/high HDL-C; high Tg/low HDL-C; high Tg only or low HDL-C only). We performed Cox multivariate regression analysis to assess the risk of CVD mortality, incident myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), stroke, and composite MACE (MI, HF, stroke, and CVD mortality) associated with each lipid category. We also calculated risk estimates for MACE using lipid measures as continuous variables. In the fully adjusted model, the high triglyceride plus low HDL-C cholesterol phenotype demonstrated risk that was at least as high as the highest LDL-C sub-group phenotype for CVD mortality (Hazard ratio {HR} 1.58 vs 1.48), MI (HR 1.53 vs 1.58), HF (HR 1.47 vs 1.20), stroke (HR 2.02 vs 1.43), and MACE (HR 1.58 vs 1.38). When modeled continuously, the HR per SD for MACE was 1.12 (<em>p</em> = 0.03) for LDL-C and 1.19–1.20 (<em>p</em> < 0.001) for triglycerides or remnant cholesterol.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Participants with the high triglyceride/low HDL-C phenotype had equivalent or higher CVD risk than those with the high LDL-C phenotype. Further studies are necessary to determine whether lipid phenotyping accounts for the substantial CVD risk not explained by LDL cholesterol among individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666772400093X/pdfft?md5=34ecc037be6eeb164d07124684c133f3&pid=1-s2.0-S266666772400093X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenotyping lipid profiles in type 2 diabetes: Risk association and outcomes from the Cardiovascular Health Study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To determine whether discrete lipid profiles (refer to as lipid phenotyping) can be used to stratify cardiovascular risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and results</h3><p>Cardiovascular Health Study participants with diabetes and fasting lipid profiles at baseline (<em>n</em> = 866) were categorized separately by level of LDL cholesterol and HDL-C/Triglyceride (Tg) profiles (low Tg/high HDL-C; high Tg/low HDL-C; high Tg only or low HDL-C only). We performed Cox multivariate regression analysis to assess the risk of CVD mortality, incident myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), stroke, and composite MACE (MI, HF, stroke, and CVD mortality) associated with each lipid category. We also calculated risk estimates for MACE using lipid measures as continuous variables. In the fully adjusted model, the high triglyceride plus low HDL-C cholesterol phenotype demonstrated risk that was at least as high as the highest LDL-C sub-group phenotype for CVD mortality (Hazard ratio {HR} 1.58 vs 1.48), MI (HR 1.53 vs 1.58), HF (HR 1.47 vs 1.20), stroke (HR 2.02 vs 1.43), and MACE (HR 1.58 vs 1.38). When modeled continuously, the HR per SD for MACE was 1.12 (<em>p</em> = 0.03) for LDL-C and 1.19–1.20 (<em>p</em> < 0.001) for triglycerides or remnant cholesterol.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Participants with the high triglyceride/low HDL-C phenotype had equivalent or higher CVD risk than those with the high LDL-C phenotype. Further studies are necessary to determine whether lipid phenotyping accounts for the substantial CVD risk not explained by LDL cholesterol among individuals with type 2 diabetes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666772400093X/pdfft?md5=34ecc037be6eeb164d07124684c133f3&pid=1-s2.0-S266666772400093X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666772400093X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666772400093X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
方法和结果心血管健康研究参与者中,有糖尿病且基线时有空腹血脂图谱者(n = 866),按低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇/甘油三酯 (Tg) 图谱水平(低 Tg/ 高密度脂蛋白胆固醇;高 Tg/ 低密度脂蛋白胆固醇;仅高 Tg 或仅低密度脂蛋白胆固醇)分别进行分类。我们进行了 Cox 多变量回归分析,以评估与每种血脂类别相关的心血管疾病死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)事件、心力衰竭(HF)、中风和复合 MACE(MI、HF、中风和心血管疾病死亡率)的风险。我们还将血脂指标作为连续变量计算了MACE的风险估计值。在完全调整模型中,在心血管疾病死亡率(危险比{HR} 1.58 vs 1.48)、心肌梗死(HR 1.53 vs 1.58)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HR 1.47 vs 1.20)、中风(HR 2.02 vs 1.43)和 MACE(HR 1.58 vs 1.38)方面,高甘油三酯加低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇表型的风险至少与最高低密度脂蛋白胆固醇亚组表型一样高。结论高甘油三酯/低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇表型的参与者与高低密度脂蛋白胆固醇表型的参与者相比,具有同等或更高的心血管疾病风险。有必要开展进一步研究,以确定血脂表型是否解释了 2 型糖尿病患者中低密度脂蛋白胆固醇无法解释的巨大心血管疾病风险。
Phenotyping lipid profiles in type 2 diabetes: Risk association and outcomes from the Cardiovascular Health Study
Aims
To determine whether discrete lipid profiles (refer to as lipid phenotyping) can be used to stratify cardiovascular risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Methods and results
Cardiovascular Health Study participants with diabetes and fasting lipid profiles at baseline (n = 866) were categorized separately by level of LDL cholesterol and HDL-C/Triglyceride (Tg) profiles (low Tg/high HDL-C; high Tg/low HDL-C; high Tg only or low HDL-C only). We performed Cox multivariate regression analysis to assess the risk of CVD mortality, incident myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), stroke, and composite MACE (MI, HF, stroke, and CVD mortality) associated with each lipid category. We also calculated risk estimates for MACE using lipid measures as continuous variables. In the fully adjusted model, the high triglyceride plus low HDL-C cholesterol phenotype demonstrated risk that was at least as high as the highest LDL-C sub-group phenotype for CVD mortality (Hazard ratio {HR} 1.58 vs 1.48), MI (HR 1.53 vs 1.58), HF (HR 1.47 vs 1.20), stroke (HR 2.02 vs 1.43), and MACE (HR 1.58 vs 1.38). When modeled continuously, the HR per SD for MACE was 1.12 (p = 0.03) for LDL-C and 1.19–1.20 (p < 0.001) for triglycerides or remnant cholesterol.
Conclusions
Participants with the high triglyceride/low HDL-C phenotype had equivalent or higher CVD risk than those with the high LDL-C phenotype. Further studies are necessary to determine whether lipid phenotyping accounts for the substantial CVD risk not explained by LDL cholesterol among individuals with type 2 diabetes.