Wen-Jing Yin , Wu Mao , Fang Yang , Meng-Yao Wang , Jin-Quan Liu , Dong-Ping Chen , Li-Ping Zhou , Si-Da Chen , Xi-Zhen Jiang , Yu-Meng Ou , Zheng Wu , Bin Qi
{"title":"强度调制放射治疗 847 例鼻咽癌的效果分析:经验与建议","authors":"Wen-Jing Yin , Wu Mao , Fang Yang , Meng-Yao Wang , Jin-Quan Liu , Dong-Ping Chen , Li-Ping Zhou , Si-Da Chen , Xi-Zhen Jiang , Yu-Meng Ou , Zheng Wu , Bin Qi","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To identify the failure patterns and prognostic factors of nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data on 847 patients with newly diagnosed, non-disseminated NPC treated by IMRT between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Survival outcome, failure patterns and prognosis factors were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 5-year local relapse-free survival, nodal relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 94.3%, 95.3%, 84.8%, 76.5% and 85.7%, respectively. The major local recurrence sites were the nasopharynx (91.5%, 43/47) and skull base (68.1%, 32/47); 39 patients had in-field failures, four had marginal failures, and four had out-field failures. Level IIb (62.2%, 23/37) was the most frequent regional recurrence site, followed by IIa (35.1%, 13/37) and retropharyngeal region (32.4%, 12/37); 35 cases had in-field failure alone, one had out-field failure alone, and one had both in- and out-field failure. TNM stage was the most significant factor for prognosis prediction. 402 (47.5%) patients had acute adverse events of grade 3 or 4; leukopenia (31.5%) and mucositis (26.7%) was the most common hematological and non-hematological event, respectively. Late complications were slight or moderate damages; xerostomia (647/847, 76.4%) and hearing impairment (422/847, 49.8%) remained the most troublesome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>NPC patients treated with IMRT obtained satisfactory survival outcomes. The key failure pattern was distant metastasis. The main pattern of local–regional failure was in-field failure. Screening high risk patients with distant metastases and optimizing radiotherapy targets should be studied.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19716,"journal":{"name":"Oral oncology","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 107001"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect analysis of 847 nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases treated with intensity modulated radiation: Experience and suggestions\",\"authors\":\"Wen-Jing Yin , Wu Mao , Fang Yang , Meng-Yao Wang , Jin-Quan Liu , Dong-Ping Chen , Li-Ping Zhou , Si-Da Chen , Xi-Zhen Jiang , Yu-Meng Ou , Zheng Wu , Bin Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To identify the failure patterns and prognostic factors of nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data on 847 patients with newly diagnosed, non-disseminated NPC treated by IMRT between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Survival outcome, failure patterns and prognosis factors were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 5-year local relapse-free survival, nodal relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 94.3%, 95.3%, 84.8%, 76.5% and 85.7%, respectively. The major local recurrence sites were the nasopharynx (91.5%, 43/47) and skull base (68.1%, 32/47); 39 patients had in-field failures, four had marginal failures, and four had out-field failures. Level IIb (62.2%, 23/37) was the most frequent regional recurrence site, followed by IIa (35.1%, 13/37) and retropharyngeal region (32.4%, 12/37); 35 cases had in-field failure alone, one had out-field failure alone, and one had both in- and out-field failure. TNM stage was the most significant factor for prognosis prediction. 402 (47.5%) patients had acute adverse events of grade 3 or 4; leukopenia (31.5%) and mucositis (26.7%) was the most common hematological and non-hematological event, respectively. Late complications were slight or moderate damages; xerostomia (647/847, 76.4%) and hearing impairment (422/847, 49.8%) remained the most troublesome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>NPC patients treated with IMRT obtained satisfactory survival outcomes. The key failure pattern was distant metastasis. The main pattern of local–regional failure was in-field failure. Screening high risk patients with distant metastases and optimizing radiotherapy targets should be studied.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral oncology\",\"volume\":\"158 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107001\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837524003191\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1368837524003191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect analysis of 847 nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases treated with intensity modulated radiation: Experience and suggestions
Objectives
To identify the failure patterns and prognostic factors of nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era.
Methods
Data on 847 patients with newly diagnosed, non-disseminated NPC treated by IMRT between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Survival outcome, failure patterns and prognosis factors were analyzed.
Results
The 5-year local relapse-free survival, nodal relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 94.3%, 95.3%, 84.8%, 76.5% and 85.7%, respectively. The major local recurrence sites were the nasopharynx (91.5%, 43/47) and skull base (68.1%, 32/47); 39 patients had in-field failures, four had marginal failures, and four had out-field failures. Level IIb (62.2%, 23/37) was the most frequent regional recurrence site, followed by IIa (35.1%, 13/37) and retropharyngeal region (32.4%, 12/37); 35 cases had in-field failure alone, one had out-field failure alone, and one had both in- and out-field failure. TNM stage was the most significant factor for prognosis prediction. 402 (47.5%) patients had acute adverse events of grade 3 or 4; leukopenia (31.5%) and mucositis (26.7%) was the most common hematological and non-hematological event, respectively. Late complications were slight or moderate damages; xerostomia (647/847, 76.4%) and hearing impairment (422/847, 49.8%) remained the most troublesome.
Conclusion
NPC patients treated with IMRT obtained satisfactory survival outcomes. The key failure pattern was distant metastasis. The main pattern of local–regional failure was in-field failure. Screening high risk patients with distant metastases and optimizing radiotherapy targets should be studied.
期刊介绍:
Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck.
Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo-facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields.