基于智能手机应用程序的失眠和睡眠障碍干预措施的有效性:随机对照试验荟萃分析

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1016/j.sleep.2024.08.025
Jake Linardon , Cleo Anderson , Zoe McClure , Claudia Liu , Mariel Messer
{"title":"基于智能手机应用程序的失眠和睡眠障碍干预措施的有效性:随机对照试验荟萃分析","authors":"Jake Linardon ,&nbsp;Cleo Anderson ,&nbsp;Zoe McClure ,&nbsp;Claudia Liu ,&nbsp;Mariel Messer","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2024.08.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is growing enthusiasm towards the role of smartphone app-based interventions in the management of insomnia and related sleep problems. A considerable number of apps designed to address insomnia have been developed in recent years, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have begun to explore their efficacy. We conducted a meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of apps for insomnia and sleep disturbances. From 19 RCTs, we identified significant pooled effect sizes for the primary outcomes of self-reported insomnia (g = 0.60; 05 % CI = 0.44, 0.76; NNT = 4.8) and sleep disturbances (g = 0.70; 95 % CI = 0.58, 0.83; NNT = 4.1) in favour of apps over control conditions. These effects remained robust when restricting the analyses to trials that delivered a placebo control, received a lower risk of bias rating, and had a larger sample size. Significant pooled effects in favour of apps were also observed for secondary outcomes of night time awakenings (g = 0.56), total sleep time (g = 0.33), and sleep onset latency (g = 0.32), but non-significant effects emerged for daytime sleepiness, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, sleep efficiency, sleep hygiene, and wake after sleep onset. The pooled dropout rate from app conditions was 13.1 % (95 % CI = 8.3, 20.0), which was significantly higher than control conditions (OR = 1.78, 95 % CI = 1.39, 2.28). Findings suggest that stand-alone app-based interventions can effectively address insomnia and sleep disturbances, and may play an important role in the management of these symptoms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":"122 ","pages":"Pages 237-244"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945724003964/pdfft?md5=c80f0213e784c4cc062c88ded44cbf89&pid=1-s2.0-S1389945724003964-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of smartphone app-based interventions for insomnia and sleep disturbances: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Jake Linardon ,&nbsp;Cleo Anderson ,&nbsp;Zoe McClure ,&nbsp;Claudia Liu ,&nbsp;Mariel Messer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sleep.2024.08.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is growing enthusiasm towards the role of smartphone app-based interventions in the management of insomnia and related sleep problems. A considerable number of apps designed to address insomnia have been developed in recent years, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have begun to explore their efficacy. We conducted a meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of apps for insomnia and sleep disturbances. From 19 RCTs, we identified significant pooled effect sizes for the primary outcomes of self-reported insomnia (g = 0.60; 05 % CI = 0.44, 0.76; NNT = 4.8) and sleep disturbances (g = 0.70; 95 % CI = 0.58, 0.83; NNT = 4.1) in favour of apps over control conditions. These effects remained robust when restricting the analyses to trials that delivered a placebo control, received a lower risk of bias rating, and had a larger sample size. Significant pooled effects in favour of apps were also observed for secondary outcomes of night time awakenings (g = 0.56), total sleep time (g = 0.33), and sleep onset latency (g = 0.32), but non-significant effects emerged for daytime sleepiness, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, sleep efficiency, sleep hygiene, and wake after sleep onset. The pooled dropout rate from app conditions was 13.1 % (95 % CI = 8.3, 20.0), which was significantly higher than control conditions (OR = 1.78, 95 % CI = 1.39, 2.28). Findings suggest that stand-alone app-based interventions can effectively address insomnia and sleep disturbances, and may play an important role in the management of these symptoms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep medicine\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 237-244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945724003964/pdfft?md5=c80f0213e784c4cc062c88ded44cbf89&pid=1-s2.0-S1389945724003964-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945724003964\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945724003964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的人热衷于利用智能手机应用程序干预失眠及相关睡眠问题。近年来,大量旨在解决失眠问题的应用程序应运而生,随机对照试验(RCT)也已开始探索其有效性。我们对治疗失眠和睡眠障碍的应用程序的有效性进行了荟萃分析。从 19 项 RCT 中,我们确定了自我报告失眠(g = 0.60; 05 % CI = 0.44, 0.76; NNT = 4.8)和睡眠障碍(g = 0.70; 95 % CI = 0.58, 0.83; NNT = 4.1)这两项主要结果的显著集合效应大小,结果显示应用程序优于对照条件。如果将分析范围限制在提供安慰剂对照、偏倚风险评级较低、样本量较大的试验中,这些效应仍将保持稳定。在夜间觉醒(g = 0.56)、总睡眠时间(g = 0.33)和睡眠开始潜伏期(g = 0.32)等次要结果中也观察到了有利于应用程序的显著集合效应,但在白天嗜睡、睡眠功能紊乱、睡眠效率、睡眠卫生和睡眠开始后觉醒等方面出现了非显著效应。应用条件的总辍学率为 13.1%(95 % CI = 8.3,20.0),明显高于对照条件(OR = 1.78,95 % CI = 1.39,2.28)。研究结果表明,基于应用程序的独立干预措施可有效解决失眠和睡眠障碍问题,并可能在这些症状的管理中发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effectiveness of smartphone app-based interventions for insomnia and sleep disturbances: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

There is growing enthusiasm towards the role of smartphone app-based interventions in the management of insomnia and related sleep problems. A considerable number of apps designed to address insomnia have been developed in recent years, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have begun to explore their efficacy. We conducted a meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of apps for insomnia and sleep disturbances. From 19 RCTs, we identified significant pooled effect sizes for the primary outcomes of self-reported insomnia (g = 0.60; 05 % CI = 0.44, 0.76; NNT = 4.8) and sleep disturbances (g = 0.70; 95 % CI = 0.58, 0.83; NNT = 4.1) in favour of apps over control conditions. These effects remained robust when restricting the analyses to trials that delivered a placebo control, received a lower risk of bias rating, and had a larger sample size. Significant pooled effects in favour of apps were also observed for secondary outcomes of night time awakenings (g = 0.56), total sleep time (g = 0.33), and sleep onset latency (g = 0.32), but non-significant effects emerged for daytime sleepiness, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, sleep efficiency, sleep hygiene, and wake after sleep onset. The pooled dropout rate from app conditions was 13.1 % (95 % CI = 8.3, 20.0), which was significantly higher than control conditions (OR = 1.78, 95 % CI = 1.39, 2.28). Findings suggest that stand-alone app-based interventions can effectively address insomnia and sleep disturbances, and may play an important role in the management of these symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep medicine
Sleep medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1060
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without. A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry. The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.
期刊最新文献
Vigorous physical activity is associated with reduced sleep fragmentation in obstructive sleep apnea: A sex-specific analysis Efficacy of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia in Armed Forces and Veteran populations – A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Profile and predictors of subjective-objective sleep discrepancy in individuals with poor sleep quality Is “normal” ferritin truly enough? Strong correlation between iron stores and RLS severity in patients with normal ferritin levels A scoping review of digital psychosocial interventions for sleep disturbances in children with chronic health conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1