为了现金,为了地球,还是为了两者?评估减少能源消耗的信息干预措施

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114314
Florian Lange , Ranja Van Asbroeck , Dimitri Van Baelen , Siegfried Dewitte
{"title":"为了现金,为了地球,还是为了两者?评估减少能源消耗的信息干预措施","authors":"Florian Lange ,&nbsp;Ranja Van Asbroeck ,&nbsp;Dimitri Van Baelen ,&nbsp;Siegfried Dewitte","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reductions in residential energy demand (especially by high-consuming households) are critical for climate change mitigation. Interventions that inform people about their energy use and its consequences may encourage them to reduce energy consumption, but such informational interventions have not always been found to be effective. In addition, little is known about the factors that determine the effectiveness of informational interventions. Here, we examined the effect of an informational intervention campaign on household energy use (electricity and gas) in Mechelen, Belgium. Neighborhoods were randomized to different variants of the intervention that emphasized the monetary, environmental, or monetary and environmental consequences of saving energy. Across a three-year study period, we observed significantly larger reductions (two additional percentage points) in gas consumption in the intervention city than in four comparable control cities. This effect was largely driven by reductions in neighborhoods with high baseline levels of gas consumption. No substantial changes were found between neighborhoods that received monetary information, environmental information, or both. Our findings support the effectiveness of informational interventions for the reduction of energy use, point to the special role of high-consuming households, and can inform the design of future intervention campaigns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 114314"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003343/pdfft?md5=7b2c44cf820f4a4c43dda3026c938c04&pid=1-s2.0-S0301421524003343-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"For cash, the planet, or for both: Evaluating an informational intervention for energy consumption reduction\",\"authors\":\"Florian Lange ,&nbsp;Ranja Van Asbroeck ,&nbsp;Dimitri Van Baelen ,&nbsp;Siegfried Dewitte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Reductions in residential energy demand (especially by high-consuming households) are critical for climate change mitigation. Interventions that inform people about their energy use and its consequences may encourage them to reduce energy consumption, but such informational interventions have not always been found to be effective. In addition, little is known about the factors that determine the effectiveness of informational interventions. Here, we examined the effect of an informational intervention campaign on household energy use (electricity and gas) in Mechelen, Belgium. Neighborhoods were randomized to different variants of the intervention that emphasized the monetary, environmental, or monetary and environmental consequences of saving energy. Across a three-year study period, we observed significantly larger reductions (two additional percentage points) in gas consumption in the intervention city than in four comparable control cities. This effect was largely driven by reductions in neighborhoods with high baseline levels of gas consumption. No substantial changes were found between neighborhoods that received monetary information, environmental information, or both. Our findings support the effectiveness of informational interventions for the reduction of energy use, point to the special role of high-consuming households, and can inform the design of future intervention campaigns.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003343/pdfft?md5=7b2c44cf820f4a4c43dda3026c938c04&pid=1-s2.0-S0301421524003343-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003343\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524003343","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

减少居民能源需求(尤其是高耗能家庭)对减缓气候变化至关重要。让人们了解自己的能源使用情况及其后果的干预措施可能会鼓励他们减少能源消耗,但这种信息干预措施并不总是有效。此外,人们对决定信息干预效果的因素知之甚少。在此,我们研究了在比利时梅赫伦开展的信息干预活动对家庭能源使用(电力和燃气)的影响。居民区被随机分配到不同的干预方案中,这些方案强调了节约能源的金钱、环境或金钱和环境后果。在为期三年的研究期间,我们观察到干预城市的煤气消耗量比四个可比对照城市明显减少(多两个百分点)。这一效果主要是由燃气消耗量基线水平较高的社区的减少所造成的。在接受货币信息、环境信息或同时接受这两种信息的居民区之间,没有发现实质性的变化。我们的研究结果证明了信息干预在减少能源使用方面的有效性,指出了高耗能家庭的特殊作用,并为未来干预活动的设计提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
For cash, the planet, or for both: Evaluating an informational intervention for energy consumption reduction

Reductions in residential energy demand (especially by high-consuming households) are critical for climate change mitigation. Interventions that inform people about their energy use and its consequences may encourage them to reduce energy consumption, but such informational interventions have not always been found to be effective. In addition, little is known about the factors that determine the effectiveness of informational interventions. Here, we examined the effect of an informational intervention campaign on household energy use (electricity and gas) in Mechelen, Belgium. Neighborhoods were randomized to different variants of the intervention that emphasized the monetary, environmental, or monetary and environmental consequences of saving energy. Across a three-year study period, we observed significantly larger reductions (two additional percentage points) in gas consumption in the intervention city than in four comparable control cities. This effect was largely driven by reductions in neighborhoods with high baseline levels of gas consumption. No substantial changes were found between neighborhoods that received monetary information, environmental information, or both. Our findings support the effectiveness of informational interventions for the reduction of energy use, point to the special role of high-consuming households, and can inform the design of future intervention campaigns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
期刊最新文献
Policy implications of implementing residential PV solar energy systems in developing regions A multi-phase qualitative study on consumers’ barriers and drivers of electric vehicle use in India: Policy implications The impact of digital economy on energy rebound effect in China: A stochastic energy demand frontier approach Editorial Board The value of decentral flexibility in nodal market design – A case study for Europe 2030
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1