自虚拟面试启动以来,普通外科住院医师配对面试期间赠送礼物的影响

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Surgical Education Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.07.012
{"title":"自虚拟面试启动以来,普通外科住院医师配对面试期间赠送礼物的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>Following the transition to virtual interviews in 2021, interviewees began receiving gifts as a recruitment strategy in lieu of the preinterview dinner. This study characterizes quantity, type, and frequency of gift receipt in relation to program perception and ranking.</p></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><p>An anonymous survey study was conducted. Variables included demographics, interview modality, gift type, frequency of gift receipt, monetary value, and changes in program perception and ranking. Descriptive analyses and Pearson's chi-square testing were performed.</p></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><p>Single institution with a medium to large general surgery program size.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><p>All general surgery residents at the single institution without exclusion.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>About 25 residents responded (60% response). Two respondents (8%) participated in both in-person (IPIs) and virtual interviews (VIs). About 72% (n = 18) participated in VIs, 36% (n = 9) IPIs. About 68% matched in 2021 or later. Overall, 76% received a gift during interviews. 100% of IPIs received a gift, while 67% of VIs received a gift. 88.9% of IPIs received a meal. VIs received: meal shared (28.6%), meal not shared (14.3%), food-specific gift card (28.6%), other food items (21.4%), or other (7.1%). About 66.7% of IPIs (n = 6) reported 76% to100% of programs offered a meal, whereas no VIs reported 76% to 100% of programs offering (p = 0.0002). VIs were less likely to have a shared meal experience (p = 0.017). About 55.5% of IPIs and VIs received nonfood gifts. Residents’ perception of a program's interest, resources, and ranking of the program were not significantly different based on gifting.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>Virtual interviews introduced heterogeneity in the receipt of gifts. The impact of a variable gifting experience is uncertain but raises concern for a potential new source of bias in the recruitment process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Gift Giving During General Surgery Resident Match Interviewing Since Initiation of Virtual Interviews\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.07.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>Following the transition to virtual interviews in 2021, interviewees began receiving gifts as a recruitment strategy in lieu of the preinterview dinner. This study characterizes quantity, type, and frequency of gift receipt in relation to program perception and ranking.</p></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><p>An anonymous survey study was conducted. Variables included demographics, interview modality, gift type, frequency of gift receipt, monetary value, and changes in program perception and ranking. Descriptive analyses and Pearson's chi-square testing were performed.</p></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><p>Single institution with a medium to large general surgery program size.</p></div><div><h3>PARTICIPANTS</h3><p>All general surgery residents at the single institution without exclusion.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>About 25 residents responded (60% response). Two respondents (8%) participated in both in-person (IPIs) and virtual interviews (VIs). About 72% (n = 18) participated in VIs, 36% (n = 9) IPIs. About 68% matched in 2021 or later. Overall, 76% received a gift during interviews. 100% of IPIs received a gift, while 67% of VIs received a gift. 88.9% of IPIs received a meal. VIs received: meal shared (28.6%), meal not shared (14.3%), food-specific gift card (28.6%), other food items (21.4%), or other (7.1%). About 66.7% of IPIs (n = 6) reported 76% to100% of programs offered a meal, whereas no VIs reported 76% to 100% of programs offering (p = 0.0002). VIs were less likely to have a shared meal experience (p = 0.017). About 55.5% of IPIs and VIs received nonfood gifts. Residents’ perception of a program's interest, resources, and ranking of the program were not significantly different based on gifting.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>Virtual interviews introduced heterogeneity in the receipt of gifts. The impact of a variable gifting experience is uncertain but raises concern for a potential new source of bias in the recruitment process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424003337\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424003337","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标在 2021 年过渡到虚拟面试后,受访者开始收到礼物,以此作为一种招聘策略,代替面试前的晚宴。本研究描述了收到礼物的数量、类型和频率与项目认知和排名的关系。变量包括人口统计学、面试方式、礼物类型、收到礼物的频率、货币价值以及项目认知和排名的变化。进行了描述性分析和皮尔逊卡方检验。调查对象为单个机构的所有普外科住院医师,无一例外。结果约有 25 名住院医师做出了回复(回复率为 60%)。两名受访者(8%)同时参加了面对面访谈(IPI)和虚拟访谈(VI)。约 72%(n = 18)参加了虚拟访谈,36%(n = 9)参加了 IPI。约 68% 在 2021 年或之后配对。总体而言,76% 的人在访谈期间收到了礼物。100% 的 IPI 接受了礼物,67% 的 VI 接受了礼物。88.9% 的 IPI 接受了一顿饭。自愿观察者收到的礼物有:共餐(28.6%)、不共餐(14.3%)、食品礼品卡(28.6%)、其他食品(21.4%)或其他(7.1%)。约 66.7% 的 IPIs(n = 6)报告 76% 至 100% 的项目提供膳食,而没有 VIs 报告 76% 至 100% 的项目提供膳食(p = 0.0002)。六岁以下儿童不太可能有共同进餐的经历(p = 0.017)。约 55.5% 的 IPI 和 VI 收到了非食品类礼品。居民对项目的兴趣、资源和项目排名的看法并没有因为礼物的不同而有显著差异。不同馈赠经历的影响尚不确定,但会引起人们对招聘过程中潜在的新偏见来源的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Gift Giving During General Surgery Resident Match Interviewing Since Initiation of Virtual Interviews

OBJECTIVE

Following the transition to virtual interviews in 2021, interviewees began receiving gifts as a recruitment strategy in lieu of the preinterview dinner. This study characterizes quantity, type, and frequency of gift receipt in relation to program perception and ranking.

DESIGN

An anonymous survey study was conducted. Variables included demographics, interview modality, gift type, frequency of gift receipt, monetary value, and changes in program perception and ranking. Descriptive analyses and Pearson's chi-square testing were performed.

SETTING

Single institution with a medium to large general surgery program size.

PARTICIPANTS

All general surgery residents at the single institution without exclusion.

RESULTS

About 25 residents responded (60% response). Two respondents (8%) participated in both in-person (IPIs) and virtual interviews (VIs). About 72% (n = 18) participated in VIs, 36% (n = 9) IPIs. About 68% matched in 2021 or later. Overall, 76% received a gift during interviews. 100% of IPIs received a gift, while 67% of VIs received a gift. 88.9% of IPIs received a meal. VIs received: meal shared (28.6%), meal not shared (14.3%), food-specific gift card (28.6%), other food items (21.4%), or other (7.1%). About 66.7% of IPIs (n = 6) reported 76% to100% of programs offered a meal, whereas no VIs reported 76% to 100% of programs offering (p = 0.0002). VIs were less likely to have a shared meal experience (p = 0.017). About 55.5% of IPIs and VIs received nonfood gifts. Residents’ perception of a program's interest, resources, and ranking of the program were not significantly different based on gifting.

CONCLUSION

Virtual interviews introduced heterogeneity in the receipt of gifts. The impact of a variable gifting experience is uncertain but raises concern for a potential new source of bias in the recruitment process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
期刊最新文献
Resident-Applicant Buddy Program Increases Applicant Interest and Program Transparency Promoting Surgical Resident Well-being Through Therapist-Facilitated Discussion Groups: A Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Geographic Match Location Patterns: Comparison of Pre and Post Virtual Interviews General Surgery Residency Applicant Perspectives on Alternative Residency Interview Models with Implementation of an Optional Second Look Day Implementation and Evaluation of an Academic Development Rotation for Surgery Residents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1