低收入和中等收入国家医疗专业人员对控制传染病的公平和排他性疫苗决策的争议。采用跨理论模式向前迈进

Rawshan Jabeen (Research Consultant) , Hassan Nawaz Tahir , Mubarak Jabeen Salman , Zeeshan Ahsan
{"title":"低收入和中等收入国家医疗专业人员对控制传染病的公平和排他性疫苗决策的争议。采用跨理论模式向前迈进","authors":"Rawshan Jabeen (Research Consultant) ,&nbsp;Hassan Nawaz Tahir ,&nbsp;Mubarak Jabeen Salman ,&nbsp;Zeeshan Ahsan","doi":"10.1016/j.vacune.2024.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The equitable distribution of vaccines for infectious diseases in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has become a hotly debated topic among public professionals and Government The decisions made in this regard can have far-reaching consequences for the health and well-being of millions of people including general population and healthcare professionals. There is need toconsider a fair and just distribution system to ensure that vaccines are provided to those who need them the most. For instance, Hepatitis B virus (HBV), influenza, and COVID-19 are crucial for healthcare professionals as they play in the fight against infectious disease outbreaks. However, in LMICs, poor vaccine confidence and uptake rates represent substantial hurdles for healthcare practitioners in obtaining and administering vaccines. Further, equitable vaccine uptake is a debatable policy matter in LMICs. These challenges stem from doubts regarding vaccine efficacy and safety, inaccurate information, and a lack of trust in government and medical institutions. Addressing misconceptions and building confidence, robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms requires to ensure the safety of vaccines. . This review highlighted the importance of enhancing vaccine uptake motivation among health workers. Moreover, enhance the the need to respect individual choice when refuse. Ultimately, building confidence in the healthcare system is critical for addressing healthcare providers' reluctance about vaccines. The transtheoretical model is extremely useful for for understanding the behaviours and factors increasing vaccine uptake notably for infection prevention against hepatitis B, COVID-19, and influenza. The immplication of framework provided a holistic approach by customizing solutions to each stage of behavior change, from awareness to continuing support. Emphasizing education, incentives, and a supportive environment promotes a resilient healthcare system, allowing health workers community to actively contribute to public health through effective infection control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101272,"journal":{"name":"Vacunas (English Edition)","volume":"25 3","pages":"Pages 367-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversy on fair and exclusive vaccine decisions for controlling infectious diseases among medical professionals in LMICs. Embracing the Trans-Theoretical Model for Moving Forward\",\"authors\":\"Rawshan Jabeen (Research Consultant) ,&nbsp;Hassan Nawaz Tahir ,&nbsp;Mubarak Jabeen Salman ,&nbsp;Zeeshan Ahsan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vacune.2024.08.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The equitable distribution of vaccines for infectious diseases in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has become a hotly debated topic among public professionals and Government The decisions made in this regard can have far-reaching consequences for the health and well-being of millions of people including general population and healthcare professionals. There is need toconsider a fair and just distribution system to ensure that vaccines are provided to those who need them the most. For instance, Hepatitis B virus (HBV), influenza, and COVID-19 are crucial for healthcare professionals as they play in the fight against infectious disease outbreaks. However, in LMICs, poor vaccine confidence and uptake rates represent substantial hurdles for healthcare practitioners in obtaining and administering vaccines. Further, equitable vaccine uptake is a debatable policy matter in LMICs. These challenges stem from doubts regarding vaccine efficacy and safety, inaccurate information, and a lack of trust in government and medical institutions. Addressing misconceptions and building confidence, robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms requires to ensure the safety of vaccines. . This review highlighted the importance of enhancing vaccine uptake motivation among health workers. Moreover, enhance the the need to respect individual choice when refuse. Ultimately, building confidence in the healthcare system is critical for addressing healthcare providers' reluctance about vaccines. The transtheoretical model is extremely useful for for understanding the behaviours and factors increasing vaccine uptake notably for infection prevention against hepatitis B, COVID-19, and influenza. The immplication of framework provided a holistic approach by customizing solutions to each stage of behavior change, from awareness to continuing support. Emphasizing education, incentives, and a supportive environment promotes a resilient healthcare system, allowing health workers community to actively contribute to public health through effective infection control.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vacunas (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 367-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vacunas (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445146024000621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vacunas (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445146024000621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中低收入国家(LMICs)传染病疫苗的公平分配已成为公共专业人员和政府之间争论的热点话题。有必要考虑建立一个公平公正的分配制度,以确保将疫苗提供给最需要的人。例如,乙型肝炎病毒 (HBV)、流感和 COVID-19 对医疗保健专业人员至关重要,因为他们在对抗传染病爆发方面发挥着重要作用。然而,在低收入和中等收入国家,疫苗的信任度和接种率很低,这对医疗从业人员获取和接种疫苗构成了巨大障碍。此外,在低收入和中等收入国家,疫苗的公平接种也是一个值得商榷的政策问题。这些挑战源于对疫苗有效性和安全性的怀疑、不准确的信息以及对政府和医疗机构缺乏信任。要消除误解和建立信心,就必须建立强有力的监测和评估机制,以确保疫苗的安全性。.此次审查强调了提高卫生工作者接种疫苗积极性的重要性。此外,在拒绝接受疫苗时,需要尊重个人选择。最终,建立对医疗保健系统的信心对于解决医疗保健提供者不愿意接种疫苗的问题至关重要。跨理论模型非常有助于理解增加疫苗接种率的行为和因素,尤其是预防乙型肝炎、COVID-19 和流感的疫苗。通过为行为改变的每个阶段(从认识到持续支持)定制解决方案,该框架的简化提供了一种整体方法。强调教育、激励和支持性环境可促进建立一个有弹性的医疗保健系统,使卫生工作者社区能够通过有效的感染控制为公共卫生做出积极贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Controversy on fair and exclusive vaccine decisions for controlling infectious diseases among medical professionals in LMICs. Embracing the Trans-Theoretical Model for Moving Forward

The equitable distribution of vaccines for infectious diseases in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has become a hotly debated topic among public professionals and Government The decisions made in this regard can have far-reaching consequences for the health and well-being of millions of people including general population and healthcare professionals. There is need toconsider a fair and just distribution system to ensure that vaccines are provided to those who need them the most. For instance, Hepatitis B virus (HBV), influenza, and COVID-19 are crucial for healthcare professionals as they play in the fight against infectious disease outbreaks. However, in LMICs, poor vaccine confidence and uptake rates represent substantial hurdles for healthcare practitioners in obtaining and administering vaccines. Further, equitable vaccine uptake is a debatable policy matter in LMICs. These challenges stem from doubts regarding vaccine efficacy and safety, inaccurate information, and a lack of trust in government and medical institutions. Addressing misconceptions and building confidence, robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms requires to ensure the safety of vaccines. . This review highlighted the importance of enhancing vaccine uptake motivation among health workers. Moreover, enhance the the need to respect individual choice when refuse. Ultimately, building confidence in the healthcare system is critical for addressing healthcare providers' reluctance about vaccines. The transtheoretical model is extremely useful for for understanding the behaviours and factors increasing vaccine uptake notably for infection prevention against hepatitis B, COVID-19, and influenza. The immplication of framework provided a holistic approach by customizing solutions to each stage of behavior change, from awareness to continuing support. Emphasizing education, incentives, and a supportive environment promotes a resilient healthcare system, allowing health workers community to actively contribute to public health through effective infection control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review of vaccine packaging formats and their key features Could molecular farming be a game changing paradigm in the production of immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer immunotherapy? Psychological characteristics and their impact on the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines Comments on “Prevalence of HCV among patients with HIV in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis” Measles eradication: Still a long and winding road
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1