国家认同与移民态度之间的关联:荟萃分析

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL International Journal of Intercultural Relations Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102031
Vainius Bartasevičius , Ivan Trunov
{"title":"国家认同与移民态度之间的关联:荟萃分析","authors":"Vainius Bartasevičius ,&nbsp;Ivan Trunov","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This meta-analysis focuses on the strength of association between four different national identity dimensions – national identification, national pride, nationalism, content of national identity – and pro-immigration attitudes. It seeks to provide systematic evidence on whether and to what extent there is a clash between efforts to strengthen national identity and create an accepting social environment for immigrant populations. The study collates and summarises evidence from 81 published and unpublished sources, 151 studies and 255 effect sizes. Drawing on random-effects meta-analysis models, we find statistically significant negative summary effect sizes of nationalism (Partial correlation coefficient (PCC) = −0.09, p &lt; 0.001) and support for ethnic national identity criteria (PCC = −0.11, p &lt; 0.001). The former is defined as the belief in superiority of one’s nation compared to others, and the latter relates to treating place of birth, ancestry, length of residence and religion as important national membership criteria. However, summary effect sizes of national identification, national pride, and support for civic national identity criteria were not statistically significant. The meta-regression models show that countries with a long immigration history (so-called settler societies) are characterised by a more positive association between national pride and pro-immigration attitudes than those for which immigration is a relatively new experience. We discuss the broader significance of these findings as well as offer potential future directions for the research field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 102031"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between dimensions of national identity and immigration attitudes: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Vainius Bartasevičius ,&nbsp;Ivan Trunov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This meta-analysis focuses on the strength of association between four different national identity dimensions – national identification, national pride, nationalism, content of national identity – and pro-immigration attitudes. It seeks to provide systematic evidence on whether and to what extent there is a clash between efforts to strengthen national identity and create an accepting social environment for immigrant populations. The study collates and summarises evidence from 81 published and unpublished sources, 151 studies and 255 effect sizes. Drawing on random-effects meta-analysis models, we find statistically significant negative summary effect sizes of nationalism (Partial correlation coefficient (PCC) = −0.09, p &lt; 0.001) and support for ethnic national identity criteria (PCC = −0.11, p &lt; 0.001). The former is defined as the belief in superiority of one’s nation compared to others, and the latter relates to treating place of birth, ancestry, length of residence and religion as important national membership criteria. However, summary effect sizes of national identification, national pride, and support for civic national identity criteria were not statistically significant. The meta-regression models show that countries with a long immigration history (so-called settler societies) are characterised by a more positive association between national pride and pro-immigration attitudes than those for which immigration is a relatively new experience. We discuss the broader significance of these findings as well as offer potential future directions for the research field.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724001007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724001007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本荟萃分析侧重于四个不同的国家认同维度--国家认同、民族自豪感、民族主义、国家认同的内容--与支持移民态度之间的关联强度。它试图提供系统的证据,说明加强国家认同的努力与为移民人口创造接纳的社会环境之间是否以及在多大程度上存在冲突。本研究整理并总结了来自 81 个已发表和未发表的资料来源、151 项研究和 255 个效应大小的证据。根据随机效应荟萃分析模型,我们发现民族主义(部分相关系数 (PCC) = -0.09,p <0.001)和对民族国家认同标准的支持(PCC = -0.11,p <0.001)在统计上具有显著的负效应。前者被定义为相信自己的民族比其他民族优越,后者则与将出生地、血统、居住时间和宗教信仰作为重要的民族成员标准有关。然而,国家认同、民族自豪感和支持公民国家认同标准的总效应大小在统计上并不显著。元回归模型显示,与移民历史相对较短的国家相比,移民历史较长的国家(所谓的定居者社会)的民族自豪感与支持移民的态度之间具有更积极的联系。我们讨论了这些发现的广泛意义,并为研究领域提供了潜在的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between dimensions of national identity and immigration attitudes: A meta-analysis

This meta-analysis focuses on the strength of association between four different national identity dimensions – national identification, national pride, nationalism, content of national identity – and pro-immigration attitudes. It seeks to provide systematic evidence on whether and to what extent there is a clash between efforts to strengthen national identity and create an accepting social environment for immigrant populations. The study collates and summarises evidence from 81 published and unpublished sources, 151 studies and 255 effect sizes. Drawing on random-effects meta-analysis models, we find statistically significant negative summary effect sizes of nationalism (Partial correlation coefficient (PCC) = −0.09, p < 0.001) and support for ethnic national identity criteria (PCC = −0.11, p < 0.001). The former is defined as the belief in superiority of one’s nation compared to others, and the latter relates to treating place of birth, ancestry, length of residence and religion as important national membership criteria. However, summary effect sizes of national identification, national pride, and support for civic national identity criteria were not statistically significant. The meta-regression models show that countries with a long immigration history (so-called settler societies) are characterised by a more positive association between national pride and pro-immigration attitudes than those for which immigration is a relatively new experience. We discuss the broader significance of these findings as well as offer potential future directions for the research field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The odyssey of Turkish school leaders in Africa: An expedition into professional identity, challenges, and cultural adaptations Geographical and aesthetic inclusiveness: A new cultural worldview? The case of nine European countries The effects of refugees’ emotional tears on felt emotions and helping behaviors Interethnic workplace relations in times of heightened social tension: Israeli-Arab teachers in Jewish schools post-10/7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1