局部复发直肠癌剂量递增质子再照射前瞻性 II 期试验中的分段间运动稳健性

Christina G. Truelsen , Heidi S. Rønde , Jesper F. Kallehauge , Laurids Ø. Poulsen , Birgitte M. Havelund , Bodil G. Pedersen , Lene H. Iversen , Karen-Lise G. Spindler , Camilla S. Kronborg
{"title":"局部复发直肠癌剂量递增质子再照射前瞻性 II 期试验中的分段间运动稳健性","authors":"Christina G. Truelsen ,&nbsp;Heidi S. Rønde ,&nbsp;Jesper F. Kallehauge ,&nbsp;Laurids Ø. Poulsen ,&nbsp;Birgitte M. Havelund ,&nbsp;Bodil G. Pedersen ,&nbsp;Lene H. Iversen ,&nbsp;Karen-Lise G. Spindler ,&nbsp;Camilla S. Kronborg","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) enables generation of conformal dose plans with organ at risk (OAR) sparing potential. However, pelvic IMPT robustness is challenged by inter-fraction motion caused by constant anatomical variations. In this study, the dosimetric impact of inter-fraction motion on target coverage and dose to OAR was quantified in the prospective phase II study ReRad-II on dose-escalated proton reirradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The inter-fraction motion robustness was assessed for the initial twelve patients enrolled in the ReRad-II study. Patients with resectable LRRC were assessed for neoadjuvant IMPT (55 Gy(RBE)/44Fx) and unresectable recurrences for definitive IMPT (57.5–65 Gy(RBE)/ 46-52Fx). Target coverage and dose to OAR were assessed for robustly optimised three-field IMPT, on 12 plan computerized tomography (CT) scans (pCT) − and 47 repetitive control CT scans (cCTs) during the treatment. The target coverage and doses to OAR were re-calculated on each cCT and the mean dose ratio (pCT/cCT-ratio) and target coverage (V<sub>95%</sub>) was evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The target coverage was robust with a mean dose pCT/cCT-ratio of 1.00 (+/-1%). The V<sub>95%</sub> target coverage for every cCT were above the accepted worst-case scenario in the robust evaluation. Considerable variation in bladder-, bowel bag-, and bowel loop volume was observed. The OAR with the largest variation in ratio was the bladder (pCT/cCT-ratio: 1.3 (range: 0.5–4.7).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>IMPT for dose-escalated reirradiation of LRRC provided anatomically robust target coverage despite OAR changes. Inter-fraction motion resulted in OAR doses varying within clinically acceptable range.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001040/pdfft?md5=731e13668a424ef4ff17ecc41f64328a&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624001040-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-fraction motion robustness in a prospective phase II trial on dose-escalated proton reirradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer\",\"authors\":\"Christina G. Truelsen ,&nbsp;Heidi S. Rønde ,&nbsp;Jesper F. Kallehauge ,&nbsp;Laurids Ø. Poulsen ,&nbsp;Birgitte M. Havelund ,&nbsp;Bodil G. Pedersen ,&nbsp;Lene H. Iversen ,&nbsp;Karen-Lise G. Spindler ,&nbsp;Camilla S. Kronborg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) enables generation of conformal dose plans with organ at risk (OAR) sparing potential. However, pelvic IMPT robustness is challenged by inter-fraction motion caused by constant anatomical variations. In this study, the dosimetric impact of inter-fraction motion on target coverage and dose to OAR was quantified in the prospective phase II study ReRad-II on dose-escalated proton reirradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The inter-fraction motion robustness was assessed for the initial twelve patients enrolled in the ReRad-II study. Patients with resectable LRRC were assessed for neoadjuvant IMPT (55 Gy(RBE)/44Fx) and unresectable recurrences for definitive IMPT (57.5–65 Gy(RBE)/ 46-52Fx). Target coverage and dose to OAR were assessed for robustly optimised three-field IMPT, on 12 plan computerized tomography (CT) scans (pCT) − and 47 repetitive control CT scans (cCTs) during the treatment. The target coverage and doses to OAR were re-calculated on each cCT and the mean dose ratio (pCT/cCT-ratio) and target coverage (V<sub>95%</sub>) was evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The target coverage was robust with a mean dose pCT/cCT-ratio of 1.00 (+/-1%). The V<sub>95%</sub> target coverage for every cCT were above the accepted worst-case scenario in the robust evaluation. Considerable variation in bladder-, bowel bag-, and bowel loop volume was observed. The OAR with the largest variation in ratio was the bladder (pCT/cCT-ratio: 1.3 (range: 0.5–4.7).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>IMPT for dose-escalated reirradiation of LRRC provided anatomically robust target coverage despite OAR changes. Inter-fraction motion resulted in OAR doses varying within clinically acceptable range.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001040/pdfft?md5=731e13668a424ef4ff17ecc41f64328a&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624001040-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的强度调制质子疗法(IMPT)能够生成保形剂量计划,并具有疏通危险器官(OAR)的潜力。然而,骨盆 IMPT 的稳健性受到了解剖结构持续变化导致的分段间运动的挑战。在这项研究中,前瞻性 II 期研究 ReRad-II 对局部复发直肠癌(LRRC)的剂量递增质子再照射进行了研究,量化了分段间运动对目标覆盖和 OAR 剂量的剂量学影响。对可切除的 LRRC 患者进行了新辅助 IMPT(55 Gy(RBE)/44Fx )评估,对不可切除的复发患者进行了最终 IMPT(57.5-65 Gy(RBE)/46-52Fx )评估。在治疗过程中,通过 12 次计划计算机断层扫描 (CT)(pCT)和 47 次重复对照 CT 扫描(cCT),对稳健优化的三场 IMPT 的靶点覆盖率和 OAR 剂量进行了评估。对每次 cCT 的目标覆盖率和 OAR 剂量进行了重新计算,并评估了平均剂量比(pCT/cCT-ratio)和目标覆盖率(V95%)。在稳健性评估中,每个 cCT 的 V95% 目标覆盖率都高于公认的最坏情况。观察到膀胱、肠袋和肠环容积有相当大的差异。膀胱的OAR比值变化最大(pCT/cCT比值:1.3(范围:0.5-4.7))。分段间移动导致OAR剂量在临床可接受范围内变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inter-fraction motion robustness in a prospective phase II trial on dose-escalated proton reirradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer

Background and purpose

Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) enables generation of conformal dose plans with organ at risk (OAR) sparing potential. However, pelvic IMPT robustness is challenged by inter-fraction motion caused by constant anatomical variations. In this study, the dosimetric impact of inter-fraction motion on target coverage and dose to OAR was quantified in the prospective phase II study ReRad-II on dose-escalated proton reirradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).

Materials and methods

The inter-fraction motion robustness was assessed for the initial twelve patients enrolled in the ReRad-II study. Patients with resectable LRRC were assessed for neoadjuvant IMPT (55 Gy(RBE)/44Fx) and unresectable recurrences for definitive IMPT (57.5–65 Gy(RBE)/ 46-52Fx). Target coverage and dose to OAR were assessed for robustly optimised three-field IMPT, on 12 plan computerized tomography (CT) scans (pCT) − and 47 repetitive control CT scans (cCTs) during the treatment. The target coverage and doses to OAR were re-calculated on each cCT and the mean dose ratio (pCT/cCT-ratio) and target coverage (V95%) was evaluated.

Results

The target coverage was robust with a mean dose pCT/cCT-ratio of 1.00 (+/-1%). The V95% target coverage for every cCT were above the accepted worst-case scenario in the robust evaluation. Considerable variation in bladder-, bowel bag-, and bowel loop volume was observed. The OAR with the largest variation in ratio was the bladder (pCT/cCT-ratio: 1.3 (range: 0.5–4.7).

Conclusions

IMPT for dose-escalated reirradiation of LRRC provided anatomically robust target coverage despite OAR changes. Inter-fraction motion resulted in OAR doses varying within clinically acceptable range.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Results of 2023 survey on the use of synthetic computed tomography for magnetic resonance Imaging-only radiotherapy: Current status and future steps Head and neck automatic multi-organ segmentation on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Automatic segmentation for magnetic resonance imaging guided individual elective lymph node irradiation in head and neck cancer patients Development of a novel 3D-printed dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom for evaluation of four-dimensional computed tomography Technical feasibility of delivering a simultaneous integrated boost in partial breast irradiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1