解读县域城市化过程中城乡土地利用动态的差异:比较社会空间分析方法

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105343
{"title":"解读县域城市化过程中城乡土地利用动态的差异:比较社会空间分析方法","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the evolving rural-urban landscape in China's rapid urbanization, contextualized within post-1978 social transitions. Using a socio-spatial analytics approach and mechanism theory, we compare rural-urban land use dynamics (RULD) in Kunshan and Nanhai, located in the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta regions respectively. The study analyzes factors driving RULD changes through actors' practices, attributing differences to globalization timing, land rights consciousness, and resulting path dependencies. These elements have shaped political-commercial alliances and land development norms, leading to inconsistent RULD over time. Two key arguments emerge: First, contemporary RULD divergence stems from socioeconomic transitions, distinct from environmental constraints in agrarian societies. Second, this divergence reflects cross-scale state-market-society interactions at the macro level, while resulting from multi-scale actor negotiations at the micro level. This research contributes to understanding complex urbanization processes in transitional economies, offering insights into socio-spatial dynamics of rural-urban transformations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking divergent rural-urban land use dynamics in county urbanization: A comparative socio-spatial analytics approach\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper examines the evolving rural-urban landscape in China's rapid urbanization, contextualized within post-1978 social transitions. Using a socio-spatial analytics approach and mechanism theory, we compare rural-urban land use dynamics (RULD) in Kunshan and Nanhai, located in the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta regions respectively. The study analyzes factors driving RULD changes through actors' practices, attributing differences to globalization timing, land rights consciousness, and resulting path dependencies. These elements have shaped political-commercial alliances and land development norms, leading to inconsistent RULD over time. Two key arguments emerge: First, contemporary RULD divergence stems from socioeconomic transitions, distinct from environmental constraints in agrarian societies. Second, this divergence reflects cross-scale state-market-society interactions at the macro level, while resulting from multi-scale actor negotiations at the micro level. This research contributes to understanding complex urbanization processes in transitional economies, offering insights into socio-spatial dynamics of rural-urban transformations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124005572\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124005572","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以 1978 年后的社会转型为背景,研究了中国快速城市化进程中不断演变的城乡面貌。利用社会空间分析方法和机制理论,我们比较了分别位于长江三角洲和珠江三角洲地区的昆山和南海的城乡土地利用动态(RULD)。研究通过行动者的实践分析了推动城乡土地利用变化的因素,并将差异归因于全球化时机、土地权利意识以及由此产生的路径依赖。这些因素塑造了政治-商业联盟和土地开发规范,导致土地利用、土地利用价值随时间推移而不一致。有两个关键论点:首先,当代 RULD 的差异源于社会经济转型,有别于农业社会的环境制约。其次,这种分歧反映了宏观层面上跨尺度的国家-市场-社会互动,同时也是微观层面上多尺度行为者协商的结果。这项研究有助于理解转型经济体中复杂的城市化进程,为城乡转型的社会空间动态提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unpacking divergent rural-urban land use dynamics in county urbanization: A comparative socio-spatial analytics approach

This paper examines the evolving rural-urban landscape in China's rapid urbanization, contextualized within post-1978 social transitions. Using a socio-spatial analytics approach and mechanism theory, we compare rural-urban land use dynamics (RULD) in Kunshan and Nanhai, located in the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta regions respectively. The study analyzes factors driving RULD changes through actors' practices, attributing differences to globalization timing, land rights consciousness, and resulting path dependencies. These elements have shaped political-commercial alliances and land development norms, leading to inconsistent RULD over time. Two key arguments emerge: First, contemporary RULD divergence stems from socioeconomic transitions, distinct from environmental constraints in agrarian societies. Second, this divergence reflects cross-scale state-market-society interactions at the macro level, while resulting from multi-scale actor negotiations at the micro level. This research contributes to understanding complex urbanization processes in transitional economies, offering insights into socio-spatial dynamics of rural-urban transformations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
How do complete streets policies and legislative ordinances implement explicit wording regarding low-income populations and communities of color? A qualitative analysis Hot and bothered: Exploring the effect of heat on pedestrian route choice behavior and accessibility Does homeownership improve physical health? Evidence from a quasi-experiment in Hong Kong The recovery from the pandemic: A spatial-temporal analysis on the changes in mobility and public attitude in Singapore How to build vibrant communities by utilizing functional zones? A community-detection-based approach for revealing the association between land use and community vibrancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1