电子提示促进老年人持续接种流感疫苗:全国随机 NUDGE-FLU-2 试验

IF 58.7 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Nature Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1038/s41591-024-03202-4
Niklas Dyrby Johansen, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Ankeet S. Bhatt, Daniel Modin, Safia Chatur, Brian L. Claggett, Kira Hyldekær Janstrup, Carsten Schade Larsen, Lykke Larsen, Lothar Wiese, Michael Dalager-Pedersen, Lars Køber, Scott D. Solomon, Pradeesh Sivapalan, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen, Cyril Jean-Marie Martel, Tyra Grove Krause, Tor Biering-Sørensen
{"title":"电子提示促进老年人持续接种流感疫苗:全国随机 NUDGE-FLU-2 试验","authors":"Niklas Dyrby Johansen, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Ankeet S. Bhatt, Daniel Modin, Safia Chatur, Brian L. Claggett, Kira Hyldekær Janstrup, Carsten Schade Larsen, Lykke Larsen, Lothar Wiese, Michael Dalager-Pedersen, Lars Køber, Scott D. Solomon, Pradeesh Sivapalan, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen, Cyril Jean-Marie Martel, Tyra Grove Krause, Tor Biering-Sørensen","doi":"10.1038/s41591-024-03202-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital letter interventions have proven effective in increasing influenza vaccination rates. In this trial, we sought to further refine these strategies and investigated whether the effectiveness of the strategies could be sustained across consecutive influenza seasons. We enrolled all eligible Danish citizens 65 years of age or older in a nationwide registry-based randomized implementation trial during the 2023–2024 influenza season. Households of participants were randomly assigned in a 2.45:1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio to usual care or six different behaviorally informed electronic letter-based nudges delivered before the influenza vaccination period. The primary endpoint was receipt of influenza vaccination. Statistical analyses accounted for household-level clustering. A total of 881,373 participants (mean age 74.1 ± 6.5 years, 52.1% female) were randomized across 649,487 households. The primary endpoint was met; influenza vaccination rates were higher in the pooled intervention letter group compared to usual care (76.32% versus 76.02%; difference, 0.31 percentage points; 99.29% confidence interval, 0.00–0.61; P = 0.007). Although no individual letter significantly increased influenza vaccination rates, the directionality of effect was consistent across all letters. Effectiveness was particularly pronounced in participants who had not received influenza vaccination during the preceding season (Pinteraction = 0.010). Effectiveness was consistent regardless of whether participants had received a similar electronic letter-based nudge in the preceding season (Pinteraction = 0.26). In summary, electronic letter-based nudges successfully increased influenza vaccination among older adults, and our results suggest that these highly scalable strategies can be implemented effectively and safely across consecutive vaccination seasons. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT06030726 . In the second season of a series of pragmatic trials involving all Danish citizens 65 years of age or older, electronic nudges increased influenza vaccination rates significantly with respect to usual care, with higher effect in individuals not vaccinated in the previous season.","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"30 11","pages":"3142-3149"},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic nudges for sustained influenza vaccination uptake in older adults: the nationwide randomized NUDGE-FLU-2 trial\",\"authors\":\"Niklas Dyrby Johansen, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Ankeet S. Bhatt, Daniel Modin, Safia Chatur, Brian L. Claggett, Kira Hyldekær Janstrup, Carsten Schade Larsen, Lykke Larsen, Lothar Wiese, Michael Dalager-Pedersen, Lars Køber, Scott D. Solomon, Pradeesh Sivapalan, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen, Cyril Jean-Marie Martel, Tyra Grove Krause, Tor Biering-Sørensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-024-03202-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital letter interventions have proven effective in increasing influenza vaccination rates. In this trial, we sought to further refine these strategies and investigated whether the effectiveness of the strategies could be sustained across consecutive influenza seasons. We enrolled all eligible Danish citizens 65 years of age or older in a nationwide registry-based randomized implementation trial during the 2023–2024 influenza season. Households of participants were randomly assigned in a 2.45:1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio to usual care or six different behaviorally informed electronic letter-based nudges delivered before the influenza vaccination period. The primary endpoint was receipt of influenza vaccination. Statistical analyses accounted for household-level clustering. A total of 881,373 participants (mean age 74.1 ± 6.5 years, 52.1% female) were randomized across 649,487 households. The primary endpoint was met; influenza vaccination rates were higher in the pooled intervention letter group compared to usual care (76.32% versus 76.02%; difference, 0.31 percentage points; 99.29% confidence interval, 0.00–0.61; P = 0.007). Although no individual letter significantly increased influenza vaccination rates, the directionality of effect was consistent across all letters. Effectiveness was particularly pronounced in participants who had not received influenza vaccination during the preceding season (Pinteraction = 0.010). Effectiveness was consistent regardless of whether participants had received a similar electronic letter-based nudge in the preceding season (Pinteraction = 0.26). In summary, electronic letter-based nudges successfully increased influenza vaccination among older adults, and our results suggest that these highly scalable strategies can be implemented effectively and safely across consecutive vaccination seasons. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT06030726 . In the second season of a series of pragmatic trials involving all Danish citizens 65 years of age or older, electronic nudges increased influenza vaccination rates significantly with respect to usual care, with higher effect in individuals not vaccinated in the previous season.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"30 11\",\"pages\":\"3142-3149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":58.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03202-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03202-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事实证明,数字信件干预措施能有效提高流感疫苗接种率。在这项试验中,我们试图进一步完善这些策略,并研究这些策略的有效性是否能在连续的流感季节中持续保持。在 2023-2024 年流感季节期间,我们在全国范围内开展了一项以登记为基础的随机实施试验,招募了所有符合条件的 65 岁及以上丹麦公民。参与者家庭按 2.45:1:1:1:1:1:1:1 的比例被随机分配到常规护理或在流感疫苗接种期之前提供的六种不同的行为知情电子信件提示。主要终点是接受流感疫苗接种。统计分析考虑了家庭层面的聚类。共有 881,373 名参与者(平均年龄为 74.1 ± 6.5 岁,52.1% 为女性)在 649,487 个家庭中进行了随机接种。主要终点已经达到;与常规护理相比,综合干预信件组的流感疫苗接种率更高(76.32% 对 76.02%;差异,0.31 个百分点;99.29% 置信区间,0.00-0.61;P = 0.007)。虽然没有一封信能明显提高流感疫苗接种率,但所有信件的效果方向是一致的。对于上一季度未接种过流感疫苗的参与者,效果尤为明显(Pinteraction = 0.010)。无论参与者在上一季度是否接受过类似的电子信件劝导,效果都是一致的(Pinteraction = 0.26)。总之,基于电子信件的提示成功地提高了老年人的流感疫苗接种率,我们的研究结果表明,这些高度可扩展的策略可以在连续的疫苗接种季中有效、安全地实施:NCT06030726。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electronic nudges for sustained influenza vaccination uptake in older adults: the nationwide randomized NUDGE-FLU-2 trial
Digital letter interventions have proven effective in increasing influenza vaccination rates. In this trial, we sought to further refine these strategies and investigated whether the effectiveness of the strategies could be sustained across consecutive influenza seasons. We enrolled all eligible Danish citizens 65 years of age or older in a nationwide registry-based randomized implementation trial during the 2023–2024 influenza season. Households of participants were randomly assigned in a 2.45:1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio to usual care or six different behaviorally informed electronic letter-based nudges delivered before the influenza vaccination period. The primary endpoint was receipt of influenza vaccination. Statistical analyses accounted for household-level clustering. A total of 881,373 participants (mean age 74.1 ± 6.5 years, 52.1% female) were randomized across 649,487 households. The primary endpoint was met; influenza vaccination rates were higher in the pooled intervention letter group compared to usual care (76.32% versus 76.02%; difference, 0.31 percentage points; 99.29% confidence interval, 0.00–0.61; P = 0.007). Although no individual letter significantly increased influenza vaccination rates, the directionality of effect was consistent across all letters. Effectiveness was particularly pronounced in participants who had not received influenza vaccination during the preceding season (Pinteraction = 0.010). Effectiveness was consistent regardless of whether participants had received a similar electronic letter-based nudge in the preceding season (Pinteraction = 0.26). In summary, electronic letter-based nudges successfully increased influenza vaccination among older adults, and our results suggest that these highly scalable strategies can be implemented effectively and safely across consecutive vaccination seasons. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT06030726 . In the second season of a series of pragmatic trials involving all Danish citizens 65 years of age or older, electronic nudges increased influenza vaccination rates significantly with respect to usual care, with higher effect in individuals not vaccinated in the previous season.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
Author Correction: Subclassification of obesity for precision prediction of cardiometabolic diseases Limiting babies’ sugar intake protects them against chronic diseases Editorial Expression of Concern: Tumor-selective action of HDAC inhibitors involves TRAIL induction in acute myeloid leukemia cells High-resolution spatial multiomic census of the human placenta An organotypic atlas of human vascular cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1