从大型综合医疗保健系统的电子健康记录中识别不同妊娠人群中的选择性引产。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1055/a-2405-3703
Fagen Xie, Michael J Fassett, Theresa M Im, Daniella Park, Vicki Y Chiu, Darios Getahun
{"title":"从大型综合医疗保健系统的电子健康记录中识别不同妊娠人群中的选择性引产。","authors":"Fagen Xie, Michael J Fassett, Theresa M Im, Daniella Park, Vicki Y Chiu, Darios Getahun","doi":"10.1055/a-2405-3703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Distinguishing between medically indicated induction of labor (iIOL) and elective induction of labor (eIOL) is a daunting process for researchers. We aimed to develop a Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithm to identify eIOLs from electronic health records (EHRs) within a large integrated health care system.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> We used structured and unstructured data from Kaiser Permanente Southern California's EHRs of patients who were <35 years old and had singleton deliveries between 37 and 40 gestational weeks. Induction of labor (IOL) pregnancies were identified if there was evidence of an IOL diagnosis code, procedure code, or documentation in a delivery flowsheet or progress note. A comprehensive NLP algorithm was developed and refined through an iterative process of chart reviews and adjudications, where IOL-associated reasons (medically indicated vs. elective induction) were reviewed. The final algorithm was applied to discern the indications of IOLs performed during the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 332,163 eligible pregnancies were identified between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2022. Of these eligible pregnancies, 68,541 (20.6%) were IOL, of which 6,824 (10.0%) were eIOL. Validation of the NLP process against 300 randomly selected pregnancies (100 eIOL, iIOL, and non-IOL cases each) yielded a positive predictive value of 83.0% and 88.0% for eIOL and iIOL, respectively. The rates of eIOL among the maternal age groups ranged between 9.6 and 10.3%, except for the <20 years group (12.2%). Non-Hispanic White individuals had the highest rate of eIOL (13.2%), while non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders had the lowest rate of eIOL (7.8%). The rate of eIOL increased from 1.0% in the 37-week gestational age (GA) group to 20.6% in the 40-week GA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Findings suggest that the developed NLP algorithm effectively identifies eIOL. It can be utilized to support eIOL-related pharmacoepidemiological studies, fill in knowledge gaps, and provide content more relevant to researchers.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· An NLP algorithm was developed to identify indications of IOL.. · The study algorithm was successfully implemented within a large integrated health care system.. · The study algorithm can be utilized to support eIOL-related studies..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"495-501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Elective Induction of Labor among a Diverse Pregnant Population from Electronic Health Records within a Large Integrated Health Care System.\",\"authors\":\"Fagen Xie, Michael J Fassett, Theresa M Im, Daniella Park, Vicki Y Chiu, Darios Getahun\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2405-3703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> Distinguishing between medically indicated induction of labor (iIOL) and elective induction of labor (eIOL) is a daunting process for researchers. We aimed to develop a Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithm to identify eIOLs from electronic health records (EHRs) within a large integrated health care system.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> We used structured and unstructured data from Kaiser Permanente Southern California's EHRs of patients who were <35 years old and had singleton deliveries between 37 and 40 gestational weeks. Induction of labor (IOL) pregnancies were identified if there was evidence of an IOL diagnosis code, procedure code, or documentation in a delivery flowsheet or progress note. A comprehensive NLP algorithm was developed and refined through an iterative process of chart reviews and adjudications, where IOL-associated reasons (medically indicated vs. elective induction) were reviewed. The final algorithm was applied to discern the indications of IOLs performed during the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 332,163 eligible pregnancies were identified between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2022. Of these eligible pregnancies, 68,541 (20.6%) were IOL, of which 6,824 (10.0%) were eIOL. Validation of the NLP process against 300 randomly selected pregnancies (100 eIOL, iIOL, and non-IOL cases each) yielded a positive predictive value of 83.0% and 88.0% for eIOL and iIOL, respectively. The rates of eIOL among the maternal age groups ranged between 9.6 and 10.3%, except for the <20 years group (12.2%). Non-Hispanic White individuals had the highest rate of eIOL (13.2%), while non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders had the lowest rate of eIOL (7.8%). The rate of eIOL increased from 1.0% in the 37-week gestational age (GA) group to 20.6% in the 40-week GA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Findings suggest that the developed NLP algorithm effectively identifies eIOL. It can be utilized to support eIOL-related pharmacoepidemiological studies, fill in knowledge gaps, and provide content more relevant to researchers.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· An NLP algorithm was developed to identify indications of IOL.. · The study algorithm was successfully implemented within a large integrated health care system.. · The study algorithm can be utilized to support eIOL-related studies..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"495-501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2405-3703\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2405-3703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对于研究人员来说,区分医学指征引产(iIOL)和选择性引产(eIOL)是一个艰巨的过程。我们旨在开发一种自然语言处理(NLP)算法,以便从大型综合医疗保健系统的电子健康记录(EHR)中识别eIOL:研究设计:我们使用了南加州凯泽医疗集团电子病历中的结构化和非结构化数据:在 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 1 月 31 日期间,共确定了 332,163 名符合条件的孕妇。在这些符合条件的孕妇中,68,541 例(20.6%)为 IOL,其中 6,824 例(10.0%)为 eIOL。通过对随机抽取的 300 例孕妇(eIOL、iIOL 和非 IOL 各 100 例)进行 NLP 流程验证,得出 eIOL 和 iIOL 的阳性预测值分别为 83.0% 和 88.0%。除 20 岁以下年龄组(12.2%)外,各年龄组产妇的 eIOL 感染率介于 9.6%-10.3% 之间。非西班牙裔白人的 eIOL 比率最高(13.2%),而非西班牙裔亚洲/太平洋岛民的 eIOL 比率最低(7.8%)。eIOL率从孕龄37周组的1.0%上升到孕龄40周组的20.6%:研究结果表明,所开发的 NLP 算法能有效识别 eIOL。结论:研究结果表明,开发的 NLP 算法能有效识别 eIOL,可用于支持与 eIOL 相关的药物流行病学研究,填补知识空白,为研究人员提供更多相关内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying Elective Induction of Labor among a Diverse Pregnant Population from Electronic Health Records within a Large Integrated Health Care System.

Objective:  Distinguishing between medically indicated induction of labor (iIOL) and elective induction of labor (eIOL) is a daunting process for researchers. We aimed to develop a Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithm to identify eIOLs from electronic health records (EHRs) within a large integrated health care system.

Study design:  We used structured and unstructured data from Kaiser Permanente Southern California's EHRs of patients who were <35 years old and had singleton deliveries between 37 and 40 gestational weeks. Induction of labor (IOL) pregnancies were identified if there was evidence of an IOL diagnosis code, procedure code, or documentation in a delivery flowsheet or progress note. A comprehensive NLP algorithm was developed and refined through an iterative process of chart reviews and adjudications, where IOL-associated reasons (medically indicated vs. elective induction) were reviewed. The final algorithm was applied to discern the indications of IOLs performed during the study period.

Results:  A total of 332,163 eligible pregnancies were identified between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2022. Of these eligible pregnancies, 68,541 (20.6%) were IOL, of which 6,824 (10.0%) were eIOL. Validation of the NLP process against 300 randomly selected pregnancies (100 eIOL, iIOL, and non-IOL cases each) yielded a positive predictive value of 83.0% and 88.0% for eIOL and iIOL, respectively. The rates of eIOL among the maternal age groups ranged between 9.6 and 10.3%, except for the <20 years group (12.2%). Non-Hispanic White individuals had the highest rate of eIOL (13.2%), while non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders had the lowest rate of eIOL (7.8%). The rate of eIOL increased from 1.0% in the 37-week gestational age (GA) group to 20.6% in the 40-week GA group.

Conclusion:  Findings suggest that the developed NLP algorithm effectively identifies eIOL. It can be utilized to support eIOL-related pharmacoepidemiological studies, fill in knowledge gaps, and provide content more relevant to researchers.

Key points: · An NLP algorithm was developed to identify indications of IOL.. · The study algorithm was successfully implemented within a large integrated health care system.. · The study algorithm can be utilized to support eIOL-related studies..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Unintended Upper Uterine Wall Extensions at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: Risk Factors and Associated Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. Cost Comparison of a Traditional Didactic versus National Flipped Classroom Curriculum. Implementation of a Standardized Protocol for Postpartum Anemia: A Prospective Cohort Study. Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: Pregnancy and Delivery-Specific Considerations and Outcomes. Spontaneous Umbilical Cord Vascular Rupture during Labor: A Retrospective Analysis of 12 Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1