揭示位于不同异构位点的抑制剂调节野生型和突变型 KRAS (G12) 活性的分子机制。

IF 3.8 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Archives of biochemistry and biophysics Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.abb.2024.110137
Ye Liu , Yan Li , Guohui Li , Anhui Wang , Huiying Chu
{"title":"揭示位于不同异构位点的抑制剂调节野生型和突变型 KRAS (G12) 活性的分子机制。","authors":"Ye Liu ,&nbsp;Yan Li ,&nbsp;Guohui Li ,&nbsp;Anhui Wang ,&nbsp;Huiying Chu","doi":"10.1016/j.abb.2024.110137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As the important hub of many cellular signaling networks, KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue) has been identified as a tumor biomarker. It is the frequently mutated oncogene in human cancers, and KRAS protein activation caused by mutations, such as G12D, has been found in many human tumors tissues. Although, there are two specific allosteric sites (AS1 and AS2) on the KRAS protein that can be used as the targets for inhibitor development, the difference of regulatory mechanisms between two individual allosteric sites still not be reported. Here, using molecular dynamics simulations combined with molecular mechanics generalized born surface area (MM/GBSA) analysis, we found that both of the inhibitors, located at AS1 and AS2, were able to reduce the binding free energy between wild type, mutant KRAS (G12/D/V/S/C) and GTP remarkably, however the effect of inhibitors on the binding free energy between wild type, mutant KRAS and GDP was limited. In addition, the degree of decrease of binding free energy between KRAS and GTP caused by inhibitors at AS2 was significantly greater than that caused by inhibitors at AS1. Further analysis revealed that both inhibitors at AS1 and AS2 were able to regulate the fluctuation of Switch Ⅰ and Switch Ⅱ to expand the pocket of the orthosteric site (GTP binding site), thereby reducing the binding of KRAS to GTP. Noteworthy there was significant differences in the regulatory preferences on Switch Ⅰ and Switch Ⅱ between two type inhibitor. The inhibitor at AS2 mainly regulated Switch Ⅱ to affect the pocket of the orthosteric site, while the inhibitor at AS1 mainly expand the pocket of the orthosteric site by regulating the fluctuation of Switch Ⅰ. Our study compared the differences between two type inhibitors in regulating the KRAS protein activity and revealed the advantages of the AS2 as the small molecule drug target, aiming to provide theoretical guidance for the research of novel KRAS protein inhibitors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8174,"journal":{"name":"Archives of biochemistry and biophysics","volume":"760 ","pages":"Article 110137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insight of the molecular mechanism of inhibitors located at different allosteric sites regulating the activity of wild type and mutant KRAS (G12)\",\"authors\":\"Ye Liu ,&nbsp;Yan Li ,&nbsp;Guohui Li ,&nbsp;Anhui Wang ,&nbsp;Huiying Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.abb.2024.110137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As the important hub of many cellular signaling networks, KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue) has been identified as a tumor biomarker. It is the frequently mutated oncogene in human cancers, and KRAS protein activation caused by mutations, such as G12D, has been found in many human tumors tissues. Although, there are two specific allosteric sites (AS1 and AS2) on the KRAS protein that can be used as the targets for inhibitor development, the difference of regulatory mechanisms between two individual allosteric sites still not be reported. Here, using molecular dynamics simulations combined with molecular mechanics generalized born surface area (MM/GBSA) analysis, we found that both of the inhibitors, located at AS1 and AS2, were able to reduce the binding free energy between wild type, mutant KRAS (G12/D/V/S/C) and GTP remarkably, however the effect of inhibitors on the binding free energy between wild type, mutant KRAS and GDP was limited. In addition, the degree of decrease of binding free energy between KRAS and GTP caused by inhibitors at AS2 was significantly greater than that caused by inhibitors at AS1. Further analysis revealed that both inhibitors at AS1 and AS2 were able to regulate the fluctuation of Switch Ⅰ and Switch Ⅱ to expand the pocket of the orthosteric site (GTP binding site), thereby reducing the binding of KRAS to GTP. Noteworthy there was significant differences in the regulatory preferences on Switch Ⅰ and Switch Ⅱ between two type inhibitor. The inhibitor at AS2 mainly regulated Switch Ⅱ to affect the pocket of the orthosteric site, while the inhibitor at AS1 mainly expand the pocket of the orthosteric site by regulating the fluctuation of Switch Ⅰ. Our study compared the differences between two type inhibitors in regulating the KRAS protein activity and revealed the advantages of the AS2 as the small molecule drug target, aiming to provide theoretical guidance for the research of novel KRAS protein inhibitors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of biochemistry and biophysics\",\"volume\":\"760 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of biochemistry and biophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003986124002595\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of biochemistry and biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003986124002595","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为许多细胞信号网络的重要枢纽,KRAS(Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue,克氏大鼠肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物)已被确定为肿瘤生物标志物。它是人类癌症中经常发生突变的癌基因,在许多人类肿瘤组织中都发现了由 G12D 等突变引起的 KRAS 蛋白活化。虽然 KRAS 蛋白上有两个特定的异位点(AS1 和 AS2)可作为抑制剂开发的靶点,但两个异位点之间调控机制的差异仍未见报道。在此,我们利用分子动力学模拟结合分子力学广义生表面积(MM/GBSA)分析发现,位于AS1和AS2的抑制剂都能显著降低野生型、突变型KRAS(G12/D/V/S/C)与GTP之间的结合自由能,但抑制剂对野生型、突变型KRAS与GDP之间结合自由能的影响有限。此外,AS2 抑制剂对 KRAS 和 GTP 之间结合自由能的降低程度明显高于 AS1 抑制剂。进一步分析发现,AS1和AS2抑制剂都能调节开关Ⅰ和开关Ⅱ的波动,扩大正交位点(GTP结合位点)的口袋,从而减少KRAS与GTP的结合。值得注意的是,两种抑制剂对开关Ⅰ和开关Ⅱ的调控偏好存在显著差异。AS2 抑制剂主要通过调控 Switch Ⅱ 来影响正交位点的口袋,而 AS1 抑制剂主要通过调控 Switch Ⅰ 的波动来扩大正交位点的口袋。我们的研究比较了两类抑制剂在调控KRAS蛋白活性方面的差异,揭示了AS2作为小分子药物靶点的优势,旨在为新型KRAS蛋白抑制剂的研究提供理论指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insight of the molecular mechanism of inhibitors located at different allosteric sites regulating the activity of wild type and mutant KRAS (G12)

As the important hub of many cellular signaling networks, KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue) has been identified as a tumor biomarker. It is the frequently mutated oncogene in human cancers, and KRAS protein activation caused by mutations, such as G12D, has been found in many human tumors tissues. Although, there are two specific allosteric sites (AS1 and AS2) on the KRAS protein that can be used as the targets for inhibitor development, the difference of regulatory mechanisms between two individual allosteric sites still not be reported. Here, using molecular dynamics simulations combined with molecular mechanics generalized born surface area (MM/GBSA) analysis, we found that both of the inhibitors, located at AS1 and AS2, were able to reduce the binding free energy between wild type, mutant KRAS (G12/D/V/S/C) and GTP remarkably, however the effect of inhibitors on the binding free energy between wild type, mutant KRAS and GDP was limited. In addition, the degree of decrease of binding free energy between KRAS and GTP caused by inhibitors at AS2 was significantly greater than that caused by inhibitors at AS1. Further analysis revealed that both inhibitors at AS1 and AS2 were able to regulate the fluctuation of Switch Ⅰ and Switch Ⅱ to expand the pocket of the orthosteric site (GTP binding site), thereby reducing the binding of KRAS to GTP. Noteworthy there was significant differences in the regulatory preferences on Switch Ⅰ and Switch Ⅱ between two type inhibitor. The inhibitor at AS2 mainly regulated Switch Ⅱ to affect the pocket of the orthosteric site, while the inhibitor at AS1 mainly expand the pocket of the orthosteric site by regulating the fluctuation of Switch Ⅰ. Our study compared the differences between two type inhibitors in regulating the KRAS protein activity and revealed the advantages of the AS2 as the small molecule drug target, aiming to provide theoretical guidance for the research of novel KRAS protein inhibitors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of biochemistry and biophysics
Archives of biochemistry and biophysics 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics publishes quality original articles and reviews in the developing areas of biochemistry and biophysics. Research Areas Include: • Enzyme and protein structure, function, regulation. Folding, turnover, and post-translational processing • Biological oxidations, free radical reactions, redox signaling, oxygenases, P450 reactions • Signal transduction, receptors, membrane transport, intracellular signals. Cellular and integrated metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Effects of sulforaphane on prostate cancer stem cells-like properties: In vitro and molecular docking studies. ECH 1 attenuates atherosclerosis by reducing macrophage infiltration and improving plaque stability through CD36 degradation. Tanshinone IIA alleviates inflammation-induced skeletal muscle atrophy by regulating mitochondrial dysfunction Mg2+ binding to Coenzyme A. New insights into the function and molecular mechanisms of Ferredoxin-NADP+ reductase from Brucella ovis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1