Marie Haase Juhl, Anne Estrup Olesen, Ellen Tveter Deilkås, Niels Henrik Bruun, Kirsten Høgh Obling, Nikoline Rytter, Maya Damgaard Larsen, Solvejg Kristensen
{"title":"丹麦基层医疗机构的患者安全氛围：丹麦安全态度问卷（SAQ-DK-PRIM）的改编与验证。","authors":"Marie Haase Juhl, Anne Estrup Olesen, Ellen Tveter Deilkås, Niels Henrik Bruun, Kirsten Høgh Obling, Nikoline Rytter, Maya Damgaard Larsen, Solvejg Kristensen","doi":"10.2147/CLEP.S470111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A lack of instruments to assess patient safety climate within primary care exists. The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) To adapt the Danish hospital version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-DK) for use in primary care; 2) Test the internal consistency and the construct validity of this version; 3) Present benchmark data; and 4) Analyze variance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SAQ-DK was adapted for use in Danish primary care settings (SAQ-DK-PRIM) and distributed to healthcare staff members from nursing homes (N = 11), homecare units (N = 4) and healthcare units (N = 2), within the municipality of Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark. Face- and content validity were assessed. The construct validity was evaluated by a set of goodness-of-fit indices. The internal reliability was evaluated using the item-rest correlations, the inter-item correlations, and Cronbach's alpha (α).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adaptation process resulted in a questionnaire of 10 items. Eight hundred and thirty healthcare staffs participated (78% of the eligible respondents). In total 586 (70.6%) responses were complete and were included in the analysis. Goodness-of-fit indices from the confirmatory factor analysis showed: Chi<sup>2</sup>=46.90CFI=0.97, RMSEA = 0.063 (90% CI: 0.044-0.084), Probability RMSEA (p close)=0.12. Internal reliability was high (Cronbach's α=0.76). Proportions of participants with a positive attitude was 41.1% and did not differ between the healthcare services. Scale mean score was 70.19 (SD: 18.05) and differed between healthcare services. The safety climate scale scores did not vary according to healthcare service type. ICC was 0.68% indicating no clustering of scores by healthcare service type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the questionnaire's applicability, short length, strengthened focus on one area of interest and validity, the SAQ-DK-PRIM can serve as a valuable tool for measuring patient safety climate within primary care settings in Denmark.</p>","PeriodicalId":10362,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Safety Climate in Danish Primary Care: Adaption and Validation of the Danish Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-DK-PRIM).\",\"authors\":\"Marie Haase Juhl, Anne Estrup Olesen, Ellen Tveter Deilkås, Niels Henrik Bruun, Kirsten Høgh Obling, Nikoline Rytter, Maya Damgaard Larsen, Solvejg Kristensen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CLEP.S470111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A lack of instruments to assess patient safety climate within primary care exists. The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) To adapt the Danish hospital version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-DK) for use in primary care; 2) Test the internal consistency and the construct validity of this version; 3) Present benchmark data; and 4) Analyze variance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SAQ-DK was adapted for use in Danish primary care settings (SAQ-DK-PRIM) and distributed to healthcare staff members from nursing homes (N = 11), homecare units (N = 4) and healthcare units (N = 2), within the municipality of Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark. Face- and content validity were assessed. The construct validity was evaluated by a set of goodness-of-fit indices. The internal reliability was evaluated using the item-rest correlations, the inter-item correlations, and Cronbach's alpha (α).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adaptation process resulted in a questionnaire of 10 items. Eight hundred and thirty healthcare staffs participated (78% of the eligible respondents). In total 586 (70.6%) responses were complete and were included in the analysis. Goodness-of-fit indices from the confirmatory factor analysis showed: Chi<sup>2</sup>=46.90CFI=0.97, RMSEA = 0.063 (90% CI: 0.044-0.084), Probability RMSEA (p close)=0.12. Internal reliability was high (Cronbach's α=0.76). Proportions of participants with a positive attitude was 41.1% and did not differ between the healthcare services. Scale mean score was 70.19 (SD: 18.05) and differed between healthcare services. The safety climate scale scores did not vary according to healthcare service type. ICC was 0.68% indicating no clustering of scores by healthcare service type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the questionnaire's applicability, short length, strengthened focus on one area of interest and validity, the SAQ-DK-PRIM can serve as a valuable tool for measuring patient safety climate within primary care settings in Denmark.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365490/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S470111\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S470111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient Safety Climate in Danish Primary Care: Adaption and Validation of the Danish Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-DK-PRIM).
Background: A lack of instruments to assess patient safety climate within primary care exists. The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) To adapt the Danish hospital version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-DK) for use in primary care; 2) Test the internal consistency and the construct validity of this version; 3) Present benchmark data; and 4) Analyze variance.
Methods: The SAQ-DK was adapted for use in Danish primary care settings (SAQ-DK-PRIM) and distributed to healthcare staff members from nursing homes (N = 11), homecare units (N = 4) and healthcare units (N = 2), within the municipality of Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark. Face- and content validity were assessed. The construct validity was evaluated by a set of goodness-of-fit indices. The internal reliability was evaluated using the item-rest correlations, the inter-item correlations, and Cronbach's alpha (α).
Results: The adaptation process resulted in a questionnaire of 10 items. Eight hundred and thirty healthcare staffs participated (78% of the eligible respondents). In total 586 (70.6%) responses were complete and were included in the analysis. Goodness-of-fit indices from the confirmatory factor analysis showed: Chi2=46.90CFI=0.97, RMSEA = 0.063 (90% CI: 0.044-0.084), Probability RMSEA (p close)=0.12. Internal reliability was high (Cronbach's α=0.76). Proportions of participants with a positive attitude was 41.1% and did not differ between the healthcare services. Scale mean score was 70.19 (SD: 18.05) and differed between healthcare services. The safety climate scale scores did not vary according to healthcare service type. ICC was 0.68% indicating no clustering of scores by healthcare service type.
Conclusion: Considering the questionnaire's applicability, short length, strengthened focus on one area of interest and validity, the SAQ-DK-PRIM can serve as a valuable tool for measuring patient safety climate within primary care settings in Denmark.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Epidemiology is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal. Clinical Epidemiology focuses on the application of epidemiological principles and questions relating to patients and clinical care in terms of prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.
Clinical Epidemiology welcomes papers covering these topics in form of original research and systematic reviews.
Clinical Epidemiology has a special interest in international electronic medical patient records and other routine health care data, especially as applied to safety of medical interventions, clinical utility of diagnostic procedures, understanding short- and long-term clinical course of diseases, clinical epidemiological and biostatistical methods, and systematic reviews.
When considering submission of a paper utilizing publicly-available data, authors should ensure that such studies add significantly to the body of knowledge and that they use appropriate validated methods for identifying health outcomes.
The journal has launched special series describing existing data sources for clinical epidemiology, international health care systems and validation studies of algorithms based on databases and registries.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
