Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) patients without coronary artery disease (CAD) have a higher all-cause mortality rate than patients with neither DM nor CAD. We examined cause-specific death of DM patients with and without CAD.
Methods: We conducted a cohort study of all patients who underwent CAG in Western Denmark between 2003 and 2016. Using Danish health registries, patients were followed for a maximum of 10 years and stratified according to their DM and CAD status. Outcomes included all-cause-, cancer-, circulatory-, and endocrinologic death. Ten-year cumulative risks were computed as well as adjusted and unadjusted hazard ratios (aHR and HR).
Results: A total of 132,432 patients (28,524 deaths, median follow-up of 6.2 years) were included. Compared to patients with neither DM nor CAD, DM patients without CAD had a higher 10-year risk of all-cause death (27.9% versus 19.7%, aHR 1.43 [95% CI 1.35-1.52]), cancer death (7.2% versus 5.4%, aHR 1.29 [95% CI 1.15-1.46]), circulatory death (9.1% versus 6.9%, aHR 1.35 [95% CI 1.22-1.49]), and endocrinologic death (3.9% versus 0.3%, aHR 14.02 [95% CI 10.95-17.95]). Among endocrinologic deaths, 87% were due to classical complications of DM, such as diabetic nephropathy and ketoacidosis, in DM patients without CAD.
Conclusion: Diabetes patients without CAD exhibit a higher risk of all-cause mortality, driven primarily by elevated rates of cancer, circulatory, and endocrinologic deaths, particularly related to diabetic microvascular complications.
Invasive candidiasis (IC) is an increasingly prevalent, costly, and potentially fatal infection brought on by the opportunistic yeast, Candida. Previously, IC has predominantly been caused by C. albicans which is often drug susceptible. There has been a global trend towards decreasing rates of infection secondary to C. albicans and a rise in non-albicans species with a corresponding increase in drug resistance creating treatment challenges. With advances in management of malignancies, there has also been an increase in the population at risk from IC along with a corresponding increase in incidence of breakthrough IC infections. Additionally, the emergence of C. auris creates many challenges in management and prevention due to drug resistance and the organism's ability to transmit rapidly in the healthcare setting. While the development of novel antifungals is encouraging for future management, understanding the changing epidemiology of IC is a vital step in future management and prevention.
Background: A lack of instruments to assess patient safety climate within primary care exists. The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) To adapt the Danish hospital version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-DK) for use in primary care; 2) Test the internal consistency and the construct validity of this version; 3) Present benchmark data; and 4) Analyze variance.
Methods: The SAQ-DK was adapted for use in Danish primary care settings (SAQ-DK-PRIM) and distributed to healthcare staff members from nursing homes (N = 11), homecare units (N = 4) and healthcare units (N = 2), within the municipality of Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark. Face- and content validity were assessed. The construct validity was evaluated by a set of goodness-of-fit indices. The internal reliability was evaluated using the item-rest correlations, the inter-item correlations, and Cronbach's alpha (α).
Results: The adaptation process resulted in a questionnaire of 10 items. Eight hundred and thirty healthcare staffs participated (78% of the eligible respondents). In total 586 (70.6%) responses were complete and were included in the analysis. Goodness-of-fit indices from the confirmatory factor analysis showed: Chi2=46.90CFI=0.97, RMSEA = 0.063 (90% CI: 0.044-0.084), Probability RMSEA (p close)=0.12. Internal reliability was high (Cronbach's α=0.76). Proportions of participants with a positive attitude was 41.1% and did not differ between the healthcare services. Scale mean score was 70.19 (SD: 18.05) and differed between healthcare services. The safety climate scale scores did not vary according to healthcare service type. ICC was 0.68% indicating no clustering of scores by healthcare service type.
Conclusion: Considering the questionnaire's applicability, short length, strengthened focus on one area of interest and validity, the SAQ-DK-PRIM can serve as a valuable tool for measuring patient safety climate within primary care settings in Denmark.