心力衰竭患者的日常体力活动和预后影响:加速度计研究。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Clinical Research in Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1007/s00392-024-02508-0
Andreas Bugge Tinggaard, Lotte Sørensen, Kristian Vissing, Niels Jessen, Helene Nørrelund, Henrik Wiggers
{"title":"心力衰竭患者的日常体力活动和预后影响:加速度计研究。","authors":"Andreas Bugge Tinggaard, Lotte Sørensen, Kristian Vissing, Niels Jessen, Helene Nørrelund, Henrik Wiggers","doi":"10.1007/s00392-024-02508-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity (PA) measured by accelerometry is proposed as a novel trial endpoint for heart failure (HF). However, standardised methods and associations with established markers are lacking. This study aimed to examine PA measurements and accelerometer repeatability in patients with HF and age- and sex-matched controls, and study correlations with established prognostic HF markers, body composition, and quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accelerometry was performed in 105 patients with HF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% and in 46 controls. Participants also underwent dual X-ray absorptiometry, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, a six-minute walking test (6MWT), echocardiography, and NT-proBNP measurement, and completed a QoL questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average acceleration was markedly reduced in patients with HF compared with healthy controls (16.1 ± 4.8 mg vs 27.2 ± 8.5 mg, p < 0.001). Healthy controls spent a median daily 56 min (IQR 41-96 min) in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), whereas HF patients spent only 12 min (IQR 6-24) in MVPA. In HF patients, average acceleration correlated moderately with 6MWT (R = 0.41, p < 0.001) and maximal oxygen uptake (peak VO<sub>2</sub>) (R = 0.36, p < 0.001) but not with NT-proBNP, LVEF, or QoL. Patients in NYHA class II showed a higher average acceleration than patients in NYHA III (16.6 ± 4.9 mg vs 14.0 ± 3.6 mg, p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Daily PA was severely reduced in patients with HF compared with healthy controls. In HF patients, we found moderate correlations of accelerometer measurements with markers of physical capacity but not with LVEF or NT-proBNP.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05063955. Registered 01 June 2021-retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daily physical activity and prognostic implications in patients with heart failure: an accelerometer study.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Bugge Tinggaard, Lotte Sørensen, Kristian Vissing, Niels Jessen, Helene Nørrelund, Henrik Wiggers\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00392-024-02508-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity (PA) measured by accelerometry is proposed as a novel trial endpoint for heart failure (HF). However, standardised methods and associations with established markers are lacking. This study aimed to examine PA measurements and accelerometer repeatability in patients with HF and age- and sex-matched controls, and study correlations with established prognostic HF markers, body composition, and quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accelerometry was performed in 105 patients with HF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% and in 46 controls. Participants also underwent dual X-ray absorptiometry, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, a six-minute walking test (6MWT), echocardiography, and NT-proBNP measurement, and completed a QoL questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average acceleration was markedly reduced in patients with HF compared with healthy controls (16.1 ± 4.8 mg vs 27.2 ± 8.5 mg, p < 0.001). Healthy controls spent a median daily 56 min (IQR 41-96 min) in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), whereas HF patients spent only 12 min (IQR 6-24) in MVPA. In HF patients, average acceleration correlated moderately with 6MWT (R = 0.41, p < 0.001) and maximal oxygen uptake (peak VO<sub>2</sub>) (R = 0.36, p < 0.001) but not with NT-proBNP, LVEF, or QoL. Patients in NYHA class II showed a higher average acceleration than patients in NYHA III (16.6 ± 4.9 mg vs 14.0 ± 3.6 mg, p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Daily PA was severely reduced in patients with HF compared with healthy controls. In HF patients, we found moderate correlations of accelerometer measurements with markers of physical capacity but not with LVEF or NT-proBNP.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05063955. Registered 01 June 2021-retrospectively registered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02508-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-024-02508-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通过加速度计测量的体力活动(PA)被提议作为心力衰竭(HF)试验的新终点。然而,目前还缺乏标准化的方法以及与既定指标之间的关联。本研究旨在检查心力衰竭患者以及年龄和性别匹配的对照组的体力活动测量值和加速度计重复性,并研究其与心力衰竭预后指标、身体成分和生活质量(QoL)之间的相关性:方法:对 105 名左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤ 40% 的高血压患者和 46 名对照组患者进行加速度测量。参与者还接受了双 X 射线吸收测量、心肺运动测试、六分钟步行测试(6MWT)、超声心动图和 NT-proBNP 测量,并填写了 QoL 问卷:与健康对照组相比,心房颤动患者的平均加速度明显降低(16.1 ± 4.8 mg vs 27.2 ± 8.5 mg,P 2)(R = 0.36,P 结论:心房颤动患者的平均加速度明显降低(16.1 ± 4.8 mg vs 27.2 ± 8.5 mg,P 2):与健康对照组相比,心房颤动患者的日常活动量严重减少。在心房颤动患者中,我们发现加速度计测量值与体能指标有一定的相关性,但与 LVEF 或 NT-proBNP 没有相关性:试验注册:NCT05063955。注册日期:2021 年 6 月 1 日-回顾性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Daily physical activity and prognostic implications in patients with heart failure: an accelerometer study.

Background: Physical activity (PA) measured by accelerometry is proposed as a novel trial endpoint for heart failure (HF). However, standardised methods and associations with established markers are lacking. This study aimed to examine PA measurements and accelerometer repeatability in patients with HF and age- and sex-matched controls, and study correlations with established prognostic HF markers, body composition, and quality of life (QoL).

Methods: Accelerometry was performed in 105 patients with HF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% and in 46 controls. Participants also underwent dual X-ray absorptiometry, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, a six-minute walking test (6MWT), echocardiography, and NT-proBNP measurement, and completed a QoL questionnaire.

Results: Average acceleration was markedly reduced in patients with HF compared with healthy controls (16.1 ± 4.8 mg vs 27.2 ± 8.5 mg, p < 0.001). Healthy controls spent a median daily 56 min (IQR 41-96 min) in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), whereas HF patients spent only 12 min (IQR 6-24) in MVPA. In HF patients, average acceleration correlated moderately with 6MWT (R = 0.41, p < 0.001) and maximal oxygen uptake (peak VO2) (R = 0.36, p < 0.001) but not with NT-proBNP, LVEF, or QoL. Patients in NYHA class II showed a higher average acceleration than patients in NYHA III (16.6 ± 4.9 mg vs 14.0 ± 3.6 mg, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Daily PA was severely reduced in patients with HF compared with healthy controls. In HF patients, we found moderate correlations of accelerometer measurements with markers of physical capacity but not with LVEF or NT-proBNP.

Trial registration: NCT05063955. Registered 01 June 2021-retrospectively registered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
期刊最新文献
ACEF score and lactate: lifeline predictors in endocarditis valve procedures: insights from a single-center study. Percutaneous aspiration for shortening time to blood cultures sterilization in right-sided infective endocarditis and vegetations. In-hospital bioimpedance-derived total body water predicts short-term cardiovascular mortality and re-hospitalizations in acute decompensated heart failure patients. Overlapping obstructive sleep apnea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Influence of diabetes and obesity on ten-year outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting in the arterial revascularisation trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1